Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Huge growth" in Rachel Maddow Show ratings for May

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AlexanderProgressive Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 10:34 PM
Original message
"Huge growth" in Rachel Maddow Show ratings for May
Edited on Tue Jun-02-09 10:35 PM by AlexanderProgressive
Media Bistro
June 2

"The Rachel Maddow Show" once again out-rated "Larry King Live" in A25-54, beating the CNN program by 6% (247,000 vs. 232,000). This is the seventh time in eight months that "Rachel Maddow" has beaten CNN in the hour. "The Rachel Maddow Show" was the fastest growing cable news show in the hour in total viewers, up a huge 60% (895,000 vs. 560,000)

. "The Rachel Maddow Show" was also up 14% in A25-54 (247,000 vs. 217,000). "The Rachel Maddow Show" also out-rated CNN among younger viewers, A18-34 (80,000 vs. 51,000).


More: http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/may_ratings_msnbc_tops_cnn_again_in_prime_time_117961.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 10:38 PM
Original message
Good. She deserves the recognition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. Yes, she does. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebass1271 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. so only 247K people watched her show???
i am concerned. i want everyone to watch her show, Ed Shultz and Olberman.. i can't believe Fox has such higher ratings.. all they preach is Hate all DAY!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I believe that number was referring to the age demographic of adults
Edited on Tue Jun-02-09 10:44 PM by Kdillard
25-54 yrs old which are important to advertisers. Her overall ratings are 4x that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great news. Rachel has the best interviews. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. HER ONLY PROBLEM IS THAT THEY CAN'T SPELL SPELL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can't be true. Just last week DU wrote her off as dry, boring and disagreeable to Dems
Think I'm joking, do a search. This place is strangely schizophrenic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Just the glee club. The rest of us got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. no, they wrote her off as being a heretic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I know, some Obama supporters believe that no negative comment shall
be made about Obama. To Hell with objective reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Oh please. Just as President Obama is not above criticism neither is Keith or Rachael.
If something they say is wrong or slanted that deserves to be called out too and it doesn't make someone believe no negative comment shall be made about Obama. It is called a discussion board for a reason. Rachael will not be everyone's cup of tea and neither will Keith. Obama will make decisions that will make them unhappy or that they will give him kudos for if deserved. Rachael will make mistakes, as will Keith and Obama. I wish we could just celebrate good news without it degenerating into a game of insults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. I am going to guess that you mean "split personality" in lieu of schizophrenic.
Better known as dissociative identity disorder (DID). If that's what you are accusing DU of being, of course you're right. We have all kinds of personalities under this tent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Old habits are tough to break
Growing up - schizo = multiple personality; I still fall back on old lingo at times even though I know better.

I don't have a problem with "all kinds of personalities under the tent" (it should be a strength), though it does appear to be an issue of late. I think perhaps some people overstate their positions using loaded language, though this appears to be an attention getting ploy it often instigates serious arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. I also grew up with that understanding. As you said it is tough to break old habits. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. I think it was a small handful of posters, actually mainly one.
If it's the thread I'm thinking of...?

One poster saying she's finished because her ratings are waaaaay down. :eyes:

And a few in the peanut gallery agreeing. Ya gotta wonder where they come up with some of this crap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Yes, I think that was the thread
There was one instigator, but it was discouraging how many "me too" posters there were. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. No wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Go Rachel Go! I'm so happy when I hear about things like this
It warms my heart knowing how many people are fortunate enough to be listening and learning from Dr. Maddow every night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lordsummerisle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. She has a great show
I wish her all the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, that's gonna ruin some people's evenings
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:14 PM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wundermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. The only show besides KO that I look forward to watching...
Most others are background noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. But I thought "she has a bias" rofl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. And you know what that bias is, {wink wink}. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. And as Fox News demonstrates, nobody likes biased, flawed reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Glad to see the returning truthteller direction over Turley's relentless let's get Obama.
Her wrap-ups of facts, historical trends, and as intro to interviews and discussion are the best. The recent abortion as terrorism, the torture to get Iraq link, all were needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. Rachel is a great artist.
And she gets better!

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbral Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. I guess the "She's desperate, her ratings are tanking" meme was just so much flatulence. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Wouldn't celebrate just yet. Remember she's gone from 2 mil total viewers
to about 1 million. That she's up from her series low (May 15th) of about 700k is nothing to really celebrate. Hell, even reruns of The Office beat Larry King occasionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlexanderProgressive Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. She is not only up from her series low. She is up from April
Edited on Wed Jun-03-09 12:42 PM by AlexanderProgressive
Let's not be misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. They were using the October/November numbers when EVERYONE in the country was interested, and
comparing them to now, when most people in the country don't watch as much political talk, as it's not an election year.

Back in October/November every show's numbers were much higher than they are now, so those trying to point it to just Rachel Maddow are being disingenuous.

Viewed through the narrow lens of October/November ratings and current ratings, EVERY SHOW would be tanking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. I like Rachel's show.
keep on doing the work you are doing Rachel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. Good for her. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. I've been watching lately, but only because AI is done for the year
and usually the volume is way down or on mute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
31. Must be Fox viewers switching over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
32. Thank goodness!
I love Rachel and I was bummed out that her show was "apparently" not doing as well as it should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
33. I like Rachel. I like how she calls BS on both sides...
...something a few on DU obviously don't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
35. Good for Rachel.
Her show (yesterday?) that covered the security risks to medical personnel in clinics that perform abortions was brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
36. Rachel
at times I think she Is too critical of Obama but I consider her a good companion for Keith.And nice to see her beat CNN.

Like countdown she Is getting the 18-34 audence who watches Cable.

The rating system Is crooked.I am one viewer for example who doesn't have a nielson box to their TV.when I watch MSNBC I am not being added to ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
38. What's interesting is that while Rachel was up KO was down.
May 2009 was the first month since September 2006 that Keith Olbermann's "Countdown" declined against the previous year in the A25-54 demo. In May 2009, Olbermann averaged 323,000 A25-54 viewers, down 21% from his primaries-fueled May 2008 average of 408,000 (though up considerably from May 2007's average of 200,000).


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/02/may-ratings-mayhem-fox-ne_n_210500.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quidam56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
39. I like her, she does her homework.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
40. Rachael is a smart cookie. Her material is always interesting and well thought out.
I like her because she speaks her mind and communicates very clearly.

She doesn't try to be an air head like the rest of the bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC