Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Bad Republican Form

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 03:59 PM
Original message
More Bad Republican Form
http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/09/21/more-bad-republican-form/


More Bad Republican Form
Posted by Michael Scherer Monday, September 21, 2009 at 3:38 pm





About a month ago, a Republican National Committee mailer surfaced, showing that the party had sent out a bogus "poll." The poll asked recipients if they were concerned that Democrats would pass health care reform that would deny Republicans treatment because they were Republicans. This ridiculous and false notion, the mailer said, "has been suggested" by unknown forces. When I called the RNC for comment, a spokesman admitted the shameless ploy had been "inartfully worded."

Now comes word, via Sam Stein at Huffington Post, that the National Republican Senatorial Committee is trying to fool Americans with the same trick. Their bogus "poll" asks:

Are you concerned that health care rationing could lead to:

23. Denial of treatment in cases where the patient's prospects are deemed not good?
24. A "lottery" system of determining who will get priority treatment?
25. A "quota" system which would determine who would get treatment on the basis of race or age?


Needless to say, none of these things have been proposed in either house of Congress. None of them will pass. The mailer also suggests that the following ideas are "up for debate" in Congress over the coming weeks, including whether or not the government gets to:

• Pick who is "eligible" for certain medical procedures? • Pick your doctor for you? • Restrict certain medical procedures on the basis of age? • Put strict price controls on medicine and drugs? • Penalize you for choosing to see a private doctor • Seriously undermine private health care insurers who currently serve tens of millions of Americans?


In a just, fully functioning Democratic debate, there would be consequences for such fearmongering by a major political party. Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who signs the direct mail piece, would actually be forced to either defend the document, by backing up the claims with actual evidence that these claims are in any way relevant to the current discussion, or he would be discredited as someone willing to fool people--not to mention the elderly--for political advantage.

But this is not a fully functioning Democratic system.
I have nonetheless, asked the NRSC for comment. I am told I will get a response, which I will post promptly.

UPDATE: Brian Walsh a spokesman for the NRSC did call me back, and defended the mailer, not as a description of any of the Democratic plans, but rather as an open-ended musing on possible health care reform ideas. "It simply poses questions," said Walsh. "In looking at it, it doesn't say definitely what the president's health care plan is." Walsh added that no one knows what the final Obama health care legislation might contain. "He has not put forward legislative text," he said. "We have no idea what the Democratic bill is going to look like."

So in other words, Walsh is maintaining that the most alarming parts of the faux poll do not describe anything that Democrats or Obama has proposed, but rather describe things that could still be proposed at some point in the future to surprise everybody. Needless to say, it is rather unlikely--call it completely inconceivable--that Obama or Democratic leaders would introduce an 11th-hour amendment to deny health care to Americans based on race. What may be more interesting is the tactic at play. This is another version of a "The Great Unknown" attack on Obama, a technique I have previously described, in which opponents choose to critique Obama not for what he is doing, but for what is unknown about his actions or what he might do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck the Republicans. If they want to pay for healthcare, let them go to... to...
... fuck, where DO they still pay for healthcare?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. "A "quota" system which would determine who would get treatment on the basis of race or age?"
Nice. One for the white-sheet crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Aren't these Republicans so succesful that they could pay for their own treatment
and the best treatment at that - I thought their whining had to do with paying for others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Scherer going after the Republicans? What's this world coming to?
Edited on Mon Sep-21-09 04:35 PM by DrToast
Maybe there's hope for that guy yet. I guess everyone has a breaking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's funny; I never noticed his partisanship. I don't read
him all that often though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Are you concerned that health care rationing could lead to:" ---
No wonder the GOP has little-to-no credibility outside of the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh, they have plenty of brainwashed devotees up here
in upstate New York.

They eat that shite up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Granted. (Speaking more electorally.) :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh right..as in massively. My county
went 55% for mcpalin and that's way too much for moi.

I can't wait to retire next year to Kaua'i..the Islands of PO's birthB-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes, yes, I know about upstate. :) Hawaii - very nice.
Yeah, I have relatives who live upstate in Bumrush, NY -- it is seriously creepy there. But thank goodness, NY still appears as blue on the electoral map. :)

Ah, Hawaii -- I LOVE it there. That is awesome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tledford Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yeah, like all those "southern" states McCain carried last Fall...
Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Utah, Kansas, Missouri ...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Alright -- I see I'm going to have to actually include a link to what I'm referring to --
Edited on Mon Sep-21-09 06:38 PM by quiet.american
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tledford Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The thing that the Mother Jones article proves is that the way people vote...
...doesn't have anything to do with whether or not they approve of Republicans. And there is complete lack of definition of the regions. Wyoming is certainly the "West" as is Idaho, and yet they vote solidly Republican. North Carolina is in the "South" yet Obama carried it (barely) in 2008, which thrilled me no end since I'm a lifelong white NC Democrat.

You're falling into precisely the trap that the Republicans and the power structure behind them have set for you -- namely, you've been lulled into a false sense of security, into thinking that the Republican party is no longer relevant.

But by leveraging their money and power (money *IS* power until campaign finance is made exclusively public) and the fear and hatred of the ignorant American populace, they *will* remain a serious political force for the foreseeable future.

It's sad, but it's true, and we need to be constantly aware of it in order to be prepared for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thanks for the lecture. (I hate lectures).
Don't worry, I understand your fear of complacency, but your assumption that I'm complacent is unfounded. I've been at this for some time, too. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-22-09 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. I'm out here in Nebraska, there are plenty of brain dead goomers
here as well. Out here, it is all about "abortion, God and welfare". I've made progress explaining that "choice" means precisely that; no one is saying religions will be "destroyed"; and no one is taking their firearms away. The big thing is to get people to actually think; as opposed to being scared all of the time. After all, if ignorance truly was bliss, there would be dancing in the streets 24/7...:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Filthy, barely-human scum
There are almost no redeemable Repukes left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. The fool. Every time a psychic hotline goes bust, the RNC gobbles up all the talent on the cheap.
Edited on Mon Sep-21-09 11:24 PM by DCKit
The RNC is bursting at the seams with fortune tellers, card readers and every other form of prognostication out there. They've cornered the market on goats and chickens, putting real economic pressure on the practice of Santeria as well as our local butchers.

Don't be obtuse: they know our minds, and they know our futures.

By the way, did anyone hear how the Rapture went today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-22-09 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
17. so which is it? that healthcare is GOOD & 'they' are going to take it away,
OR is it that healthcare is BAD & no one should want it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czar One Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-22-09 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
18. Is there any GOOD Republican form?
Except for the guy in RI?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-22-09 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
20. Republicanism as a pre-existing condition? I like the concept.
Maybe file it under 'Behavioral Health' -- very likely an Axis II issue

Certainly highly characterological.

And of course the cure rate is very discouraging...

- - -

Rec'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC