Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Journalists Give The First Lady Full Marks at G-20

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Top Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:09 PM
Original message
Journalists Give The First Lady Full Marks at G-20
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 3, 2009; C01



The woman accompanying the president of the United States to London "has already created a sensation," Diane Sawyer observes.

"Everybody in Europe is enthralled by her," Meredith Vieira says.

"Millions of people are just watching Michelle Obama, wondering what she will wear, wondering where she will show up next," Brian Williams reports.

President Obama may be grappling with a global economic crisis and Russian arms control, but his wife has clearly stolen the show.

"She's a real breath of fresh air," CBS anchor Katie Couric said yesterday by phone from London. "I think Michelle Obama is very modern, very of-the-moment, and people want to get to know her better. She reaches out. She's a beautiful woman, stylish without being pretentious."

Oh, and have we mentioned her wardrobe? An MSNBC headline Wednesday morning announced: "Mrs. Obama Wearing a J.Crew Ensemble for First Events Today."

The Michelle gush-a-thon is growing louder by the day. To be sure, she is a fascinating first lady with a 76 percent approval rating in this week's Washington Post-ABC News poll. And presidents' wives tend to get softer coverage, at least when they're not put in charge of health-care reform. If they're dealing with swing sets and china, instead of swing districts and China, they generally hover above the fray.

But this first lady has generated endless media chatter about everything from her sleeveless dresses to her vegetable garden, which landed on the front page of the New York Times. And she has a disarming candor, telling the Times that she doesn't like her husband questioning her about her clothes: "It's like, Why don't you mind your own business? Solve world hunger. Get out of my closet.''

But this week's coverage has an over-the-top feel. If we didn't know Obama flew abroad on Air Force One, we might suspect she had walked across the Atlantic. The European trip has boosted her to an even more rarefied zone, with pundits debating whether she was wrong to have breached protocol by throwing an arm lightly around Queen Elizabeth II.

"I find it odd that President Obama goes to Europe and all the reporting I'm hearing is about how Michelle looks in J.Crew," says Eric Deggans, media critic for the St. Petersburg Times. "I feel like I'm drowning in it." For American reporters, he says, "if she's wowing the British press, that's the story. Don't tell me how cool you think she is."

Are journalists in danger of exhausting their supply of superlatives? NBC's Dawna Friesen noted "her Ivy League education and relaxed, easy charm. . . . She's been hailed by the fashion press as a modern-day Jacqueline Kennedy."

Couric reported that "all of Britain seems to be embracing America's new first lady," before tossing to a CBS piece on the Brits being gobsmacked that Obama doesn't carry a handbag.

The blogosphere is equally aflame. On the morning of the Buckingham Palace visit, Tina Brown wrote on the Daily Beast: "The excitement British women feel . . . is spiked with awe. She's so big-time. So self-confident. So devoid of rainy, British diffidence. In a country where most political wives and female members of Parliament are the stylistic equivalent of a tufted ottoman, Michelle's kind of striding self-assurance, glamour, and broad demographic appeal feels thrillingly 21st-century. The fact that she's African American adds an inspirational magic."

In a breathless account, the Chicago Tribune reported: "Changing into an elegant black-and-white Isabel Toledo dress from springy J.Crew pieces Wednesday in London, first lady Michelle Obama showcased her versatility and officially became one of the fab four of the political fashion world in the modern era -- joining Jacqueline Kennedy, French first lady Carla Bruni-Sarkozy and Princess Diana." Formidable company indeed.

The New York Post struck a contrarian note, saying Obama met the queen in "her office sweater. . . .Britain's sovereign looked fresh and spring-like in a pink dress, but Mrs. Obama, grin notwithstanding, looked more like she was on her way to a funeral."

The British press shed its customary snark. The Daily Mail said Obama "practically shimmered in the early morning sunlight," while the Evening Standard offered a culinary comparison: "Her mint green shantung silk skirt, sparkly silver mules and cute little sequin-speckled $298 (£207) cardie by US high street chain J.Crew were the equivalent of a granola fresh fruit plate: full of texture, with a dose of healthy colour on top. In contrast, Sarah Brown's ruffle-fronted dress . . . was perfectly smart, but about as exciting as a bowl of corn flakes."

The delicious coverage continued yesterday when Obama spoke of her upbringing on Chicago's South Side and CNN asked its hyperactive London correspondent, Richard Quest, for his reaction: "Michelle Obama is an absolutely extraordinary woman in an extraordinarily ordinary way. . . . She's taken the city by storm."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/02/AR2009040204045_pf.html

(I am so proud of our First Lady)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's not "over the top", howie..we've
Edited on Fri Apr-03-09 07:14 PM by Cha
just been on the bottom for so that being on top might feel "over" to you but not to those who were actually paying attention during the bush years..and that wouldn't include the whorepress.

Edit~ But, yeah, if the idiot press reported on Obama and the world this much it would be very much appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Top Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. its like opening the door in antarctica and seeing a meadow full of daffodils. that
is how this feels to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. She is our version of Princess Di.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Top Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. I loved Princess Di and I love our First Lady.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Very smart Lady we have, very smart indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not to take away from the amazing woman that she is, but I do believe
that most women who were raised with proper manners and taught self-worth and self respect and love and respect for others would do just as well. I meet women every day who would shine a thousand jewels over the supposed "upper crust" that we are taught to look up to. I love that we finally have a role model that every woman can really aspire to. She is not a kept woman. She has her own worth and own opinion. She is not an arm candy, ornamental figure... and her husband knows he's just a really lucky nerd to have such a wonderful woman as his wife.. and every day he must pray that he doesn't fuck up with such a wonderful person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Very well put! I hadn't thought of it that way, but I agree that many women we know in our lives
would shine in that position too, and would stand out against ladies who aren't raised to be independent women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. "whether she was wrong to have breached protocol by throwing an arm lightly around Queen Elizabeth"
FACT: she didn't "breach protocol", and those who should know -the Palace- have said so.

Will our "media" EVER manage to do a report with CORRECT FACTS only???

Probably not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. oh
I just knew that Howie would be really pissed about this....as I posted the other week, he got peeved for what he characterized as a "puff piece" in VOGUE about Michelle Obama. He is a bitter customer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is satire, right?
Edited on Fri Apr-03-09 09:25 PM by noamnety
PLEASE tell me this is a satire piece.

I thought it was ... but then I hit that "I'm so proud of her" at the end ... I'm just confused now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Why do you think it's satire? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. It's the sort of thing I would expect to see in the onion
to make fun of how newspapers report about women.

I haven't seen her speak, but I did go see Elizabeth Edwards in 2003, and she spoke about health care and other actual issues.

I'm at a loss to see why gushing about the color of Michelle Obama's wardrobe is considered a positive thing for the Washington Post, at a loss to see why people aren't pissed off about this.

(But if it was satire, I have to admit, it was very well done.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Albeit being compared to former fab women, Michelle is in a league of her own
Even as the former ladies, such as Jackie Kennedy and Princess Diana, were in a league of their own.

The only comparison that can be made is that they are all unique and trend setters in their own way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. Articles like this are wonderful to hear ..breath of fresh air compared to bushies...
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 12:34 AM by wroberts189


"On the morning of the Buckingham Palace visit, Tina Brown wrote on the Daily Beast: "The excitement British women feel . . . is spiked with awe. She's so big-time. So self-confident. So devoid of rainy, British diffidence. In a country where most political wives and female members of Parliament are the stylistic equivalent of a tufted ottoman, Michelle's kind of striding self-assurance, glamour, and broad demographic appeal feels thrillingly 21st-century. The fact that she's African American adds an inspirational magic."



indeed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks Howie.
Now I can skip your damn program Sunday morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC