Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grassley Retracts Claim That Government Could “Pull The Plug On Grandma”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 08:47 AM
Original message
Grassley Retracts Claim That Government Could “Pull The Plug On Grandma”
Grassley Retracts Claim That Government Could “Pull The Plug On Grandma”

This passed unnoticed, but it’s a big deal: Over the weekend, and very quietly, Senator Chuck Grassley completely retracted his widely-reported claim last week that people have “every reason to fear” that the House health care proposal would create a “government program that determines if you’re going to pull the plug on grandma.”

The retraction was buried deep in this Washington Post article on Grassley’s role, with a spokesperson admitting Grassley doesn’t really believe what he said about “grandma”:

Grassley says he opposes that counseling as written in the House version of the bill, but a spokesman said the senator does not think the House provision would in fact give the government such authority in deciding when and how people die. The House bill allows patients to decide for themselves if they would like such counseling.

Let’s be clear: By clarifying that Grassley doesn’t think the House bill would “give the government such authority in deciding when and how people die,” his spokesperson completely repudiated his widely discussed claim. This goes much farther than Grassley did in a statement released Friday clarifying he’d never used the words “death panel” and was merely worried about “unintended consequences.”

So, either Grassley made his claim about “grandma” to a crowd in his home state last week and didn’t believe it; or he changed his mind since then.

Grassley’s retraction will get nowhere near the coverage his initial statement did. False or outlandish claims are “controversial,” so they get rewarded with media attention; their subsequent retractions tend to pass unnoticed, because the press has moved on to the next false or outlandish claim. The big news orgs blared Grassley’s initial assertion at the electorate for days, but almost no one will ever learn that Grassley didn’t really mean it.

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/grassley-retracts-claim-that-government-could-pull-the-plug-on-grandma/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. It was so quiet, I didn't hear him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, he needs to stand up in front of something
made out of cement and say it LOUD AND CLEAR! The punk ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Silent fart. Very little noise (if any) but big stink. Too bad M$M isn't
calling attention to it like they did Tiger Wood's non-silent one.

Time after time M$M proves itself to be the GOP's megaphone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Take a good look at the weasel...would you expect anything
different from him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. doesn't he have this habit of saying inflammatory lies and then retracting them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, well, well....Crazy old Grasshead actually admitted he was an idiot.
Sometimes a Rethug can be right about something. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Typical Republicon weasel
Makes a big fat FALSE public statement, then after the furor has petered out utters a weak, lame, wimpy 'ooops' that no one will hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Grassely LIED right to the face of his constituents ... no question about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Like retracting a fart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Pretty much. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. I am SO sick of retractions AFTER the damage is done.
It's just abusive behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah, and look at all the MSM attention the retraction got....
...wow....just wow!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. Of course HE doesn't believe it ...
There are a bunch of easily frightened people listening, however, and their beliefs will be guided by what people like Grassley say. He knew that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. It Doesn't Matter Whether He Believes It Or Not - What Matters.....
is that the people that heard him say it - believe it. So "Mission Accomplished" huh Chuck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. There's no retraction there.
His "clarification," as per the Republican Opposites Principle, is mere obfuscation, and the flip-flop was issued by a spokesperson.

Grassley doesn't have the guts to retract his lies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. Sorry Chuck. It is out there and I hope it gets you defeated next year!
and I promise to help defeat you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. this the same time Sebelius "Misspeaks"
...... interesting.

The across town mind f*ckage is fascinating. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. Cheesy Chuck
It is amazing that anybody with a minutia of common sense believes anything this blowhard has to say . . .

Oh, yeah . . . they don't!

Unfortunately for the rest of us, history is replete with fear mongering airheads who have caused major destruction and a world of hurt because they new how to fan the flames of fear among those who were gullible enough or desperate enough to believe them.

:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC