Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time for a REPORT CARD. What GRADE do you give Obama?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:29 PM
Original message
Poll question: Time for a REPORT CARD. What GRADE do you give Obama?
School's Almost Out... and Obama's first semester is almost over. What grade do you give him?

Gave him less then an A? Post below on what you think he can do to improve his grade next semester.

Gave him straight A's? Post below on what he's doing to get such high marks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. He hasn't taken the final test yet....
Edited on Sat May-16-09 02:33 PM by lunatica
So grading him is rather foolish since we don't know much about any outcome. Besides, what are we grading? His looks? His parenting? His humor? His policies? Shouldn't we see what happens first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. What exactly would be his final test?
Edited on Sat May-16-09 02:34 PM by RoadRage
Deleting my response.. because it no longer makes sense due to you completely changing your message above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. OK. He gets an A in being a good looking man...
Otherwise I'd rather see some concrete outcomes to his policies before grading him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Hank Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. A in domestic issues (economy, etc.) , C in civil liberties, B in foreign policy
Edited on Sat May-16-09 02:32 PM by Old Hank
That's my take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's have one every week!
Every day!

Every hour!

NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. A on some, a big F on the Constitution
C plus for the average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. What part of the constitution
do you not think that the former Constitutional Law professor is following?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Choosing which laws to enforce is not an option for Presidents
:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."


Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.


Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleii.html#section2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. OK, I'll repeat RoadRage's question,
since you didn't answer it.
This time, please SPECIFY how the President is not enforcing the sections of the Constitution you unhelpfully cite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. I gave him an 'A'
I would have given him an A+, but I don't like the dog and he often leaves the leash attached to the collar when Bo is running around. Not very safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarah553807 Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. and the whole mustard on a burger thing was a total turnoff
Edited on Sat May-16-09 02:49 PM by sarah553807
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
58. Not to be snarky...
but I leave my dog's leash attached to his collar when he runs around. If I didn't, he'd run away (and he's a hunting dog, so there's no catching him)...what else should he do with Bo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. There's a nice fence around the White House. No leash! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Yeah, I guess that's true.
I was commenting more on the comment itself. I guess I didn't see the harm in letting your dog run around with a leash on. I do it everyday, and there haven't been any major mishaps (if you ignore nearly having my shoulder separated when my dog saw a cat).


Hey, btw, sorry I didn't give you a shout when I was in DC. I was there for about 48crazy hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. I know social schedules get tight when on the road!
Give me a shout next time!

And, yes, without a leash, you'll NEVER catch the dog!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can we grade on a curve?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Absolutely...
You can set your own criteria anyway you'd like.. most teachers do anyway. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Then he gets an A+
I can't think of anyone in Washington doing more good (and less bad) right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. B - afghanistan, torture, wiretaps, bailouts
I have problems with all of the above. On the other hand Bush-Cheney got a 0.0.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. He's pissing off the wing nuts and making them act even stupider than usual
That's worth an "A" to me anytime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
34. My sentiments exactly... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. He gets an Incomplete from me.
Let's see where the torture prosecutions, health care, Iraq withrawal and bank bailouts end up.

In the meantime, we should all make sure to give him some personal "tutoring".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Agreed! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Two months ago, I gave him an "A" but today, it's a "B."
The president is showing weakness on a number of issues that require courage, most of them relating to cleaning up the messes of Bush. He's simply not doing what he promised to do, and now he's essentially covering for the Bush administration on important issues.

If he wants to be compared to Lincoln or FDR, he has a long, long way to go. He seems too interested in running for Mr. Congeniality, and not interested enough in addressing some very serious wrongdoing by his predecessor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. F-?
Seriously.. someone gave him an F-?

That would be a grade I think i'd have given to him if he totally adopted the McCain Palin philosophies.. but since he's not gone near that.. I think it's probably an unfair grade.

I'm certainly glad that poster wasn't one of my college professors.. or I would have never made my way out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. lurker im sure ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. Are we grading on a curve?
Curve = A
No curve = C
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. quit kicking his constituents to the curb.
fulfill his promises...the ones that got him elected; i.e., out of Iraq, single payer health care, support for workers and their families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. No such promise of single payer health care was made nor got Obama elected
But you knew that, right? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. actually, the phrase was
"just like ours"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Did he promise single payer healthcare? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. I gave a C+, but it is really an incomplete
I think he has done a great job projecting an image as an intelligent, thoughtful leader, which is no small thing after all we have endured.

On Heath Care and the Wars, I give him generally low grades, SO FAR.

(If he blocks the public option, I would be tempted to give his entire term a fail.)

On torture and accountability, we have had mixed messages at best.

On gays in the military, a solid F.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. He's the one who suggested a public option.
His HHSS went in front of the committees to demand a public option. Why do you think he's blocking or would eve block a public option he's suggested and ran on as a candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
26. why is the majority so silent on this site?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. they don't have the stomach to argue, or, they are wise and realise it's a waste of time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. it would appear only 15% think
hes done absolutely nothing wrong..

and 46% give less than an A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. But 79% approve, and 5% disapprove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
83. I think that 5% is REALLY loud...
'Cause every time I come here it seems like 1/2 of the threads are about how Obama is more to the right the Bush was.. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Hank Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
81. What do you mean by "majority"?
I gave him a B and still disagree with him strongly on his handling of some issues, such as State Secrets invocation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
28. A-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
32. C.... he needs to work on transparency and accountability. Open government is an achievable goal.
Edited on Mon May-18-09 10:36 AM by blm
We NEED Obama to make this a priority as it effects every OTHER issue this nation faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
33. a report card?
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
36. A+
He's doing a great job so far and I don't have any real serious complaints. Whatever we might identify as his shortcomings and/or mistakes right now we may view differently later. Since the campaign last year, I've learned not to underestimate him and to generally trust that he has a plan and knows exactly what he has been doing. Frankly, I'm surprised that some people here are upset that he hasn't fulfilled all of his campaign promises on a lot of issues when he has only been in office nearly four freaking months! It's like some people have completely forgotten that he has had to spend the bulk of his time on economic issues so far but even so he HAS set a lot of things in motion that will, unfortunately take some time to see through to completion. I could understand some people's concern and frustration if we were going on 3-4 years and he was basically sitting on his hands (or taking multiple month long vacations) or if he came out, for example and announced that he now supports maintaining DADT instead of repealing it (which, for the record, I don't believe would ever happen). However, nobody I've talked to has reacted with quite the same level of alarm and hyperbole to any of his major initiatives/decisions as a lot of people here. Also, for anybody who believed that Obama is Progressive, well, he IS more progressive than McCain/Palin or any number of Republicans but for our purposes, sorry guys and gals, he is a CENTRIST (or maybe even slightly left-of-center- he seems a bit more progressive than Bill Clinton). Or maybe he should really be defined more as a Pragmatist- doing what he and his team believe are in the best interests of the country instead of adhering to any particular ideology. He pretty much spells everything out in terms of what his overall philosophy of politics/governance in his "Audacity of Hope" so anybody out there still struggling with understanding his *sudden* "un-progressiveness" on some issues might want to read it (or listen to it on CD- Obama narrates it himself). Saying all this may make me an "Obamabot" to some people, and that's o.k. if you think of me as such, but I definitely don't go to bed every night worrying about feeling safe in my own country again and that Barack Obama is as good of a President as we could've ever hoped for last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. How can someone with a rainbow flag give the person who
hasn't even stepped in over Don't Ask Don't Tell an A+?

:wtf:

You're either drunk or your head is in the sand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I think that you must have missed part of my post
Edited on Mon May-18-09 12:15 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
I pasted it here so that it stands out a bit:

"Frankly, I'm surprised that some people here are upset that he hasn't fulfilled all of his campaign promises on a lot of issues when he has only been in office nearly four freaking months! It's like some people have completely forgotten that he has had to spend the bulk of his time on economic issues so far but even so he HAS set a lot of things in motion that will, unfortunately take some time to see through to completion. I could understand some people's concern and frustration if we were going on 3-4 years and he was basically sitting on his hands (or taking multiple month long vacations) or if he came out, for example and announced that he now supports maintaining DADT instead of repealing it (which, for the record, I don't believe would ever happen)."

Furthermore, did he ever once pledge to immediately do something about DADT- as soon as he came into office? I don't seem to recall that being something that he pledged to do more or less as soon as he came into office but if you have a link to something I might have missed, I'd be happy to take a look at it. Yeah, I think it's a terrible policy that should've never been enacted and I can't wait to see it repealed but I don't really blame Obama for not making it one of his first/top priorities and never really expected him to. Plus, I'd rather see Congress be the one to change the law so that another wingnut President like W can't come along and easily overturn it with a stroke of his/her pen. Once Congress repeals DADT and by the time somebody comes into office itching to see it repealed, too much time will already have passed and plenty of people will have seen that the military is functioning fine with gays and lesbians serving openly and there simply won't be any impetus for re-instituting DADT or an outright ban absent some kind of theocratic revolution in this country that is simply NOT likely to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Oh, so you're fine with the continuation of government-sanctioned
workplace discrimination to continue, simply because Obama hasn't gotten around to it?

What kind of stance is that?

He can sign an executive order, and then let congress catch up if they're so darned busy to deal with it right now.

A linguist has already been fired on his watch.

How many more people are you satisfied with losing their careers until the president decides to get around to it? 10? 25? 100?

Obama is dragging his feet on this. There's no question about it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Where are you coming up with this absolutist stuff?
There are a LOT of wrong and immoral policies, decisions, actions, etc. out there that need to be challenged/addressed/rectified but I'm under no delusions about how the political process works and why all or most of these injustices and outrages aren't going to get fixed immediately/overnight- not by Obama nor anybody else we might have elected last year.
Obama has pledged to support a repeal of DADT and, at least at the moment, I don't have any reason to think that he won't press the issue at the appropriate time but I NEVER expected it would happen immediately. AFAIK he NEVER promised an immediate repeal of DADT and he sure as hell knows that he can't please everybody all of the time. With some of the hatred and venom being spewed at Obama HERE on DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, I, frankly, am GLAD that I'm not POTUS because apparently not even I would be able to satisfy every individual or group that has their own agenda and concerns (which is really every citizen if you think about it). I think that my previous post clarified- in no uncertain terms- my feelings about DADT and that I want to see it gone ASAP. But obviously Obama isn't going to do an executive order on this one for the reasons outlined in my previous post and I happen to agree that it's the best way to handle it. Once DADT is repealed, hopefully the people whom have been drummed out of the service can and will be able to re-enlist. The situation sucks and I have nothing but sympathy for the gays and lesbians whom are kicked out of the service solely on the basis of their sexual orientation but if you believe that Obama and anybody else who isn't frothing at the mouth demanding an immediate end to DADT is simply being a chickens**t and/or simply doesn't care enough about GLBT people, well then, fine, you can believe whatever gives you a healthy burst of self-righteous pride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. You are a grown-up
(with a nice sense of humor to boot :-)). Very well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. You lost all credibility when you actually typed A+
A+ means he has done everything or has done something unmatched like freeing the fricken slaves or initiating the New Deal.

Obama isn't a goddam A+ president four months into office. You can't be for real.

Not only do you need to get a grip and stop making excuses for Obama, you need to start using paragraphs.

If you think what you type is easy to read, no wonder you're not concerned about putting DADT on the fast track.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Actually, it says more about the people choosing that option
for whatever reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Well, you're certainly entitled to your opinion
Thanks for all of your positive, well-thought out, and truly heart-felt feedback! I look forward to having more conversations like this with you in the future. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. Did you forget the sarcasm smiley? cboy4 is acting like a real jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #55
70. I didn't feel like I needed it.
I thought that I laid it on thick enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #38
54. Thank you for your eloquent post and patience.
I've gotten really tired of some posters throwing tantrums like fucking children because Obama hasn't used an executive order to suspend DADT. This is a law that won't be overturned overnight. Several linguists have been discharged from the military just because of their sexual orientation. Some of these people specialize in Arabic languages which we need right now. National security is more important than being obsessed with what someone does in their personal life. I'm sure congress will realize that eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #38
68. Yes, actually, he did.
"Furthermore, did he ever once pledge to immediately do something about DADT- as soon as he came into office?

"AFAIK he NEVER promised an immediate repeal of DADT...

Yes, actually, he did.

November 29, 2007:
“If you are elected President, what concrete steps would you take to overturn ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell?’”

Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL):

Fourteen years ago, the Democratic Party faced a test of leadership, and our party failed that test. We had an opportunity to be leaders on the World stage in eliminating discrimination against gay and lesbian service members, to recognize the patriotism and heroism of the hundreds of thousands of gay and lesbian citizens who have served our country. Instead, we bowed to fear and prejudice. We were told that American soldiers weren’t ready to serve next to gay and lesbian comrades. We were told that our airmen, sailors and Marines would lose their “unit cohesion” if we implemented a policy of equality. And so, rather than embracing leadership and principle, we embraced Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell — a policy that is antithetical to the values of honor and integrity that our military holds most dear. Patriotic gay and lesbian Americans are now told that they may serve their country only if they hide their true identities. They are forced to live a lie as the price of risking their lives for their country.

Fourteen years later, the United States of America lags far behind. We lag behind our military allies, who are repudiating discrimination against lesbian and gay soldiers in ever increasing numbers — in Great Britain, Canada, Israel, nearly every NATO member in Europe — all with no impact upon military readiness and performance. And our politicians lag behind the American people, who now call for the repeal of Don’t Ask,Don’t Tell in super-majority numbers. It is time for a change.

As president, I will work with Congress and place the weight of my administration behind enactment of the Military Readiness Enhancement Act, which will make nondiscrimination the official policy of the U.S. military. I will task the Defense Department and the senior command structure in every branch of the armed forces with developing an action plan for the implementation of a full repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. And I will direct my Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to develop procedures for taking re-accession requests from those qualified service members who were separated from the armed forces under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and still want to serve their country. The eradication of this policy will require more than just eliminating one statute. It will require the implementation of anti-harassment policies and protocols for dealing with abusive or discriminatory behavior as we transition our armed forces away from a policy of discrimination. The military must be our active partners in developing those policies and protocols. That work should have started long ago. It will start when I take office.

America is ready to get rid of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. All that is required is leadership.
http://www.hrcbackstory.org/2007/11/senator-barack-obama-pledges-to-end-dont-ask-dont-tell-and-to-help-reinstate-gays-and-lesbians-kicked-out-of-the-military-due-to-this-policy/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #37
74. I just thought the same thing, just less snarky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
46. I gave him an A. Yes there are some things I disagree with. But overall, I think he's doing
a magnificent job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
springhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
47. Really?
That many A's? I have a hard time even looking at him these days. My grade is not based on his party but on his broken promises. I think he lied to us during the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #47
69. I dont think you paid attention during the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
48. A. IMO, he has been too soft on the GOPers, not strong enough on
gay issues and healthcare. Other than that, would have been A+.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
49. k
Edited on Fri May-22-09 10:07 AM by progressoid
edit: the "k" is for kicking not his grade. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
50. Some kinda B, maybe?
I suspect that keeping his powder dry will enable him to accomplish more later on, if he is so inclined...but there is more I want done now.

He's painted himself into a corner on marriage equality, for instance. Having repeatedly stated his alleged belief that marriage should be reserved for straight couples, he can no longer lead on that issue. I'm willing to believe him benevolent enough, though, to let it happen if others will lead the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
51. Incomplete. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
52. B+. He's done a lot of small things that have reversed some shitty Bush policies
and he's changed our world image almost overnight--world leaders suddenly wanted to be our friends again. Ending the federal funding ban on stem cell research and being crystal clear that science will dictate environmental policy, not the energy companies. Limiting the state secrets privilege (that's real small government, wingnuts). Lifting the abortion gag rule--and he's gonna get to name a judge to the SCOTUS, too.

I'll make it an A if we can close Gitmo and get DADT at least voted on, and an A+ if the economy completely rebounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
53. B+
In diplomatic relations, economic policy, and social policy, there's been a stark departure from Bush. He will get an A if he does more on many of these items: bank regulation, gets his public option in the health care plan, torture prosecutions, scrapping No Child Left Behind, and doesn't hold detainees indefinitely without charges and gets them into the court system instead of tribunals. We can't stay in war forever; there have always been organizations wanting to do us harm.

Obama inherited a total mess, and we can't expect everything done at once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #53
84. he definitely has a long road ahead...
But, i'm giving him a B+ as well for the past 4 months. I only shrudder to think where we would currently be with McCain & Palin stalking around the WH. Sotomayor wouldn't even be a glimmer.... and that is more scary than anything right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
56. A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
960 Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
57. Well, I don't think he's doing what he promised.
Still a vast improvement, but really disappointing. Voted C
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #57
75. EXACTLY: "still a vast improvement, but really disappointing"
My sentiments as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RFKHumphreyObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
62. A+
I have strong reservations about his recent stance on Guantanomo and his hesitation on holding the past administration accountable for its actions. But he's a new President coming to grips with the fallout from quite possibly the worst government in the western world since WWII and I think he's proceeding with caution and I give him credit for that. I think he'll assert his leadership in these two areas over time and America will be much better for it

Elsewhere, he's doing wonderfully. Cautious but steady and determined. He's getting adjusted to the office and will likely improve with time. And judging by how well he's done so far, I suspect we're in for a real treat

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Hi, RFK!
Edited on Sun May-24-09 10:26 PM by mvd
I understand the caution, but the Guantanamo thing is one of the things where he can do better IMO. I think some things will obviously take time, but other things need more of a clean break. I do agree that he should get better over time and not worse! And very refreshing to have him in office. I like the way he has the Republicans seeming like the party of No they are. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
64. B+
I would have liked a more vigorous approach on the stimulus. I think almost everything else is the most you can accomplish given political realities. Find me a president who hasn't had to compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr1956 Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
65. B so far
It is only the first semester. I want to see how he moves on DADT and torture. I have faith that he will earn an A from me in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. I think there's a good chance he'll get an A from me, too
Lately I have been a little disappointed, but haven't lowered my grade yet. Because nothing he has done has really surprised me that much, except for the Geithner nomination and Iraq policy. I think he'll get less cautious as he gets more and more successes and the public knows him for a longer time. An A+ would be very hard to get on this particular subject; that would be nearly everything on my wish list including helping end the death penalty and giving everyone the necessities, fueled by much higher taxes on the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
67. I voted C but i could vote B depending on how I look at it...
On the one hand: He has, to be honest, capitulated to the corporations on virtually everything. There are a few things that I like but by and large he is not doing what I believe needs to be done to get America really back on track.

On the other hand: He really seems to be trying to do his best with the tools given to him under the circumstances. He's had some notable successes and shows promise. I could give him a bit higher grade considering this. mho.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
71. C for the credit card bill, his treatment of detainees, the bank bailouts, and
Edited on Sun May-24-09 11:54 PM by LittleBlue
for his mishandling of Afghanistan (some day it will be a beacon of freedom in a troubled region *snort*)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaaaaa5a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
72. He gets an A+++++++++ from me!!!
Edited on Mon May-25-09 02:53 AM by aaaaaa5a

Sometimes we have to remember that most of the people on this board are left leaning progressives. We are not the majority. If Obama adopted all of the policies required here to make DU posters happy, the Dems would get killed in 2010. And Obama would lose in 2012 for sure!



Do you want to go back to Bush?


Do you want a repeat of the 1994 Congressional elections?


Do you want President Palin or Gingrich in the Whitehouse in 2012?




I'm glad Obama is smart enough to be "center left" instead of just "left." I'll take a President and a party that is "center-left" but can stay in power any-day instead of two years trying to make some people here happy, only to lose all power completely in 2010.



As of Saturday, according to Gallup the guy is at 64%! He knows what he is doing.



I wish some posters here were more politically savvy and spent less time living in their own little world. (That goes for RM and KO on MSNBC too!)


A+++++++++++ Obama is on his way to becoming the most successful Democratic President in my lifetime!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #72
73. I have the Golden Gate for sale
If you're interested. I mean, if you think Obama is center left, then you pretty much will buy anything?

At this point, he makes Bill Clinton look like Ralph Nader. Yeesh. If I could have my vote back, I'd have voted for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #73
78. If it had gone that way (Hillary)
We'd be reliving the 90's & absolutely NOTHING else. Get a grip.
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaaaaa5a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #73
82. HIllary??? Are you serious??? Not to rehash an old debate but......

Do you remember when Hillary tried to change health-care in 1993? What was the result again, I forget?


Do you remember what happened to the Dems in 1994 after just two years of Clinton control?


Do you remember what happened in the 1990s with NAFTA, minority incarceration rates and welfare reform under Clinton?


Oh yea, Hillary Clinton also voted to go to war with Iraq. How did that left wing progressive policy turn out?


Let me say it again. Obama is doing great. A President and party that can stay in power from a center-left position is much better than a party that governs from the "left" only to give rise to Gingrich and GOP control two years later.



Opinions of DU posters are not the majority. Obama is President of the United States, not DU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
76. I will say a B.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tektonik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
77. I gave a B, but really I'd give him an incomplete
He still has a ton of work to do, and there are still so many issues he has not even publicly taken on yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
79. B+ I'll give him an A when he pushes the employee free choice act.
He also needs to commit to pulling out of Afghanistan sooner than later, and I don't think he should loan the IMF money unless they dramatically change their policies.
Otherwise, he's making quick progress in all areas of the agenda he campaigned on and is bringing much needed change we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big_Mike Donating Member (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
80. I grade him a C in that he
has done some about an average job. In that, I mean he made some proclamations and acted on them, only to change his mind later (All aspects of Guantanamo, secret wiretaps, ending Iraq). I see these as changes required by acquiring more information, but if he hadn't proclaimed one thing early only to change later, it would have been better, IMHO.

No outstanding successes, no tremendous errors, simply a few bobbles.

C in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC