Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What should President Obama do about Don't Ask Don't Tell?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:29 AM
Original message
Poll question: What should President Obama do about Don't Ask Don't Tell?
Edited on Sat May-09-09 11:30 AM by ruggerson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. I want to see DADT removed but I want it done correctly
An executive order deciding not to enforce a law he doesn't like isn't right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think its the top thing he should focus on at the expense of health care,
economy, jobs etc. I think there is a way to do it over the next 4 years that isn't stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Are you serious?
4 years to take down the "no fags allowed" sign?

It's simple. Health Care is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I reluctantly agree
We need to focus on on a few other things first. I do think that "political good will" and "political capital" are hard facts of life in politics. Timing is always key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, and *never* spent on gay people
Enough already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It never ends, does it?
Edited on Sat May-09-09 12:52 PM by muffin1
I'm going to have to stay off of threads like these from now on, I fear.
It makes me so angry that so many liberals are willing to overlook equal rights when they apply to gay people.
As though it's different than any other kind of discrimination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Has the constitutionality of DADT been tested in the courts?
It would seem to me to be the best way to end this discrimination. I know we don't have the numbers we need on the SC but that will change when we get new justices.

I truly think a good case can also be made that discrimination against gay people in the military is a national security issue. Now, that's my opinion. But I think it's provable nonetheless.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Many times, and the constitutionality has been upheld.
Most notably in Able vs. United States.

1998 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals decision
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. I knew it was a mistake to pul l up this forum
they're all here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. Yup. Present and accounted for.
This forum is poison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. *Not right this second* doesn't equal *never*.
You have to prioritize in politics, and in everything in life. That's all the president is doing, working off a prioritized list. I for one am fairly certain that it IS on the list. And for now, that is a good thing. A hell of lot better than when it wasn't on the list at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't buy this argument at all. There are hundreds of people working in this administration
and President Obama can't spare a handful to work on the DADT repeal? They seem to have plenty of time to work on other low priority items like faith-based councils and proclamations about Greek Independence Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. My sense is that it is Obama's political strategy not to get embroiled in social issues
because he thinks that will get in the way of passage of his health care reform and saving the economy. Not saying I agree with the strategy. I just think we can chalk it up to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Don't foget photo ops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. It isn't about time or manpower
It is about that battle bogging down the ability to functionally accomplish anything else. The rising tides that lift all ships must always be the strategic and primary steps. Gays need health care/insurance reform, clean, abundant, and renewable energy, jobs, and homes as much as anyone else. One may have special, even pressing needs but still remember that the whole raggedy house is falling down faster than anyone can patch it. Not much is worth the risk of handing power back to the Lords of the Morans. Things are way to precarious, the foundation far too shaky.

I expect the President will press this just as soon as he sees the brunt of the opposition fall completely into the quicksand, allowing their crazed squirming to finish them quicker.
I think the time is coming much sooner than later. I grant every moment a hurt but if you don't see why he wasn't fighting that battle while trying to get his budget passed aren't watching how this shit works. The issue energizes the nut job population and next thing you know you're having votes drop off because you can't apply the same pressure to keep folks in line. The Republicans though will march double time into their own trap, while divisive the fault lines are not where they expect. Americans are growing in acceptance seemingly by the week.

No doubt it is beyond hurtful for one's civil rights to be a calculated strategy in a game but this is the terrain we have inherited. Wherever we go from here we have to deal with where we are at first. When the results of "winning" the game are so demonstrably better than "losing", the game becomes an important end to the beginning of a series of actual steps in the right direction.

The mass American perspective is turning quick. If we can maintain this momentum the world will be a better place for one and all. Your service and you marriages in a time of renewal versus a saving grace in the midst of decay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
29. Still, there is the fact that LGBT people have been treated worse than anyone else in the party
Why should they be asked to wait until after everybody ELSE?

Why should they be at the back of the line?

LGBT people aren't THAT unpopular anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
32. Funny
I don't feel lucky. old adage: Talk is cheap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. Yup. Always drunk. You said it.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. Yes, because simply and easily repealing DADT is
just as gosh darn complicated as health care, economy, jobs and even etc. :sarcasm:

Please. Any idiot could get this done if there was the determination to do it now.

Government sanctioned work discrimination in the year 2009 is a disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. executive order..
short and sweet..get it out of the way, then legislate. Although I have read that it takes more than an executive order, because Congress legislated it. So..I'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. military legal experts have determined
that it's within his power to pen an executive order stopping the investigations.

This would effectively neuter the law, but not repeal it, something only Congress can do.

With the law unenforcable, they can then go about repealing it in Congress in a few months and he can then sign the repeal.

It'll be interesting to see if he tries this strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I dont know about an executive order
But whoever has the job of dealing with that in the military, surely there are more important things they could be assigned to do. I assume there are those responsible for investigating these issues. Perhaps they could instead be set to investigating, say, any torture/abuse issues involving the military. Or, say, contractors in areas supposedly under military control. Or contract abuse.

That could nullify the immediate problem so that he could work on getting legislation moving through the system to provide a more permanent solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. i voted for Executive Order...
I just don't think he will do it that way, especially since he wrote the letter to the woman in the military who will be discharged in a week or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Well Bush did set the precedent for it.....
don't like a law sign a executive order and by pass it.

Congress has to take this up, Obama can and should encourage Congress to take up repealing the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Work with Rep. Sestak to get his DADT repeal bill passed ASAP. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Can't executive orders be reversed?
If so, what's the point? Obama signs an executive order ending DADT, then 4 or 8 years later,(or whenever) the next republican president signs ANOTHER executive order reversing the first one. What's the point??? why not make it a law that cannot be changed or reversed? Bush abused executive order privileges. Obama doesn't need to do the same. With an issue like that, it's too important, and he knows it, even if you think he doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
argonaut Donating Member (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. There are more important things to deal with at the moment, IMHO.
Let's face it. I'm no fan of DADT, but it's hardly the most pressing issue in the world right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
24. Get rid of it as soon as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
28. If he can't lift the ban, he COULD issue an executive order barring the use of DOD funds to process
any DADT discharges.

He could also do an "essential position" exemption, which would allow him to bring back the cashiered Arabic translators that Bush forced out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
30. Push for a repeal in Congress and frame it as a national security issue
Edited on Sun May-10-09 03:56 AM by Hippo_Tron
Run ads calling every Republican who opposes the repeal weak on national security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr1956 Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
31. I voted for the executive order
DADT is not working and its not fair. Government service should be free of all types of discrimination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC