Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What would have been the negatives?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:16 AM
Original message
What would have been the negatives?
It seems to me that this entire Health Care discussion should have been carried out in this manner. "We are going to expand Medicare to anyone who wants it". Period, end of story.

Then the job would have been to show how Medicare works for the ones who have it now and how it would work the same for all.

I understand that the "reason" this isn't being done is because of the insurance lobby, but wouldn't this have been a much better way to propose change?

Since MANY of the ones screaming against health care reform are actually ON medicare now, it would have been simple to ask them "if it works for YOU, why are you screaming?"

I guess I think too simplistically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC