will the credit card bill of rights punish those who pay on time?
Edited on Sun May-24-09 07:05 AM by Doctor_J
I heard a at dinner last night. Sounds like something O'Reilly/Fox News made up. Now those of us who pay in full each month will have no "grace period" - interest will be charged daily from when we purchase. True?
...then they will start charging a fee for each check you write. If we pay with debit cards, they will start charging more for that. If we pay with cash, they'll start charging a fee for cashing checks. They want their money and they want it now!
3. Just forget having a picture of Spaghetti Bobby
on your card and shop around for a small bank to do business with. All that marketing cost a fortune, as do those CEO bonuses and golden parachutes. I've found better interest and terms with small local credit unions and banks.
4. No - but then banks may decide to reconstitute lost revenue by restricting perks
Edited on Sun May-24-09 08:14 AM by stray cat
to those who pay in full each month. Right now we don't pay a think and we get freebees. So we are not getting punished by the bill but we may lose our grace period, freebees and may pay an annual fee for a card.
Overall people may be starting off with a little higher interest rates, but people who miss one payment won't be exploited. The thing is to be selective when you acquire the card in the first place. This is similar to what the states do with auto insurance. If the insurers had their way, the people who have occasional accidents wouldn't be able to afford the insurance.
11. No, those were baseless threats by the industry to prevent the legislation from getting passed
Limbaugh picked up on a NY Times article about the idea and went with it full force.
The fact is that competition is going to prevent something like this from happening. The pay in full people -- of which I'm part of -- will just switch to cash if they decide to do this. The card companies now have the option of earning the merchant fees off of my purchases or earning nothing from me at all. I think they'll choose the former of those options when given the choice. I also doubt many companies are eager to be carrying nothing but sub-prime borrowers in this day and age.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.