|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 07:54 AM Original message |
With so many years on the bench, why is it that Sotomayors views on major issues are not known? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. Why to the right? Is it your feeling the the facts have a rightwing bias? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. If you believe the constitution grants a right to privacy or provides a wall between church & state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. In other words if she is a centrist on several issues she would more the court TOWARD the right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:32 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I hope we get a justice who considers the facts and Constitution first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
4. Deciding on the facts is what a judge is supposed to do.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:33 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Yep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
5. Have you read her rulings overturned by the SC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:36 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. That is 3 out of 150 cases so kindly don't preach to me about assumptions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:38 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Preaching? 3 cases are fact. Your assumption is based on what she doesn't say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:48 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I didn't say she would lean right, I said if she is a centrist in a few areas she would move the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EquallyExhausted (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 09:03 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. i think the point being made is that those particular cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 09:13 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. And I agree but we have a delicate balance on the current court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
11. HA! You're thinking that deciding cases based on facts is a BAD thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 08:59 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I said that would make her a good judge, did you miss that? I am talking about the overall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-30-09 09:10 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Graphic illustration: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC