Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Democrats Deny Specter Committee Seniority

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:22 PM
Original message
Senate Democrats Deny Specter Committee Seniority

Senate Democrats Deny Specter Committee Seniority

By Paul Kane

The Senate dealt a blow tonight to Sen. Arlen Specter's hold on seniority in several key committees, a week after the Pennsylvanian's party switch placed Democrats on the precipice of a 60-seat majority.

In a unanimous voice vote, the Senate approved a resolution that added Specter to the Democratic side of the dais on the five committees on which he serves, an expected move that gives Democrats larger margins on key panels such as Judiciary and Appropriations.

But Democrats placed Specter in one of the two most junior slots on each of the five committees for the remainder of this Congress, which goes through December 2010. Democrats have suggested that they will consider revisiting Specter's seniority claim at the committee level only after the midterm elections next year.

"This is all going to be negotiated next Congress," Jim Manley, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), said tonight.

Without any assurance of seniority, Specter loses a major weapon in his campaign to win reelection in 2010: the ability to claim that his nearly 30 years of Senate service places him in key positions to benefit his constituents.

more






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Psych!
Just joking about you getting that seniority, Arlen! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. I guess so..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Heh. Sphincter isn't all that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's what you get, Mr. I'mNotALoyalDemocrat!
Hahahhahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ha! Take that, Arlen! Rec'd! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh Yass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good....no go sit on that Mr. "I didn't say I would be a loyal Democrat". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ooooh, stuck between a rock and a hard place. If he switches
back NOBODY will like him or vote for him. they'll think he can't be trusted.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. WELL Now... Senator... about that "Card Check" bill. . .. Oh yes,
and the Court seat?. . and the healthcare bill?

Have a seat Senator, we'll talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. He had that coming. Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hmm ... now how do you feel about Coleman being seated? n/t
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good! This is the exact opposite
of a thread I saw earlier that stated Arlen was going to keep senority..

<snip>

"Specter’s highly publicized switch rankled some in the party over an agreement Reid made with Specter that would allow the Pennsylvania senator to retain the seniority he earned through his five terms as a Republican.

*snip*

Specter claims that Reid has promised to recognize him in the 112th Congress with the same seniority as a Democrat elected in 1980.

*snip*

Democratic leaders tried to ensure that Specter would feel well taken care of. He sat at the leadership table, which is usually reserved for Reid, Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.), Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), said a Democratic senator in attendance."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8392201
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. mr "coleman must be seatedoopsI forgot which side I'm on Frankenmustbeseated"
ahole!

By the way I'd rather the senate dems get it right on banking issues than specter. But, I'll just enjoy what little I can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Very well played
Put the dip shit in the corner and let him think about 2010 for this session. The Jr. Senator from PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. After 2010 the former Jr Senator from PA
I don't think his little act is gonna play that well for PA Democrats in the 2010 primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Looks like Dems aren't as dumb as I thought. They're making him work for it!
Edited on Tue May-05-09 09:42 PM by Liberal_Stalwart71
Way to go, Dems!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. nice job by the dems. maybe they r coming to their senses nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Will Senate Democrats line up behind a primary challenge for Specter too?
Or will they blindly support a Puke that turned Democrat to save his political life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'd feel bad...
if I weren't so relieved. We caught a big fish, but he turned out to be a carp. Throw him back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. Good behavior should be encouraged - Good job folks!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. K&R
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
22. morning kick . . . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. This is good news, but they had to do it...
They couldn't push him past anyone already on the committees without causing a stink, and he undermined himself all week with his stupid remarks.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomaco-10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
24. FINALLY...
dems do the right thing. My question is though, why was specter so self assured when he switched parties that he'd be keeping his seniority in his committees?

A small miscommunication there I guess. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC