|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 04:46 PM Original message |
Is SOS Clinton pushing back to prevent being pushed out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. One day it's TOO MANY "czars," the next is NOT ENOUGH power for cabinet sectys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PretzelWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
2. whatever people. we have better things to discuss than this bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErinBerin84 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCoxwain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. smoking weird stuff cannot be too good for your health. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masuki bance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
5. "Downsizing" is replacing one person with many? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theoldman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Sounds like fuzzy math to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine1967 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. How did you come to that conclusion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
8. That makes no sense. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. Good. They need a strong vetting process because candidates fail to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC