Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN: Judge's ruling could reveal Gitmo secrets in late July

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 04:18 AM
Original message
CNN: Judge's ruling could reveal Gitmo secrets in late July


Judge's ruling could reveal Gitmo secrets in late July



WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. government cannot collectively seal its records in more than 100 cases involving the indefinite detention of suspects held at the Guantanamo Bay facility in Cuba, a federal judge ruled Monday.


A detainee walks inside an open-air yard at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, on May 31, 2009.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/02/guantanamo.detainees.records/index.html

The ruling in favor of detainees and news media outlets means some judicial records in the cases involving Guantanamo detainees could become public on July 29, a deadline set by Monday's ruling.

The government had tried to designate all of its responses in cases seeking indefinite detention -- whether classified or not -- as protected from public disclosure.

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan said the government request was too broad.

"The government's motion attempts to usurp the court's discretion to seal judicial records," the ruling said.

"Moreover, the public has a limited First Amendment and common law right to access the factual returns," it added, referring to documents filed in response to habeas corpus petitions.

While denying the government motion, the ruling gives the government until July 29 to determine what information in the factual returns is classified and therefore can be protected from disclosure.

"Today's decision is a victory for transparency," said Jonathan Hafetz, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union's National Security Project.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's too bad I have to cheer a decision that the government wasn't in favor of.
But I cheer nonetheless.

I supposed I should be anticipating and Obama administration appeal, given their current court track record. But I'm hoping not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC