|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:27 PM Original message |
George W. Bush had more "czars" than Obama has had, so where was the outrage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. And Ronald Reagan appointed the first "czar" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I heard last week that Nixon appointed an Energy Czar -- and actually called him a czar. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtb33 (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Actually, I think FDR did... eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YOY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. Let me answer with one word: "Douchebaggery" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. Maybe I'm reading the table wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Here's your answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. That was actually the first thing I noticed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
7. Czar just means high level advisor with a title we can't be bothered to recall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. Because of Iokiyar Syndrome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mscuedawg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
10. It sounds so ... Russian ... and that sounds so ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackass Party (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. INSANITY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC