Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT-Obama's Plan To Cut Out Subsidies To Private Lenders And Offer Direct Aid - Where's Cable News?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:15 PM
Original message
NYT-Obama's Plan To Cut Out Subsidies To Private Lenders And Offer Direct Aid - Where's Cable News?
Where is the outrage directed at private lenders getting risk free profits at the expense of taxpayers? Where is our liberal news shows Maddow, Olbermann and Ed? Where's CNN? The NY Times has this great article on an ongoing political fight to cut out the private lenders (who had to be bailed out) and simply offer direct aid to needy students. This plan is meeting opposition from the student lending industry, Republicans, and some Democrats.

What happened to the outrage at lenders? It appears that cable news, even the so-called liberal shows, are obeying their corporate masters and holding back on expressions of outrage to focus on teabagging or expressing outrage on decisions after the fact.

Here is cable news' chance to get in front of an issue! Where are they? Or, is the marching orders to focus on decisions that have already been made or to give even more publicity to the corporate sponsored teabag protests?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/us/politics/13student.html?ref=global-home

/snip

WASHINGTON — The private student lending industry and its allies in Congress are maneuvering to thwart a plan by President Obama to end a subsidized loan program and redirect billions of dollars in bank profits to scholarships for needy students.

The plan is the main money-saving component of Mr. Obama’s education agenda, which includes a sweeping overhaul of financial aid programs. The Congressional Budget Office says replacing subsidized loans made by private banks with direct government lending would save $94 billion over the next decade, money that Mr. Obama would use to expand Pell grants for the poorest students.

But the proposal has ignited one of the most fractious policy fights this year.

Because it would make spending on Pell grants mandatory, limiting Congressional control, powerful appropriators are balking at it. Republicans say the plan is proof that Mr. Obama is trying to vastly expand government. Democrats are divided, with lawmakers from districts where lenders are big employers already drawing battle lines.

At the same time, the private loan industry, which would have collapsed without a government rescue last year, has begun lobbying aggressively to save a program that has generated giant profits with very little risk.

/snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here is cable news' chance to get in front of an issue! Where are they?
Oh look, a puppy!

Everyone loves puppies, dont they?


http://media.charlotteobserver.com/smedia/2009/04/11/23/531-puppy0412.ART_GT7E5TTC.1+Bo.embedded.prod_affiliate.138.jpg


Thats what has happened to this kind of real news reaching the public.

They distract with anything at hand so they can ignore the important news that doesnt present an industry (finance in this case) in a good light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I Guess We Have To Wait Until The Bill Is Passed, Then Express Outrage
God forbid that we draw attention to this handout to private lenders before hand. Instead, we will focus on puppies and tea bags, and complain how Obama is not a true liberal, progressive, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. The MSM is ruled by the big corps and they don't want this.
Its pretty sadly simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because anyone who doesn't hate Obama isn't a "true progressive"...
They've put all of their eggs in that basket. They can't change now - all they can do is hope Obama fails, in order to prove themselves right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC