Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who is the most liberal member of the USSC?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:06 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who is the most liberal member of the USSC?
What do you all think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stevens hands down
but even he is no Marshall or William Brennan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. the President has mentioned Marshall as his favorite
Edited on Sun May-03-09 06:11 PM by Uzybone
I think we will get justices of similar leanings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. not how most court scholars see it
Edited on Sun May-03-09 07:46 PM by cali
they pretty uniformly consider Stevens, Ginsburg and Breyer to be virtually in the same place ideologically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. co-sign this post, entirely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ginsburg, followed by Stevens, then Breyer.
Edited on Sun May-03-09 06:12 PM by Gormy Cuss
edited to correct brain burp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who are the bozos voting for Scalia et al?
They don't realize the admins can see how you vote, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. We all fall to the temptation on these "polls"
Edited on Sun May-03-09 06:41 PM by whistler162
Especially the extremely biased polls that make the choices for you.


Just call me Mr. Kelly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. The admins look at how we vote?
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. They can. I'm guessing they have better things to do most days, though.
Some jerk posted an offensive poll a long while back. I forget what it was about, the Holocaust or segregation or something clearly hot-button. It had a few "offensive" responses in the poll, and some people voted for the offensive answers.

IIRC, a couple of people got shitcanned that night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Oh ok. Now we know. Some may vote that way just to be snarky, not that they really mean it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. i think the admins have a sense of humor. the only people they ts'd for a poll
were racists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Whoever just retired is the most liberal, according to Republicans
when there was talk a few years ago that Ginsberg might step down due to illness, I believe some in the GOP started calling her the most liberal justice in history... I'm not kidding.

But, I think she is the most liberal on a very conservative SC right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. There is not one liberal on this court!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayMusgrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You got that right! No one is on the court who had a hard time
Edited on Sun May-03-09 06:40 PM by JayMusgrove
getting money to go to college, to law school, or getting a good job, (except for the ONLY WOMAN!!!!)........

Yeah, we know how America has neglected and overlooked 1/2 of her talents for hundreds of years...and more people denied when you consider all people of color, of all genders, Michelle shows us that.

I think even we liberal progressive whatever Democrats that elected Obama need to think that the world will change momentously in 7.5 years while Obama is President, for one thing we will stop treating women, gays, blacks, browns, yellows and even purple people as second class citizens, will stop thinking that we cannot find 3000 people of any gender, any race any ethnicity to be well qualified leaders of America. In a nation of 300,000,000, or more, America has recently, (in the last 25 years)educated at least 1/100th of one percent of her people to be leaders.....and ethnicity and race and sexual orientation made no difference.

Only white men will have to prove themselves capable, something they seldom have had to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Now, that is racist
You can't just assume that a white male, even a white male who didn't "suffer" at any point in his life, cannot be a liberal. Political philosophy and life experience/race are not necessarily directly linked.

Similarly, there are non-whites who have had difficult lives who do not consider themselves liberal at all.

To assume a political philosophy based on race, is, by definition, racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayMusgrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hey, I am a white male.........I know what I went through
to get my Master's Degree, PhD, never did anyone question my ability to do so based upon my race and gender.

Get over it, hundreds of thousands of white males like me had it easy over the last 50 years...and you are the one assuming political philosophy based upon race, not me... I never said anything about political philosophy, I talked about all the people who never had a decent chance to be leaders if they wanted and worked to be so, and few, (if any), of them were white males.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes, you did
randr: "There is not one liberal on this court!"
Jaymusgrove: You got that right! No one is on the court who had a hard time getting money to go to college, to law school, or getting a good job, (except for the ONLY WOMAN!!!!)........"

Your response to randr implies your agreement that there is no liberal on this court because nobody had a "hard time". As I said, that is false logic.

I'm curious, though, what about what I said implies one should assume political philosophy based on race? I actually argued the exact opposite. It's strange you would come to that conclusion.

By the way, I agree that white males have had it easier than others, way easier. That's not what I'm challenging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. His logic means Kennedy and FDR weren't liberals. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. You have an exceptionally shallow and misguided knowledge of what racism is.
Racism is defined in terms of the structural marginalization and discrimination of people. White people in the US cannot be discriminated against in the context of this argument because they are overrepresented in the institutions in question (justice system, education, workplace management, etc.) and hold the reins of power in said institutions.

I find it pretty offensive that you weaken the significance of the word by throwing it around in such a cavalier manner, in addition to wielding it without actually knowing what it means. This says more about you than it does about the poster you are attempting to attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Racism
Edited on Sun May-03-09 08:05 PM by AJH032
Racism: The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race.

You're right, one should not wield the word without knowing what it means.

To assume ones political philosophy based on his/her race IS racist, by definition, regardless of which race we are discussing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Sorry, your little one line definition is still incorrect.
Edited on Sun May-03-09 08:18 PM by Runcible Spoon
But feel free to embarrass yourself further. :hi:

Oh, and I'm not buying your strawman misrepresentation of what JayMusgrove was saying: "To assume ones political philosophy based on his/her race IS racist, by definition, regardless of which race we are discussing." :rofl:

Edited to add user's name
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. ok
Don't buy it. What you think about me does not matter.

But if I ever hear a conservative, or anyone, look at, say, a black man making minimum wage, and say "oh, he MUST be liberal," I would be offended by such a racist remark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC