Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More errors in CIA interrogation briefing list

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:15 PM
Original message
More errors in CIA interrogation briefing list

More errors in CIA interrogation briefing list

By PAMELA HESS, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON – New questions surfaced Wednesday about the accuracy of a CIA document meant to settle who in Congress knew about severe interrogation methods approved by the Bush administration.

Three new errors appeared to emerge in the CIA's matrix of 40 congressional briefings on so-called enhanced interrogation techniques. Those techniques include waterboarding, a form of simulated drowning, which President Barack Obama has called torture.

<...>

Pelosi has been a frequent target of criticism from Republicans who are eager to argue that Democrats knew about waterboarding and did little to stop it.

The CIA chart states that a Senate staffer, Chris Mellon, attended a briefing on July 15, 2004. However, Mellon told The Associated Press that he left the Senate in April 2004 and did not attend the briefing.

On Wednesday, CIA spokesman George Little said the CIA has reviewed its record and agrees that Mellon was erroneously listed as having attended the 2004 briefing.

more


What are the chances the CIA lied? Looks like Pelosi has got a solid case:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. 1. Especially since raygun, the CIA *always* lies.
Edited on Wed May-20-09 06:37 PM by leftofthedial
2. Under repuke "leadership" they aren't competent enough to lie successfully, hence all the inaccurate records.


I'm no fan of Pelosi, but I'm on her side in this case. Investigate torture fully, and her knowledge, role, exposure or whatever will come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. More errors in the briefing lists ...
Senator Hugh G. Rection ...

Rep. Donald Duqq ...

Rep. Michael "Mike" Hunt ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Repukes are going to look like fools AGAIN
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. bush had the documents edited
like in the yellowcake saga.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. GOP --> put up or shut up! - Pelosi, the same goes for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. What an absurd way to run any organization. I hope Panetta straightens them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. CIA Briefing Document Lists Goss As Congressman -- Even Though He Was CIA Director At The Time

CIA Briefing Document Lists Goss As Congressman -- Even Though He Was CIA Director At The Time

Another day, another indication that the CIA briefings document that Republicans are currently trying to bludgeon Nancy Pelosi with is deeply flawed and unreliable.

The Associated Press yesterday spotted *(see late update below) two clear new errors in the document -- including one real howler we're kicking ourselves for not spotting ourselves:

1)

The CIA chart states that a Senate staffer, Chris Mellon, attended a briefing on July 15, 2004. However, Mellon told The Associated Press that he left the Senate in April 2004 and did not attend the briefing.

On Wednesday, CIA spokesman George Little said the CIA has reviewed its record and agrees that Mellon was erroneously listed as having attended the 2004 briefing.

And even more embarrassingly, 2)

The CIA chart also shows former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Porter Goss attended a March 8, 2005, briefing as a member of Congress. However, Goss was at that time the director of the CIA. He took that job in November 2004.

These are hardly the first pieces of evidence that the document is unreliable. Four Democratic lawmakers, including Pelosi, are now on record differing with the document's version of what happened. And as Greg Sargent reports today, Goss himself, who attended that 2002 Pelosi briefing is refusing to say that the CIA informed him and Pelosi that waterboarding had already been used -- the key issue in dispute.

more






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Proof that Factcheck.org is a Repub tool:
The facts behind the speaker's changing story about her knowledge of CIA waterboarding.

Pelosi's changing story? What about the lying CIA and the falsified documents they released?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC