Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama EPA approves another mountaintop removal mine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:18 AM
Original message
Obama EPA approves another mountaintop removal mine
Edited on Wed Aug-12-09 05:23 AM by Adenoid_Hynkel
Come on, Barack!
I worked my butt off for you in WV last year.
I'm trying to be optimistic and am still in your corner, but this is very, very disappointing to me.

----

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- The Obama administration late last week quietly approved one of six major mountaintop removal permits that were said to be undergoing close scrutiny by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Without announcing the move publicly, EPA gave the nod for the federal Army Corps of Engineers to issue a Clean Water Act permit for CONSOL Energy Inc.'s Peg Fork Surface Mine near Chattaroy in Mingo County.

more
http://www.wvgazette.com/News/200908110642
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's SO obvious you want a pony. How dare you question St. Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. What's wrong with mountaintop removal?
Edited on Wed Aug-12-09 06:21 AM by Fluffdaddy
If it's done right with environmental protection.

We need the coal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Seriously?
Headwater stream contamination, destruction of forests and natural habitats, loss of jobs (requires a hell of a lot fewer miners), contaminated well water, damage to nearby homes, areas that look like Vietnam after a healthy dosage of bombs and Agent Orange:



By the way, all those effects happen when they're following the environmental permits they're given; since the Army Corps of Engineers gets them, they're usually much less restrictive than what the law would require.

http://www.ilovemountains.org/resources/
http://www.kftc.org/our-work/general-assembly/stream-saver-bill/toolkit/WHATISMTR.pdf
http://www.mountainjusticesummer.org/facts/steps.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. whoa, yeah...that's nasty...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. omg, was that a serious question?
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Yes it's a serious question.
Edited on Wed Aug-12-09 11:45 AM by Fluffdaddy
I have no problem with it as long as the land is reclaimed. Logging companies have been doing it for years.

We need the coal an jobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. well, you can replant a forest, but once the mountain and valleys are gone, they are gone for good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. how do you do complete environment destruction
with "environmental protection?"

This alone is enough to make me hate humanity. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama was pro-coal all through the election. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Doesn't mean hes right or that he shouldn't be called on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Didn't say he was or he shouldn't. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. He made a big point about being for "clean" coal.
Edited on Wed Aug-12-09 10:01 AM by glitch
That must apply to only its consumption, not its extraction, right?

Beware the fine print.

edit: this weak defense shows how truly indefensible mountaintop removal is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. So? Does that mean this is perfectly fine?
No, it doesn't. I knew he would be friendly towards King Coal, didn't like it, but voted for him anyway. It doesn't mean he gets left of the hook for his administration allowing the continued destruction of our mountains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Just stating a fact. Now. folks are surprised. Beats me why. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. WTF?!
:mad:
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Only because there is demand.
What is the alternative?

If anyone if constantly plagued by the destruction of the world around him, it's me. I'm not defending this kind of action at all. I condemn it with every ounce of my body. I have given up more than most could take, because I couldn't tolerate seeing it. And now that I realize it's here to stay with us, I cringe in my sleep. It's that bad. I have no place to go to call home. Every place seems to have a piece of this death going on. And all because of demand. That translates to population, in case anyone needs to see that.

It's not Obama. It's us. Us, six billion times.

There is an alternative, but it means stopping what we're doing.


Here's just one little piece. The logging mill closed in this town. And it sits on a bluff overlooking the ocean. It must be a hundred acres of the most beautiful land on earth. And of course the idiots are already descending upon it to decide what it should be. I cringe and rage at this notion that we must do things. We cannot simply let alone. What about just leaving that land as it is. Why not just have a beautiful place. So it will probably end up another main street with stores. Or something equally as retched. Beauty, peace, silence. These are things that don't equate with American "values". We're a shitty people. That's my experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. the coal Barons must have a foot on Obama's throat


West Virgina used to be a totally beautiful state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Remember Bob Murray?
The fuckhat responsible for the Crandall mine tragedy?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_E._Murray
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. And the people of WV didn't want him. He got his butt kicked by McCain there.
Edited on Wed Aug-12-09 11:35 AM by asphalt.jungle
They seem to like these pro-coal industry policies and thought he wasn't going to be pro-coal enough to satisfy their local economic engine. People power and all of that nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC