Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ed Gillespie: There wasn’t a single woman of comparable ‘temperament and intellect’ to Alito. (VIDEO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:46 PM
Original message
Ed Gillespie: There wasn’t a single woman of comparable ‘temperament and intellect’ to Alito. (VIDEO
Ed Gillespie: There wasn’t a single woman of comparable ‘temperament and intellect’ to Alito.

On “The Situation Room” this afternoon, former Bush counselor Ed Gillespie said that “it would be wrong” if President Obama looks at only women for potential Supreme Court nominees because he should be looking for “the most qualified candidates.” He explained that though Bush thought about nominating a woman to replace Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, he just couldn’t find one with the requisite “temperament and intellect”:

BLITZER: You remember, your President — President Bush — he did find a woman, Harriet Miers, to be his nominee, and that didn’t exactly work out. Did he get gun shy after that?

GILLESPIE: He did not get gun shy after that, but I think that in the next round of the selection process, the person who emerged as clearly most qualified — really head and shoulders above others –was Samuel Alito, and there wasn’t a woman who was of a comparable experience and skill and temperament and intellect.

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/05/06/gillespie-woman-justice/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh brother
that's all I have to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Orange Jeff Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. Why is it that they assume he's only looking at female candidates? nm
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. And the self-destruction of the Republican Party continues....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not one woman more qualified or smarter than Alito????
Can I have some of what they're smoking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. No, "comparable". Most professional women are more qualified AND smarter! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Quick, toss them more rope...................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. .....
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can't even remember what
alito looks like. I know roberts but what a fucking jerk thing to say..are there republicon women who would dare stand up to that jerkoff comment by ed gillespi?

I know some Dem women who could verbally take him down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh, really? Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikiturner Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. WOW
That is a stunning comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. but Alito came after the intellectual prowess of Harriet Miers....odd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. I bet it's by statements like that that you get all of the chicks, eh Ed?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. They had very specific standards for empathy, integrity & honesty.
Edited on Wed May-06-09 07:48 PM by baldguy
The new Justice couldn't have any of those qualities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, that's the prevailing attitude in our country about a lot of things, unfortunately. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SamCooke Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. I think he meant he couldn't find a conservative woman with those qualifications
I can believe that. In the Party of Palin, I can believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. what about Harriet Miers...or maybe Monica Goodling...or Sarah Taylor....or Susan Ralston
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Or Michelle Bachmann....or Virginia Foxx....or Ann Coulter.....or Dr. Laura
Hell, why not twin Justices Jenna & Tonic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undercurrent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. Poor Repubs.
They just can't help themselves. They're infected with stupid, and is becoming more unhinged by the day.

I'm having a great time watching them meltdown. hehe :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. Why does Ed use the word "temperament"????
"temperament" is a reference to one's emotional state ... and as we all know, the right is against any reference to considering that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Temperament is code for "women are too emoootional". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. I'm certain that somewhere a woman could have been found..
...who was every bit as corrupt as Alito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fugop Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. Shocking
I'm shocked and stunned that women are fleeing the Republican party. Really. Shocked. And stunned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. Watch the search committee close its eyes to 2+ generations of female law school grads...
... working their way up the ladder. Watch the search committee stick its fingers in its collective ears and go "La la la I can't heeeeear you" when reminded that there is a deep pool of female lawyers, many highly qualified, many with judicial temperament.

La la la I can't heeeear you. There are NO comparable qualified women. La la la.

Hekate
:argh:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. Ed, here's ten bucks, go shave your nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC