Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Torture: The Smoking Gun? (Andrew Sullivan)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:01 PM
Original message
Torture: The Smoking Gun? (Andrew Sullivan)
Edited on Tue May-05-09 09:02 PM by jefferson_dem
Torture: The Smoking Gun?

As more details trickle out, we have the possibility of a real breakthrough in accountability for the torture and abuse techniques authorized by president Bush as illustrated above. AP story here. Ambers:

Ostensibly, Yoo, an attorney for the Office of Legal Counsel and Bybee, that section's chief, were tasked by Attorney General John Ashcroft with determining whether so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" violated U.S. law and treaty obligations. But a draft report, prepared by the Justice Department's Office of Professional Review, suggests that, at the direction of the White House, the OLC worked to justify a policy that had already been determined and did not begin their inquiry from a neutral position.

It is not clear -- and sources would not say -- who in the White House communicated with the two lawyers about the memos, and it is not clear whether Yoo or Bybee felt unduly pressured to provide a legal framework for a decision already made by senior administration officials.

Who in the White House ordered up these memos to provide phony legal cover for a plainly illegal torture policy already decided upon? That's what we need to find out. From the leaks, this OPR report could be the next critical step in finding out the source of the criminality. In the end, it's Holder's call; and he may decide to take his time. My concern, now that we have ended the torture program, is simply that we get to the bottom of its origin, however long it takes, and that those really responsible are held to account under the rule of law and under the judgment of history.

This is not about vengeance; it's not about partisanship; it's about the integrity of the rule of law, without which we are all lost.

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/05/torture-the-smoking-gun.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Credit where credit is due: for a bible-thumping zomgislamofacism! guy....
Edited on Tue May-05-09 09:09 PM by BlooInBloo
Sully has been absolutely bang-up on the torture thing.

EDIT: For *anybody*, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He backed Obama, said he was wrong on Iraq, Bush. Actually, he endorsed Kerry now I think of it.
He is a conservative, most notably on economic issues, but I think he no longer buys into anything the neoconservatives are trying to sell, and hasn't in quite a long time.

I read him daily, so I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Let's not go too far with the accolades. He still things zomgislamofascism is the #1 threat we face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not really, And actually, he never uses that term anymore.
They ARE a threat, of course (are you denying that?), and as far as a hot war, as in our country being attacked, they are #1 (is China or India or Russia going to attack our shores? I don't think so).

I am a center Left type, and although I disagree with him all the time, I don't find his stuff overall being out there the way he used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Sorry - I'm not in the mood for the Put Words In The Other Guy's Mouth game tonite - maybe later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. There Will Be Zero Prosecutions
Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. How do you know? We are very early into this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. For Example
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What does that prove?
Edited on Tue May-05-09 10:11 PM by ProSense
That's the MSM blowing smoke. This is buried at the end of the article.

The results of the investigation were delayed late last year, when then-Attorney General Michael Mukasey and his deputy asked investigators to allow the lawyers a chance to respond to their findings, as is typically done for those who still work for the Justice Department.


They're creating the impression that the opinion is new and relevant in light of the release of the torture memos. From the NYT article about the draft (also buried at the end):

The draft report on the interrogation opinions was completed in December and has provoked controversy within counterterrorism circles, which has intensified since last month when the Obama administration disclosed four previously secret opinions written from 2002 and 2005, which for the first time detailed the approved procedures.


On edit: The Bush administration recommending that Bush officials not be held criminally liable for torture.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I Guess We'll Wait And See n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC