Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Citigroup intends to raise workers’ base salaries by as much as 50 percent this year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 08:43 AM
Original message
Citigroup intends to raise workers’ base salaries by as much as 50 percent this year
Edited on Wed Jun-24-09 08:55 AM by democracy1st
dayum I'm speechless,disgusted with these financial advisors and the banks



After all those losses and bailouts, rank-and-file employees of Citigroup are getting some good news: their salaries are going up.

The troubled banking giant, which to many symbolizes the troubles in the nation’s financial industry, intends to raise workers’ base salaries by as much as 50 percent this year to offset smaller annual bonuses, according to people with direct knowledge of the plan.

The shift means that most Citigroup employees will make as much money as they did in 2008. The company also plans to award millions of new stock options to employees in an effort to retain workers and neutralize a precipitous drop in the value of their stock holdings.

Like Citigroup, financial companies, like Bank of America and Morgan Stanley, are raising employees’ base salaries to try to shift attention away from bonuses and curb excessive risk-taking. So are banks like UBS and other European competitors.

The Citigroup proposals, discussed internally this week, present a crucial test for the Obama administration, which has vowed to rein in runaway compensation at companies that have received large taxpayer-financed bailouts. Citigroup has gotten not one but two rescues from Washington. Soon the government will assume a 34 percent stake in the company, whose share price has plunged nearly 84 percent in the last year.

Despite Washington’s new role at Citigroup, and public anger over big paydays on Wall Street, administration officials have little power to prevent the company and others in the industry from raising salaries for rank-and-file employees.

Kenneth R. Feinberg, the administration’s new “pay czar,” has the authority to set compensation for only the top 100 employees at troubled companies. The rest — which at Citigroup, means fewer than 300,000 people — can be paid as executives see fit, provided any increase does not rank them among the 100 most highly paid workers.

Outsize pay on Wall Street, particularly the industry’s bonus culture, is widely seen as having encouraged the risk-taking that led to the gravest financial crisis since the Depression. But industrywide, total compensation is expected to rise 20 to 30 percent this year, approximately to the levels of 2005, before the crisis, according to Johnson Associates, a compensation consulting firm. Total industry pay would still be below the record levels of 2007, but only a bit.

“You can say it is outrageous,” said Alan Johnson, the president of the firm. “But maybe it’s a little like the canary in the mine, and you say that things are getting better.”

Indeed, despite the simmering anger over Wall Street pay, some of the 10 big banks that repaid their federal aid this month — a big step toward disentangling themselves from the government — are gearing up to pay outsize bonuses. For many, profits are up, despite the troubled economy. On Monday, Goldman Sachs, which returned $10 billion of bailout funds, denied reports that it planned to pay out the highest bonuses in its 140-year history.

Mr. Feinberg, the special master for compensation, is the person who ensures that companies receiving federal bailout money are abiding by executive pay guidelines. This week, Mr. Feinberg, who oversaw the federal government’s compensation fund for victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, held introductory meetings with Citigroup executives and their counterparts at several other companies that have received two federal bailouts. He will start reviewing pay packages for the 25 highest-paid employees, as well as compensation formulas for the next 75, in the next two months. He declined to comment on Tuesday.

For months, Citigroup executives have sought guidance from the Treasury Department about how to alter compensation. But after reviewing the new rules, the bank determined it did not need Mr. Feinberg or other government officials to sign off on pay for the rank and file. While Mr. Feinberg can request information on the pay polices at financial companies that have received two federal bailouts, the companies can reject his guidance.

Citigroup executives are so eager to keep employees from fleeing, that in some cases, they are offering them guaranteed pay contracts. Managers began notifying bank employees of the proposed changes this week. They could take effect shortly.

For some Citigroup investment bankers and traders, the changes could mean salary increases of as much as 50 percent, depending on their position. Legal and risk management employees, as well as those in the credit card and consumer banking units, whose pay is typically skewed toward salary, rather than bonuses, are expected to receive smaller increases.

Citigroup executives said the changes were aimed at retaining employees. Some Citigroup workers have already left for small, boutique investment banks or large rivals that are not so beholden to the government.

Citigroup officials declined to discuss the issue on the record, given its sensitive nature. But they said that the changes would bring the bank’s compensation plan in line with the widespread view on Wall Street that bonuses were not one-time payouts, but rather a form of deferred salary. They said the new system would let them adjust bonuses more sharply to reflect employees’ performance.

Stephen Cohen, a Citigroup spokesman, said that any changes would be intended to adjust the balance between salaries, which are fixed, and bonuses, which vary from year to year.

Citigroup also plans to introduce a new stock option program later this year. Under the plan, it will award employees one stock option for every share of restricted stock they have accumulated. The program could open the floodgates for the release of tens of millions of stock options that could be cashed out over the next three years.

It is unclear what the strike price will be. But the hope is that the options program will give employees another incentive to stay despite offers from rivals.


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/business/24citigroup.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Time to assess social security on total compensation exceeding $500,000
We currently assess it on salary only up until 87,000 or so.
But for those whose total compensation exceeds $500,000 in one year, they should pay it on all of it (if they get stock options, it gets assessed in the year the stock is sold).

Tax rate should be higher after you hit some adjusted gross income. It's ludicrous you can make 10,000,000 (or 1,000,000) and be taxed at the same rate of someone making 150,000. You have more leftover income after paying for the basics (worth $30,000 or so - if you choose to live in a mansion, that's your choice) so a higher tax rate is fair.

Close the loop holes too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. I actually think this is a good idea.
THe fundamental breakdown in the regularoty framework was that employees were offered great rewards for putting money into high-yield financial instruments. There was a collective House of cards being built that was largely the result of no contraining value system.

Chacks and balances broke down largely because the debt and risk became someone else's resposnibility and where no one had the ability to get the bird's eye view necessary to see what was happening.


Look the folks on Wall Street are both very greedy and very bright. Talent cost money. More base pay and less incentive pay is actually a very good thing in the absence of the ability to manage exposure at the global level.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. This being GD P, I'm sure many will defend this.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. As opposed to GD?
Areyou saying we are more elitist here? or Moreso than Genedarl Discussion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. GD P has a MUCH more conservative slant than GD. I thought this was well established.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I have not heard that before... Anywhere.
Odd how that might have evolved if true. GDP was GD Primaries during the election cycle. I am not sure if it is more conservative. But I would expect that it is probably a bit more "mainstrea" in its thinking because we might tend to track events as they unfold through political lenses rather than idealogical ones. Does that translate into being more conservative? I dunno. I suspect, though I can offer no support for this suspicion, that we are probably more rational than exhuberant.

Maybe that is the difference, :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Start a poll on both boards. The characterization certainly didn't originate with me!
I don't agree with your analysis; so-called pragmatism ("political lenses") is itself an ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. ROFL
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Robber Barons just keep robbing. It's what they do. It's what they ARE.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC