Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBO deals blow to Blue Dogs - tethering public option to Medicare would save $110 billion (politico)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 05:27 PM
Original message
CBO deals blow to Blue Dogs - tethering public option to Medicare would save $110 billion (politico)
Edited on Thu Sep-24-09 05:28 PM by jefferson_dem
CBO estimate deals blow to Blue Dogs

The Congressional Budget Office dealt Blue Dogs a blow Thursday by notifying House Democrats that tethering a public option to Medicare reimbursement rates would save the government $110 billion more than a public option in which the government has to negotiate rates with doctors and other health care providers.

The initial projections showed the difference between the two was $65 billion. But this shows it would cost the government a lot more money to heed moderate demands.

House Democrats need to trim as much as $200 billion from a bill that most estimates peg at $1.1 trillion in order to meet President Obama's $900 billion target.

CORRECTION: There has been some confusion among members this afternoon about the actual score that CBO released - ours is based on multiple conversations with members and staff. It looks like the total savings for a public option that was included in the Education and Labor Committee (which reimburses health care providers at rates that are 5 percent higher than those set by Medicare) would save the government $110 billion. A public option in which the government must negotiate its rates with doctors and other health care providers would save the government $25 billion. So the difference is $85 billion, not $110 billion, as I previously wrote.

But none of these figures is based on an actual CBO report; instead, these are based on conversations with lawmakers and aides who attended an afternoon caucus meeting in the Capitol basement on Thursday.

http://www.politico.com/livepulse/0909/CBO_estimate_deals_blow_to_Blue_Dogs.html?showall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Newshues Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Blue Dogs opposition to tieing rates to Medicare
isn't based on saving the federal government money. Their opposition is that Medicare rates do not pay enough to rural hospitals, generally speaking, such that private payers of all types are subsidizing Medicare patients in many, if not most, rural hospitals. Most of the Blue Dogs come from conservative leaning RURAL districts.

They have a point. Rather than hold up meaningful health care reform they can solve the problem of rural hospitals another way. What's clear is that none of them want to go back to their districts and be unable to defend themselves from attacks for putting their local, rural, hospitals at risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. MEDICARE FOR ALL!!!! SINGLE PAYER NOW!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. kicking for general principles.NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think the GOP representatives are having a fit right now with
this news. I believe Pres. Obama has them so confused. Their pea brains cannot absorb any more info. He is dancing circles around them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Promising and perhaps the Medicare for All CBO score will even be better... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. B-b-b-b-ut it's still PUBLIC
The horror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. I hope Rockefeller beats the shit PO haters with this stick tommorow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good, but not based on a REPORT.
Is cbo doing a report on such? Haven't they resisited such? Would be great!

Can't imagine cost of govt having to negotiate with all, but thats just me and my small mind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC