Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton said he pleaded with Congress to write a bill, but they refused

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:06 PM
Original message
Clinton said he pleaded with Congress to write a bill, but they refused
From the NYT (with video):

As keynote speaker at the Netroots Nation conference of progressive/liberal bloggers in Pittsburgh, Mr. Clinton sarcastically denounced what he considers the false, revisionist history: “Everybody knows that Hillary presented this horribly complicated, 1,300-page bill, which would have broken the back of the federal statutes. And what she should’ve done was refused to present a bill and just have her committee issue a report to Congress with recommendations.”

In reality, Mr. Clinton said, the bill-writing was dictated by Congress: “We actually pleaded with the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee to let us send a report with recommendations and have them write the bill, and he said, ‘I will not take this up unless you send me a bill.’ ”

Mr. Clinton recalled that the chairman at the time — Representative Dan Rostenkowski, whom President Clinton later pardoned for a mail-fraud conviction — countered that without a presidential bill, interest groups would swarm all over his committee. The lobbyists would overwhelm the lawmakers, in other words.

And according to Mr. Clinton, the chairman argued: “There’s not enough base-level knowledge in the Congress to resist it, and we will never get anywhere. This will not happen unless you give a bill.”

Giving Congress the bill that Mr. Clinton says it requested didn’t work out; the proposal was complicated, with new layers of governmental control seized upon by opponents within and outside the legislative branch. Mr. Clinton blames the insurance industry, in particular, for dooming his plan.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's sad is how easily influenced our congress is by lobbiest, I'd run far away from them as
...soon as I saw them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Easily influenced because they have very little idea what it's like to be us and they do nothing
to remedy that situation.

I'd LOVE to have the time and resources to do a study of EXACTLY what becomes of all of the public phone calls, emails, letters, faxes, petitions and all of the other ways that we make ourselves and what's going on with us known to them, compared to similar communications from deep-pocket$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. They are filed under
trash.:shrug: What have you done for your Congressman or Senator lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ye-ah.."the insurance companies" and here
they are again out in full force along with every other facistshit opposing real health care for Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, also shows how much
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 02:46 PM by ProSense
a President can strong-arm a Congress if the members are not willing to go along.

Obama has pushed health care reform beyond the doors of Congress. A bill will be voted on, moved to Congress conference, and sent to Obama to sign.





Edited typo, wrong word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, and I do know that we
have a President and his Team who are pushing very hard for a good Bill to sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malletgirl02 Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. History Repeating
The same thing that happen to Clinton is happening to Obama. Hopefully Obama is learning and will correct his current course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. What?
The two situations aren't remotely alike.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malletgirl02 Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Congress
That was about Congress dragging its feet not Obama. Despite all the letters and the demands of the progressives in Congress pushing Obama on the Public option, but not bills have come out of committee. I get what, Obama is doing. I think it is a like, because like Clinton, Obama is trusting Congress to come up with a bill, and they are dragging their feet. It is up to Congress to write the bill since he isn't in the legislative branch, and he wants to respect the process. I guess, I just got caught up in the negativity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Congress has written and passed four bills out of committee
and will vote on a bill shortly. This isn't remotely similar to the situation in the 90s.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. No, Quite the opposite as I am reading it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think Clinton is telling the whole truth here
He refused to support a bipartisan bill from the House and he refused to support a bipartisan bill that Bill Bradley wrote. It may be true that the chair of Ways and Means did say this, but that doesn't mean no one in Congress would. SCHIP started in the Senate.

To me this sounds like Clinton trying to spin the way they did healthcare. Not to mention, if true, they should have included Senate experts - such as Kennedy, but they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Thank you for pointing out the admirable role of Bill Bradley and
thank you for suggesting that many in the Congress, including Kennedy's office, were pointedly excluded from the process.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bottom Line - Handing Congress A Written Bill Didn't Work B/C
Then Congress is not invested in it at all, and they distance themselves from it the moment lobbyists get to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
16. Bill has been saying this for years.
Nothing new, except that as usual, he's the favorite whipping boy of the right AND the left. Therefore, not too many people bothered to listen to the reasons why they felt that they had to draft the bill themselves until now. Obama let Congress do their thing and isn't that just going peachy.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yet the official WH line is that they have learned from the Clinton's mistakes
--therefore they believe the lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Please share...what "lies" is the WH believing now? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC