Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the "lie" comment the "Police acted stupidely" from some weeks ago?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 06:40 PM
Original message
Is the "lie" comment the "Police acted stupidely" from some weeks ago?
It appeared that the "lie" started all news reports all day. Something for pundits to chew upon and to roll instead of the serious matter of the President's speech.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep...
Which is why I think it was planned, not "spontaneous" as Wilson claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, the Republicans aren't smart enough for that
But the media are awful enough to ignore the speech in favor of some more exciting bit of nonsense. If it wasn't Wilson, it would have been Cantor's texting or some of the other, quieter heckling, or even how appropriate it was to use Kennedy's letter.

The media suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I heard last night that Wilson had already twittered that he was going to do that - that's why so
many don't accept his apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. There's another reason to refuse his apology...
He admitted on camera in an interview with the press that the only reason he called the White House to apologize was because the Republican leadership told him to. He showed no remorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Of course he does not regret it
And as much as many of us donated to his opponent, I am sure that his campaign fund has received its own injections.

Still, probably was good idea by the White House to accept the apology and to dispose of this, hoping that the media will find something else to chew on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. The difference being....
..... last time the President still had a lot of work to do convincing people ..... this time, by the time of Mr. Wilson's outburst, the President had already done what he needed to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItNerd4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ok, this is scary. I was just thinking that when I saw your post
I think both statements were stupid, but everybody is entitled to act stupidly once. If either of them repeats the same mistake, then they've migrated from stupid to Republican.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Seemed like it could have been pre-planned.
Private insurers paid right wing PR firms to stir up fear and hatred in vulnerable populations to keep the summer dialog off of how seriously broken our for-profit health insurance system is, and our right wing dominated media ran with those stories, instead of ignoring the lunatic fringe in favor of a serious debate.

So, cynical Republicans like Gingrich, Rove, Luntz et al, may just have figured the Blessed Corporations would appreciate a little distraction from the serious debate President Obama was calling for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. No. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC