by emptywheel
Cross-posted from
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/I'm going to get to what it means that the AP--purportedly the most neutral source of "news" out there--is
harping on the
Nico Pitney question. But first, check out what this "news" entity claims in paragraph nine of their story--presumably to meet the AP's requirement for false equivalency.
Grumblings about favored reporters are not unique to the Obama White House. There were suspicions — never proved — that President George W. Bush's press operations often planted friendly questions in his news conferences.
Never proved?!?!
They not only planted friendly questions in their news conferences, they brought in
their very own gay prostitute to ask those questions. Not to mention paying people like Armstrong Williams
to push their policies and
flying their favorite Generals around so they'd pitch the Administration line on teevee.
But in the false equivalency moral universe of the AP, allowing a reporter who has announced he's going to solicit questions from Iranians directly to pose one of those questions is the big scandal.
moreAlso worth reading:
My Head Almost Exploded.The Sanford E-mailsAh, Republican family values.
Edited to add link.