Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-Senator Graham Backs Up Pelosi: I Was Never Briefed On Waterboarding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 04:46 PM
Original message
Ex-Senator Graham Backs Up Pelosi: I Was Never Briefed On Waterboarding
Former Senator Bob Graham, who received a classified briefing on terror detainees during the same month in the fall of 2002 as Nancy Pelosi, was not briefed about the use of either waterboarding or enhanced interrogation techniques during the meeting, he claimed in an interview with me.

Graham’s assertion — his first public comments since the release of the intelligence document detailing torture briefings given to members of Congress — directly contradicts the document’s claim that he had been briefed on enhanced interrogation techniques, or EITs. Graham is now the second Dem official to deny on the record the document’s contents and raises questions about its claim that Pelosi had been told, which she has denied.

“I do not have any recollection of being briefed on waterboarding or other forms of extraordinary interrogation techniques, or Abu Zubaydah being subjected to them,” Graham told me by phone moments ago, in a reference to the terror suspect who had been repeatedly waterboarded the month before.

Graham is the only other Dem aside from Pelosi to get briefed in 2002, so they are both in effect asserting that no Dem was briefed on the use of EITs that year. The date of the next briefing was in February 2003.

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/torture/bob-graham-i-wasnt-told-about-waterboarding-or-eits-in-my-briefing/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which, of course means he was briefed... If it's a Republican it's lying it's ass off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bob Graham is a Democrat whose word is as good as gold. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yep, one of the best Democrats of my lifetime. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Definitely! If he had run, I would have voted for him over Obama
And I loves my Obama, but Bob Graham has always been my favorite Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. I wanted him so badly as Kerry's VP. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Me too! Actually, I wanted him as Obama's VP too! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. He should have been GORE'S VP
It would have been a whole different world....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I read it as Phil Graham! D'oh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Bob Graham?
Honest as the day is long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I stand corrected. I read it as the wrong Graham...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. I've done the same thing several times the other way
I think it's Bob Graham and it's not :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. shows how very little you know about politics, doesn't it...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, my goodness.
This is about to get interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Pardon me, but would you happen to have any
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. Only Kettle...
:popcorn: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. It will be interesting to see which side Senator Shelby comes down on.
Does he implicate him self in condoning torture or does he support Pelosi and Graham's assertions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimesSquareCowboy Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Remember, Graham's one of the only few who read the NIE on Iraq,
and on that basis voted against the war. So I think he's shown he pays attention when important information is provided to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. That's right! Thanks for reminding
us of that detail during those horrible times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I've always thought he was one who's there for the right reasons...
Edited on Mon May-11-09 05:25 PM by polichick
That showed when he read the NIE ~ they ALL should've read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, well well. Maybe good old Nancy was telling the truth after all.
Bob Graham is known as a straight shooter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. I always knew she was. The Repubs were too hot on this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinaforjustice Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. Senator Graham is Extremely Credible.
Graham was well known for keeping meticulous notes on everything he did in a day, including what he ate for breakfast, lunch and dinner. If he says he was not briefed on water boarding and other torture methods and Pelosi wasn't either, I believe him absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. This whole thing about Pelosi and selected Dems is ridiculous
Everybody DOES realize that by the Republicans trying to push this as hard as they are they are implicating themselves in patently illegal actitivies? If what Bushco was doing was totally legal and legit, then the smear doesn't even logically work. If they are trying to say that Pelosi, et. al are "guilty-by-association" because they were allegedly briefed on use of torture techniques being used on detainees, "enhanced interrogation", or whatever the hell they want to call it and they didn't "do" anything about it, then they are tacitly acknowledging what Bushco did (and what THEY themselves openly supported) was ILLEGAL and that they knew it was illegal and didn't do anything about it themselves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. This settles the issue in my mind.....Bob Graham is a straight up guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Senator Graham is Throwing it Down Republicans, Are You Picking it Up?
If Bob said that he and Nancy weren't briefed, then they weren't briefed. And unless I've completely misread the man all these years, he would have said something regardless of the consequences
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. Don't pour water on the Pelosi-hate threads. It's ALLher fault! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. Ain't that the truth. I hate when they do that to her. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. He said that a while back..
didn't matter then, and I suppose it doesn't matter now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomerang Diddle Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
26. Bob Graham is a good man! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
28. Well that ends that BS argument
Graham takes notes he would not have forgoten. Hell the guy has notes on what he had for breakfast that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
29. Actually the document never said they were briefed on waterboarding.
They were just briefed on interrogation tactics and NP said clearly that it was the possiblity of it's use not that they were told exactly what was used or that it was currently then being used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
33. I hope this officially shuts up Turley.
What an arse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Don't count on it!
He's milking this for all he can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. huh..yeah. I'm not holding my breath. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Pelosi is the one who needs to keep her trap shut!
Her statements are getting more and more incredulous everytime she speaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Huh? Nothing she's said has been contradictory or wrong.
And if you look at this thread, it states Graham supports NP. So Turley, if anyone, needs to shut his trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
36. Put them all under oath and ask again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
37. I'll say this much - Bob Graham is one of my favorite Senators - well respected
If Graham is backing her then I believe him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
40. "I do not have any recollection of being briefed on waterboarding . . ." The words
"I do not have any recollection of" are legal weasel words. And I don't care if Jesus H. Christ said them himself, they'd still be legal weasel words.

"I was NOT briefed on waterboarding . . . " is what someone who was not weaseling would say.

"I do not have any recollection of . . ." leaves one an out from perjury charges if evidence ever surfaces to show that the statement is false.

Just sayin'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Nobody, even Reich-wingers, have ever questioned Bob Graham's honesty.
Not to mention the fact that he is somewhat famous for keeping meticulous records of his day to day activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. That's wonderful. Then he should say "I was NOT told about water-boarding or other
blah blah blah." He's using the I don't recollect cover.

Even men of great integrity sometimes find themselves in compromising positions where they "fudge". Maybe Bob Graham would not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. It is the sort of information you would remember, isn't it?
My reaction was the same as yours. It is not as if they were briefing him about the uniform color or the type of aircraft used to fly to Gitmo. It is the kind of information that when you hear it, you tend to remember exactly where you were and what the room looked like. Sort of like remembering where you were when you heard JFK or Reagan was shot or the space shuttle went down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. Yes, or as in this case, information that you DIDN'T get briefed on.
So, here we are in the middle of this War on Terror, and the top Congressional reps are being briefed in a top-secret, hush-hush meeting about what's happening with the people we are capturing, and Bob Graham cannot categorically say "I was not briefed on those techniques."

Okay, I'm done. Point made.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
centristgrandpa Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
42. finger pointing
So the old GOP is trying to sell themselves as the new political watchdogs of yesteryears, what’s wrong with this scenario? Reaching for new heights, repub nation is returning from political jumbo to hysterical revolution, so telling when conservatives are leaderless and clueless at the same time. The blame game is the only thing left for them GOP gofers, how pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC