Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Huffpo Must Read: Lobbyists on a Roll, Gutting Reform on Banking, Energy and Health Care

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 08:03 AM
Original message
Huffpo Must Read: Lobbyists on a Roll, Gutting Reform on Banking, Energy and Health Care
Arianna Huffington
June 25, 2009

Lobbyists on a Roll: Gutting Reform on Banking, Energy, and Health Care

Remember all that change Americans voted for in November? Well, there's been a change in the plans for change.

The detour has come courtesy of a familiar nemesis: DC lobbyists who, this year alone, have watered-down, gutted, or out-and-out killed ambitious plans for reforming Wall Street, energy, and health care.

The media like to pretend that something's at stake when a big bill is being debated on the House or Senate floor, but the truth is that by then the game is typically already over. The real fight happens long before. And the lobbyists usually win.


Last year, 15,000 registered lobbyists spent more than $3.25 billion trying to sway Congress. This year has brought even more of the same. Oil and gas companies spent $44.5 million lobbying Congress and federal agencies in the first quarter of 2009 -- more than a third of the $129 million they spent in all of 2008, which in itself was a 73 percent increase from two years before. Medical insurers and drug companies are also digging deep: 20 of the biggest health insurance and drug companies spent nearly a combined $35 million in Q1 -- a 41 percent increase from the same quarter last year.

All that spending has proven to be money disturbingly well spent.

Take energy policy. President Obama arrived at the White House promising prompt and far-reaching policies on climate change. But the energy bill currently winding its way through Congress, officially called the American Clean Energy and Security Act, is in danger of becoming considerably less, uh, clean. As HuffPost's Ryan Grim reported last week, the coal lobby may be on the verge of a big victory -- essentially gutting the Clean Air Act by taking away the executive branch's authority, through the EPA, to regulate carbon emissions at the nation's dirtiest coal plants.


Which brings us to health care and the reform-killing armada currently steaming towards Washington. Their attack is shaping up to be unprecedented. For example, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has pledged $100 million to defeat reform -- while, of course, calling it reform.

Much of the battle will be focused on the so-called public option, which the American Medical Association has already given a cold shoulder to, telling Congress it "does not believe creating a public health insurance option... is the best way to expand health insurance coverage and lower costs." Indeed, the AMA has been steeling itself for this battle. Since the 2000 election, it has doled out almost $10 million to congressional candidates.

And, again, this fight won't break down along Democrat vs Republican battle lines. Case in point: Tom Daschle. The former Senate Majority Leader, who came within a few unreported chauffeur-driven rides of being Obama's health care reform czar, recently hinted that Obama would have to drop the public option. "We've come too far and gained too much momentum for our efforts to fail over disagreement on one single issue," he told ABC News.

Of course, as Daschle certainly understands, without that "one issue," there is no real reform. But that's the reform killer's M.O.: identify the essential element of any reform bill and remove it -- leaving behind a worthless shell.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/lobbyists-on-a-roll-gutti_b_220521.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. I Think I Just Heard That Obama Is Willing To "Tax" Health Insurance
to pay for the program. Anyone having link or more information... please DO put it forward. Chuck Todd just made a statement that went like this... "at tax, is a tax, is a tax, is a tax!" referring to the statement.

And from what I gathered, this was not a "capped tax" such as one only for those making "X" amount of dollars or "type" of insurance! If THIS is Obama's added explanation to his Public Option, I once again am unhappy!

Guess Ed Schultz will have more tonight if it's not covered here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Suspect this is the lobbyists' latest attempt to kill healthcare reform. Remember Obama said only
those making over $250,0000 will be paying more taxes. I expect he will keep his promise on this. Barney Frank uses that figure as well and reminds folks the cost of health care reform is $1 trillion over 10 years. Congress appropriated over $600 billion this year for DOD and War supplemental without batting an eye.

Frank says there are savings to be made in the defense budget--like the F-22's, for a start. Other industrialized countries citizens have universal heath care for the taxes they pay--we get to pay for a bloated military empire--pork barrel spending run totally amok!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Then you have it totally wrong. Obama said last night that it was "capped tax" end of story. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Please "Do" Excuse Me... I Just Heard This Today... This AM AND
I did ask for clarification! I DO know about the $250.000 tax he talked about, but that wasn't regarding health care from what I gathered. THIS is something about health care and I think the number used was $110.000 plus.

I AM NOT trying to "bait" anyone... just asking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Have not seen that figure. Assume 'capping' refers to Obama's capping tax deductions at 28%-like RR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is why the formation of a third party won't have much difference
unless the new party is somehow immune to lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC