Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Through the Looking Glass with the WSJ editorial page: Barack Hussein Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:30 PM
Original message
Through the Looking Glass with the WSJ editorial page: Barack Hussein Bush
Edited on Fri Jun-05-09 08:31 PM by depakid
Proving once again that the delusional right retains the capacity to render one speechless:

One benefit of the Obama Presidency is that it is validating much of George W. Bush's security agenda and foreign policy merely by dint of autobiographical rebranding. That was clear enough yesterday in Cairo, where President Obama proposed "a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world." But what he mostly offered were artfully repackaged versions of themes President Bush sounded with his freedom agenda. We mean that as a compliment, albeit with a couple of caveats.

So there was Mr. Obama, noting that rights such as "freedom to live as you choose" and "the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed" were "not just American ideas, they are human rights." There he was insisting that "freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together." There he was citing Malaysia and Dubai as economic models for other Muslim countries and promising to host a summit on entrepreneurship.

There he was too, in Laura Bush-mode, talking about the need to expand opportunities for Muslim women, particularly in education. "I respect those women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles," he said. "But it should be their choice."

Mr. Obama also offered a robust defense of the war in Afghanistan, calling it "a war of necessity" and promising that "America's commitment will not weaken." That's an important note to sound when Mr. Obama's left-flank and some Congressional Democrats are urging an exit strategy from that supposed quagmire.

On Iraq, he acknowledged that "the Iraqi people are ultimately better off without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein" and pledged the U.S. to the "dual responsibility" of leaving Iraq while helping the country "forge a better future." The timeline he reiterated for U.S. withdrawal is the one Mr. Bush negotiated last year.

The President even went one better than his predecessor, with a series of implicit rebukes to much of the Muslim world. There would have been no need for him to specify that six million Jews were murdered in the Holocaust if Holocaust denial weren't rampant in the Middle East, including Egypt, just as there would have been no need to name al Qaeda as the perpetrator of 9/11 if that fact were not also commonly denied throughout the Muslim world. There also would have been no need to insist that "the Arab-Israeli conflict should no longer be used to distract the people of Arab nations from other problems," if that were not the modus operandi of most Arab governments.

Mr. Obama also noted that "among some Muslims, there is a disturbing tendency to measure one's own faith by the rejection of another's," a recognition of the supremacist strain in Islamist thinking. He also included a pointed defense of democracy, including "the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed" and "confidence in the rule of law."

We doubt the point was lost on Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, now in his 29th year in office. All of this will do some good if it leads to broader acceptance among Muslims of the principles of Mr. Bush's freedom agenda without the taint of its author's name.

More: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124415818653786909.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oi. Talk about tunnel vision. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nonsensical
Do these people live in another dimension?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackeens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. "...a recognition of the supremacist strain in Islamist thinking."
So much of that article is comical, but this line caught my eye:

Mr. Obama also noted that "among some Muslims, there is a disturbing tendency to measure one's own faith by the rejection of another's," a recognition of the supremacist strain in Islamist thinking.

As someone born in to the Catholic faith I recall with amusement (and a sigh) how I was taught by nuns and priests growing up, that Catholicism was supreme, any other "so-called" Christians were mere infidels. Protestants, of course (because of Irish history) were the devil incarnate.

So, eh, seems to me like there might be a "supremacist strain" in more religions than Islam.

As for the President being in "Laura Bush-mode" - o..........kay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh yeah..
"So, eh, seems to me like there might be a "supremacist strain" in more religions than Islam."

I was never in a religion but if I had been I would just have to get the heck out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Every religion teaches that. Their religion is the one true religion.
Edited on Fri Jun-05-09 10:06 PM by vaberella
For centuries Catholics looked down upon other Christians and to be honest they still do if I have to go back to my High School religions class. Every Christian faith is looked upon as strange, confusing, twisted, and in some way vulgar. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush is beloved throughout the Arab world for the blossoming of peace and freedom he began,
and is widely respected for his strong stance against Israeli settlements and against the Israeli operations against civilians in Gaza. And we all remember how George Bush was the driving force behind setting a date for withdrawal from Iraq. Finally, Laura Bush, of course, is a famed women's rights crusader, having personally invented the concept of educating women.

The author indeed makes some very, very good points. This is the type of wonderful journalism that has led to the Wall Street Journal being one of the most respected voices in the healthy and vibrant newspaper industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Good...

...but doesn't it make your head hurt to do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Freedom agenda"?
Oh, please. Don't make me laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Bush Administration actually wanted war.
And they weren't satisfied with just Afghanistan and Iraq, they also wanted a wider Middle East war, one that included Iran. So................the article is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC