Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Way they Were: Bush's 100 Days Report Card (from 1st term) and Pundit Comments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:20 PM
Original message
The Way they Were: Bush's 100 Days Report Card (from 1st term) and Pundit Comments
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 11:38 PM by FrenchieCat
There was no 2nd 100 days review that I could find as of yet from CNN. below you can see the love that they had for their dimson! Don't tell me that those mediawhores weren't kissing George Bush's ass from Day one till Day 2555! They would have kissed his 5 day old dirty drawers, if he would have allowed it.



actual report cards here:
http://www.cnn.com/POLL/results/1508981.html

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/bush.100/stories/report.card.html





Tucker Carlson
Political analyst
Co-host, 'The Spin Room'
"Generally I say Bush is doing fairly well, though we'll have to wait for at least Day 175 of his first 100 days to know for sure."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cottle
Co-host, 'Take 5'
"I have disagreed with a lot of his policy moves, but politically he continues to outperform expectations to the point of where folks in Washington are now talking about how much smarter he is than they actually thought.

"On education, he tells us it's his top priority but thus far has sat back and let Congress water down his plan to the point of worthlessness. He's low-key and stays out of the way much of the time, but he could use a lighter touch in dealing with Hill Democrats. He did not win points by cramming tax-cut legislation through the House early on."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert George
Panelist, 'Take 5'
"If a movie were to be made of Bush's first 100 days, the title would be 'Return to Normalcy.' This is a no-frills administration. The nation is suddenly free of 'The Perils of Pauline'/'Jerry Springer' nature of the Clinton years.

Specifics

"(He) survived his first international controversy, with no lives lost and America coming off looking fine, check. Democrats moved $700 billion in Bush's direction on taxes, check. (He) gave up vouchers a bit too quick but got the Democrats to agree on testing and school accountability, check. Environmental record is actually good, but (he) has fumbled the politics of it -- perhaps the only area of real concern. On the 'bipartisanship' so beloved by the Beltway crowd, he's charmed both the press corps and a large segment of Democrats -- while sticking to a pretty conservative agenda -- and smiling all the way."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bill Press
Co-host, 'Crossfire'
'The Spin Room'
"(The White House) has so successfully lowered the expectations for George W. Bush, that even if he's just standing up in 100 days, he will be considered the greatest president that ever lived."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bill Schneider
Senior political analyst
"I think he's set the right tone for the new administratition. (It's) modest, open, very different from the tone of the Clinton administration, less self-aggrandizing, less conspicuous in his involvement in every issue. Best of all, he's been very selective about his agenda. He's chosen a few items, like education and the tax cut, to focus his attention and concentrated on those priorities. In other words, he knows how to prioritize. On the other hand, his handling of unexpected events has been a little clumsy. The Kyoto agreement was very poorly handled; he was very dismissive, shocking our allies and resurrecting the image of the ugly American. China, I thought, in the end, he handled well, though there was a little unsureness at the outset."

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/bush.100/stories/report.card.html

After shaky start, Bush gains public approval
By Randy Lilleston
CNN Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- George W. Bush had to fight to become president. After he took office, thanks to lingering questions over the election and his predecessor's slow withdrawal from the spotlight, he had to fight to be considered presidential.

But at the 100-day mark of his tenure, that issue seems to be fading. Bush enjoys high job approval ratings -- higher than Bill Clinton at a similar juncture in his presidency -- and even the question of vision that plagued Bush's father does not appear to be an issue.

"People said that the president did not have a mandate -- that he won't be able to govern," White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer said Monday. "Because of the manner in which the president has toned it down in Washington ... a tremendous amount of progress has been made within these 100 days, and the progress that is laid out now is going to lead to more progress later."

In a CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll taken April 20-22, Americans gave Bush a 62 percent approval rating. That figure compares with 55 percent for Clinton in 1993 and 58 percent for Bush's father, former President George Bush, in 1989. And 74 percent of Amercans say Bush has a vision for his presidency -- an important number, given his father's problem with the "vision thing."

But at first, the mere assumption of the presidency looked to be a struggle for Bush. On Inauguration Day, one of the most lasting images was of Clinton at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland, holding one final campaign-style appearance in an airplane hangar, hugging and talking to friends and taking a rather relaxed approach to climbing on a military jet and leaving Washington.

News networks gave the extended departure significant airtime -- in part because Bush was at a congressional luncheon at the time. But the cameras came back to the new president just in time to see him climb into his limousine for a trip down Pennsylvania Avenue -- where his car was hit by a thrown egg while tens of thousands of protesters made their feelings quite clear.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/bush.100/stories/overview.html



U.S.-China plane collision gives insight into how Bush handles a crisis
By John King
CNN White House Correspondent

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In the hours after the U.S. Navy EP-3 surveillance plane made an emergency landing in China on April 1, President George W. Bush was debating options with his national security team and raised this question: Should he pick up the phone and call Chinese President Jiang Zemin?

National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice advised against it; it would create an air of crisis, she argued, especially if the call failed to secure the release of the 24 crew members and the return of the plane. "Accident, not incident" was the administration's motto at that moment, and it was decided a leader-to-leader call was the wrong approach.

The collision was the new president's first major international affairs challenge -- one he faced with a new team whose members had little experience in dealing with China. And they were taken aback with each passing hour by the hard line taken by Beijing.

"We were very surprised," Rice tells CNN now. "Because from our point of view, this was an emergency landing of an aircraft that had been rammed over international airspace. And so what we really expected was that the Chinese would probably look at the plane and then return the crew."

But Sunday gave way to Monday, and China said the crew would be held pending an investigation.

"We began to realize that something more was going on here and that somehow the Chinese had decided to make this a different kind of issue with the United States," Rice said.

World affairs intrude into domestic policy

Bush's father, former President George Bush, wrote in a farewell note to his successor, Bill Clinton, that world affairs have a way of demanding more and more of a president's time despite any careful effort to focus on domestic policy in the early days of a new administration.

The death of 18 U.S. armed services personnel in a firefight in Somalia was Clinton's early test. Bush has faced several already, including:

• An escalation of violence in the Middle East.

• Concern from some European allies about the Bush administration's plans for a national missile defense system.

• Strains with Russia over missile defense and the Robert Hanssen spy case.

• The disappointment of South Korean President Kim Dae-jung at the Bush administration's decision to take a more cautious approach toward engagement with North Korea.

Bush also has tried to make his mark in the international arena during his first 100 days. He traveled to Mexico first to symbolize a commitment to improve relations with nations in Central and South America. Breaking from Clinton's hands-on approach in the Middle East, Bush made clear he would not try to set a timetable for peace or force a process on the Israelis and Palestinians, a shift many Arab leaders have privately criticized.

Bush skips 'hoop-de-la'

But the standoff with China stands out because of the high stakes, and for the glimpses it has offered into the way the president and young administration handle crises -- from the discussion over whether Bush should call his Chinese counterpart to the decision over how to handle the return of the surveillance plane crew.

Some advisers suggested Bush travel to Washington state for a ceremony at the home base of most of the crew members upon their return. The president decided against going, and White House press secretary Ari Fleischer recalled Bush explaining his reasoning during a meeting in North Carolina with the parents of Petty Officer 3rd Class Steven Blocher, one of the plane's crew.

"The president said to them, 'What's important is that your son come home without a lot of hoop-de-la,' " Fleischer said. "And what the president meant by that is that he could imagine no more joyous a moment than a man coming home to hug his wife and his child -- children -- a woman coming home to hug her husband and her children -- and not have to wait for a politician to finish his speech."
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/bush.100/stories/king.in.focus.html




Bush's 100 days -- the European view

LONDON, England (CNN) -- A hundred days of the George W. Bush presidency has left Europe shell-shocked at the robust conservatism of the new man in the White House.

He has worried European governments on defence and infuriated them on the environment.

It was never going to be a natural fit between Bush and the EU, where the majority of governments are led from the centre left.

His focus is clearly more on Asia. He puts business interests ahead of environmental issues. He favours unfettered markets where the Europeans are keener to regulate.

European leaders had hoped Bush’s natural conservatism and non-interventionist instincts would be tempered by the narrowness of his election victory.

Instead, after the instinctively-internationalist Bill Clinton they have found themselves faced by an isolationist president who has rejected international agreements on land mines, nuclear testing and an international criminal court.

Bush’s robust language about Russia and China, his defence deal with Taiwan and his resistance to the increasing dialogue between North and South Korea has some worried that he is a would-be Cold War warrior. For his part, Bush has been irritated by the forthcoming EU leaders’ visit to North Korea.

On the environment, it is not just Bush’s rejection of the Kyoto protocol on the limitation of greenhouse gas emissions which has worried Europeans but his way of doing it.

The EU had written to Bush only the week before insisting it was a key issue in EU-U.S. relations. But he brusquely pronounced the Kyoto agreement “dead” the very next week as the German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder visited Washington.

The Bush administration even questioned the science behind the Kyoto proposals and an EU delegation sent the next week to rescue something from the wreckage of hopes on global warming was brushed off with low grade meetings.

It could make for lively exchanges when Bush comes to Europe for an EU-U.S. summit in Sweden in June and for the G8 Summit in Italy in July. But the President has begun to sound a little more conciliatory, saying that he does take the global warming issue seriously and will look for ways of making progress.

On defence, European leaders remain nervous about the Bush administration’s plans for a National Missile Defence system which would involve scrapping the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and the U.S. is worried that plans for the new European Rapid Reaction Force will undermine NATO.
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/04/27/oakley.bush/





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. He sucked for 8 years. Other countries had no recourse.
We didn't either, sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'd say his worst days were the first 2,920.
But his last day was glorious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Jeeze. No one remembers those 2,920 days? And yes to the last one! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. we had some recourse
I was disgusted by the fact that Republicans did not get thumped in the 2002 Congressional elections. Instead it was mostly the other way around. The surplus was already gone, the economy was in a 'jobless recovery' and Bush was sabre-rattling with Iraq. Bush was clearly not the moderate, uniter, compassionate conservative that the media had sold him as. What was wrong with the American people that we did not throw the Republican party under the bus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. No one got thumped because the sheeple got played.
By the media. Effective, wasn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Worst 8 years of my life. Just as I was thinking we were moving forward..


..along comes this jackass and his cronies effectively bringing us back before the Magna Carta. Tearing up the constitution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_Carta


And after all that i have to watch a bunch of wing nuts question Obama'a citizenship?

I need to scream now.














Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes. How weird is that? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RFKHumphreyObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Yes, yes, precisely. You've said it better than I could
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. bush 1+2 was worshiped and feared.. Carter,Clinton,Obama ..go after them anyway you can.


The MSM standard operating procedure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. There is a reason for this.
Why did the PTB make certain that Bush became president? And why does the M$M see GOP presidents and Democratic presidents so differently? Through a different filter? It appears to me that it is so 'someone' can pull off a travesty like that of the eight BushCo years.

And any suggestion that the M$M doesn't treat presidents differently is laughable. The MSM almost worships Saint Ronnie completely ignoring Iran-Contra. And with every media jot and word they condemn Jimmy Carter and constantly boost the notion that he was weak in the face of the Iranians holding of American hostages. No characterization could have been less accurate, yet there it was.

I will never believe that Carter's attempt to free the hostages was not sabotaged by PTB operatives. And still today, this bullshit continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. You are correct ..its a fact Reagan operatives prevented their release.


Its no coincidence they were released once Reagan was sworn in.

The whole "Arms for hostages" was a big story ..until Reagan pardoned them all. The prosecutor was furious but nothing was ever done.

Same crew came back with bush 1 and 2... all because they were never held accountable ..now they were bolder. They would lie us into a war that would cost us more then a trip to mars and medicare for all.

Yet Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. It's such a disappointment
that this has happened to the country we cherish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Them Swedes MOONED his ass with 500 people to protest his Dufusness
He was fucking up royal by summer time.....1 month vacation?? Ignored serious warnings.....ran away like a scared rabbit during 9/11

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. 300 day review..has Obama fixed all the bush created problems from his double term yet?

"We report you decide"

Well its been a long 300 hundred days.. has Obama met the test? Did he deliver? Has he solved all and every single problem yet? We are sorry to say he has not. His report card ..not good. Up next .. a fair and balanced view of the Obama presidency.

courtesy of a future MSM


/sarc /humor /fiction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And some have the nerves to call it Liberal Media!
Not on this planet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I have noticed they seem to be giving up on that term "liberal media"
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 12:09 AM by wroberts189
Écouter FrenchieCat

Maybe its because of Fox news or maybe it because I do not watch enough tv. (I do not watch any actually..just youtube clips and such)

One thing for sure though .. the communist boogey man is dead. Now its the dreaded "socialism" or "socialist" ..queu in the evil dark music.


on edit knr


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. I hear the term Liberal Media at
least once a day. Most likely on C-Span's Washington Journal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. It's laughable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. thanks for digging in the memory hole
One thing about the Bush administration is the lack of Democratic resistance, in spite of Bush's popular vote loss. The moderate Republicans were told to get with the program and conservative Dems sorta fell in line too. One problem was that a tax cut is too popular to take a strong stand against it. With a little foresight, Congressional Dems might have tried to pass the bottom half of Bush's tax cut once he was declared the winner, and then they could fillibuster the top half of it. Instead they sorta settled for some weakening and for the rebate checks. They created delays in the tax cuts and also sunset provisions (I think, although that could have been more from 2003). The economy, although it was in a shallow recession, was still pretty strong, unlike today. Democrats also did not have the media to create protests about tax cuts for the rich, although I was writing a LTTE eviscerating Tony Snow's column shilling for the Bush tax cuts. That was only one voice crying in the Iowa wilderness.

Also, I remember Kennedy taking the lead in pushing through NCLB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Kennedy pushed NCLB, and then
once the bill was sent to conference,
it changed.
and then was never funded.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. The mediawhores really loved that prick didn't they?
They foisted Bush and his Iraq war on the American people and we're still paying dearly for those disastrous eight years and the mediawhores could care less.

Their next goal is to stop health care reform by any means necessary and get Americans to continue to pay through the nose for health care, if they can even get it...






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. They sure did.. to the detriment of all US citizens. Blue OR red. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. That ugly graph
illustrates why this country must have a single health care system. It also illustrates how things turned advantageous for 'for profit' health care under Saint Ronnie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RFKHumphreyObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. I remember how good those times were
The world was still basking in the warm glow of the peace, prosperity and progress of the Clinton years. It just seemed that everywhere I turned there was idealism, optimism and bright hope for the future to be found

And * and his clique succeeded in destroying and polluting everything they came into contact with upon taking office. I will neither forgive nor forget the actions of * and each and every one of his colleagues for destroying what we once had and creating the mess that Obama now has to clean up. And the vile apologists in the MSM are every bit as responsible and culpable through their stupid favorable exoneration and adulation of the former pResident and all his deeds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Yep..and you said that better then I could :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
23. It took Katrina to make the whores actually have to drop their slobbering
adoration or else they'd have to admit that they were just plain cheerleaders so that the billionaires would never have to pay another dime in taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
24. As sickening as it is to read, this is a
Fantastic post, FrenchieCat. This man, clearly intent on mucking it up for the world from the get-go, is given reprieve from review over and over again in his first year. Not only is this depressing to see again but its clear that Obama bashing is proportional to the breaks Bush got. Sickening. Thanks for the reminder. :thumpsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC