|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:16 PM Original message |
Hillary Clinton not pleased with NATO's rules of engagement against Somali Pirates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. I was on the phone and had the TV on mute - Secretary Clinton looked pissed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. Good. A lot of folks are pissed. You don't want the Skunk Eye from HRC. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. It would be interesting to see when the rules of engagement for NATO were written.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yes, she was pissed and the Somali pirates are f***k because nobody messes with Hill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. 'Bam and Hill are the Good Guys. So, it's not a good idea to challenge them or piss them off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. This pirate thing has gone on for too long. Someone must put a stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. I'm glad to hear this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
8. I'm glad Pres. Obama instructed his SoS to take this public position on behalf of the U.S. gov't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. You just don't let up, do you? I've no doubt they see completely eye-to-eye on this. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 01:32 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Who said they didn't? WTF are you talking about? Do facts bother you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 01:32 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
9. What is the point of NATO engaging with enemies if there are no rules of engagement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
10. On the radio they were making fun of NATO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'm curious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 01:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Not sarcastic...just to emphasize that our new SOS is not like our previous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 01:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Oh, OK.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
16. While I make no excuse for piracy, the world would do well to think of why it has been growing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC