Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PA Senate Dem Primary Poll: Specter 57, Sestak 20

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:18 AM
Original message
PA Senate Dem Primary Poll: Specter 57, Sestak 20
Edited on Thu May-07-09 11:24 AM by MadBadger
ugh

Name recognition is still probably pretty low for Sestak...but C'mon PA Dems! The choice requires absolutely no thinking.

The poll was taken by a GOP Outfit so do with that information what you like.

Not sure if this was posted a few days ago, but somebody wanted to see a poll on the two 30 minuttes ago or so.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/05/poll-specter-has-big-lead-over-sestak-in-dem-primary.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. PA has a lot of moderate Dems. The question is, who votes in a primary.
Primaries tend to disproportionately represent the base of a party, not the moderates--but things can always happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I disagree with you. In PA, those moderates come out strong. Just look at the 08 Primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. That's only true if you consider Obama left of Clinton.
Edited on Thu May-07-09 01:14 PM by rug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. He is and I do. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Good for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. That can change quickly as Sestak gets more name recognition. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cornus Donating Member (720 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Depends on who's taking the poll
I responded to an email this morning to take part in a similar poll http://sestakvote.boldprogressives.org/p-boldprogressives At that time it was @ 80 to 20 in favor of Sestak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Actually there was a Dem -sponsored poll that showed
Spector with an even large margin over Sestak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. That's a straw poll, which is as good as an online poll. They arent scientific at all.
Edited on Thu May-07-09 11:56 AM by MadBadger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Can repukes cross over and vote in the primary? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. No, closed primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Thank you. i wonder if in this case that's good or bad. Maybe some would be so pissed at Specter tha...
they would have voted for Sestak to punish him. I guess it doesn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hersheygirl Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. If Sestak runs, I for one will be voting for him
along with my husband and daughter and encourage all democrats to do the same. I just don't think Specter can be trusted and it is time for him to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think this will CHANGE. The base of the party could easily be fired up for Sestak. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. Not bad considering the race hasn't started and Sestak has no name recognition.
There's plenty of time. What were Obama's numbers versus Clinton in May '07?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Y'all realize that Sestak is a DLC "New Democrat" like Evan Bayh? He's no liberal/progressive.
Edited on Thu May-07-09 12:10 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. He is still better than Arlen Specter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. There's still time for correction. Let's see which one moves to the left the most by Nov. 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. No matter what kind of Bullshit correction he offers, Sestak will always be ten times more reliable
Because one is a REAL Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. What's a "REAL Democrat"? Is it one whose vote saved Obama's stimulus bill?
Edited on Thu May-07-09 01:33 PM by ClarkUSA
I'm not into purity tests. As long as Spector starts flying straight, he's still our best bet to win the general election.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. He didnt switch because he disagreed with the repukes, he left because he couldnt win as one.
Thats why he isnt a REAL Democrat.

Oh, and Arlen welcomed himself to the party by voting against the budget.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/29/new-dem-specter-votes-no_n_193199.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. So what? His vote and lobbying saved President Obama's stimulus plan.
As for the budget, it passed. I'll bet he regrets that vote now and will be voting "aye" on everything from the White House
after this.

And that was before he was thumped on the backside of the head. He's also the most electable in the general election if
Gov. Tom Ridge runs. Sestak hasn't got a chance in hell of winning against Ridge. He hasn't much of a chance against
Specter in the primary, either.

All I'm saying is if Spector starts to vote no differently from DLC Sestak from now on, then there's no real reason for Sestak to
run. Sestak has said as much; he said he'll wait and see. So will I. All this sturm and drang may be a moot point by the end
of the year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. Keep in mind that one of the major reasons he could not win
is the minor fact that around 200k moderate republican voters switched to the democratic party, with most 'his' voters in the other party in a closed primary it makes quite a lot of sense for him to switch party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. The Thing to remember is that if he was polling at 50% instead of 30, he wouldnt have switched
He said as much himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Very true
Edited on Thu May-07-09 08:54 PM by Bodhi BloodWave
but that does not change the fact that the vast majority of the republicans that would vote for him switched to the democratic party tho, and he knew that he would have no chance being elected as a moderate with the majority of the remaining republicans in the state being far from moderate.

If i had been in office for a long time and i see a lot of my constituents change parties i would pay notice and look into things, and i would very likely act just as him, switch parties and continue my moderate route as my constituents would have wanted.

sidenote: my personal view is that all parties should be dissolved and people should be elected on issues alone without any party messing things us(tends to lead to party loyalty over issues and that in my eyes is wrong). This goes for both the US and for Norway(and likely most other countries as well, the US seems to need it more tho)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. A New Democrat is far, far better than a Republican. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. ConservaDem vs. Liberal Republican? It's all the same kettle to me. Exhibit A: Evan Bayh
In any case, there's plenty of time for Spector to move to the left. Sestak sure has begun to. If Spector starts to vote the
way we expect him to and if there's not a difference between his and Sestak's voting record from now on, then I will go
with the person best able to win the general election (Sestak is a loser in this regard at the moment, much like Toomey).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Sestak is a consistent upgrade across the interest-group ratings,
though he's by no means perfect. Here's a few in the format "Group: Specter Rating / Sestak Rating." Look through the links at the bottom to find more.

Planned Parenthood: 79/100
National Taxpayer's Union: D/F
US Chamber of Commerce: 100/60
ACLU: 43/91
NAACP: 21/92
Americans for Democratic Action: 30/95
National Journal Composite Liberal Score: 45/62
Secular Coalition for America: C/B+

http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=53340
http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=MPA08612
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Thanks. Let's see what it shows by the end of the year.
Edited on Thu May-07-09 02:34 PM by ClarkUSA
All things about equal, I'll go with the most electable Democrat. Hundreds of thousands of moderate Republicans switched
to the Democratic party in PA last year. All of them are Specter voters. I wouldn't underestimate their impact on the final
outcome, especially if Ridge runs. If he does, only Spector has a chance against him; IMO, Sestak hasn't got a chance.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Ridge isnt running
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. That's good. I just hope he doesn't change his mind like Toomey did. nt
Edited on Thu May-07-09 02:33 PM by ClarkUSA

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. If Specter improves dramatically, and if
he's doing much better than Sestak against Ridge in the polling, then I'd think he'd be a better choice. Neither are a sure thing this far out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. I concur on all points. nt
Edited on Thu May-07-09 02:33 PM by ClarkUSA


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. whats arlen ? haha. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Is it possible Matthews may reconsider and run?
He's got name recognition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Luckily things can change fast
in politics. Prez likes to mention that he was "30 points down" early on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. And Remember Lieberman
Lamont was way behind too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I'll toast to that.. "Remember
Lamont!" :fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Check This Out:
Quinnipiac University. 4/25-30/2006. Likely Democratic voters. MoE 3.5%

Lieberman 65
Lamont 19


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. That was April! Lamont's primary win was
precious and then lieberman's was specious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
38. The DINO is preferable to the RINO.
Specter is squirrelly and cannot be trusted.

Go Sestak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC