Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Obama DO the right thing on document release and no Prosecution of those guided by them?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 06:36 PM
Original message
Poll question: Did Obama DO the right thing on document release and no Prosecution of those guided by them?
Edited on Thu Apr-16-09 06:41 PM by Perky
The disclosure was generally speaking a good thing.
THere is also a difference her between a "Nuremberg defense" (I was following orders)and the fact that DOJ signed off on the techniques. I am not excusing the torturers, but I an not sure they can or should be prosecuted in US Courts.

Maybe Ashcroft and Gonzo should stand trial either here or in the Hague. But that is not the question I am asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. no, those bastards should be prosecuted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. 'we simply must prosecute'
Yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's a great start, now lets hope that Holder does his job and we will be....
all ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Release was good and I am torn on prosecution
That's my write in vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Prosecutions will lead one place --- to the desk of GWB and former VP Dick Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. If prosecutions are in order after investigations it should be the ones who authorized it
If we want the real people behind it we should investigate at the top by freeing those given the dictates freedom to disclose the orders and actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamsterjill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. I agree - we need to go after the top.
Did anyone else see the exchange last evening on Countdown between Olbermann and John Dean?

I liked the points that they discussed. That being that if the Bush Administration gets off, that it essentially gives every new administration the "go ahead" to fill the justice system with only those justices who will interpret the laws in the way that they know the administration wants the laws to be interpreted.

In other words, the administration will do whatever it wants, and look to the justice system to provide the authority and justification for the actions of the administration.

I realize that each new administration appoints judgest that are like minded. But the Bush administration went WAY beyond that concept. And the Bush administration needs to be held accountable.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. There is no excuse for torture
Following orders is no justification. Not even those approved by a lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hell no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. I Don't Get It.
I know this is just a silly little DU poll, but how can 58 percent of DUers responding say that prosecutions are not viable?

Maybe the polling question is worded poorly, but hearing what is in the released memos, how can anyone think that there is not a case for prosecutions? More importantly isn't prosecution necessary if we are to restore our honor?

I feel like President Obama has punched me in the gut.

Bush-Cheney rules!!!

Say it ain't so, Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. A post by jberryhill
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8347953#8348249

"The DoJ cannot render a legal opinion stating "X is lawful" and then turn around and prosecute someone for doing X.

This is not exactly a situation of "following an unlawful order".

The DoJ officials responsible for the opinions have engaged in practice violations and there may be some hooks to get them.

But, otherwise, the Rule of Law can be a bitch.

Further - the Nuremburg prosecution was not the government involved in the underlying crimes, which is why that was not an "express opinion of authority charged with enforcement" situation.

You cannot, in the US, get a conviction in a case prosecuted by the DoJ wherein the defendant was told by the US AG that the action was lawful. It is a valid defense under US law.

If you don't like US law, then I don't know what to say to that.

To put it another way, the Nuremberg defendants were not prosecuted under Nazi law, either."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Bush Crime Family cannot get away with this.
They funded Hitler - and got away with it. They killed JFK, RFK, and MLK - and got away with it. They fucking CREATED Al Qaeda, and Poppy attended a champagne brunch with Osama's goddamn brother toasting their success as the World Trade center imploded - and got away with it.

When do these fucking criminals have to answer for their crimes? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's a disgusting, shameful travesty
Edited on Thu Apr-16-09 07:34 PM by LittleBlue
Both releasing the documents and prosecution are a must.

This was a joke. I can't believe 50% of progressives are for letting Cheney and the gang get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jewishlibrl Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. CAT: "An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification"
Article 2 of the Convention Against Torture:

Article 2
1. Each State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction.
2. No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political in stability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.

3. An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture.

http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/h_cat39.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Precisely. Those lawyers are now free.
Pres. Obama just contradicted the law!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Depends
As I understand it, he has not ruled out prosecuting the higher ups who authorized this. I am not as interested in prosecuting the on-the-ground people who did this as the ones who authorized it.

So, the jury is still out, so to speak, on my opinion on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. Other

The viability of the estoppel defense needs to be reviewed on a case by case basis, and I have to believe there is ongoing analysis and investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. If there's no prosecution, we owe a lot of people a lot of apologies
Everybody in the Nuremburg trials who claimed they were only following orders need to be apologized to because they did nothing wrong under the new paradigmm.

Every Japanese soldier who was convicted of war crimes and claimed the same or that their torture techniques were not torture needs an apology.

Tehre were several US soldiers convicted of torture in Vietnam who need an apology now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. this poll is deceptive because options 2 and 3 should actually be one option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. Other: Release was good and we need to make it very very easy
for other countries to bring charges against these people. While we might not get them at home making it impossible for them to travel because they will go on trial will get their attention and the attention of the rest of the hard core neo-con's who still think their ideology is the path for America to take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC