Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How has Obama's performance so far changed your opinion of how you would have voted in your primary?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:10 AM
Original message
Poll question: How has Obama's performance so far changed your opinion of how you would have voted in your primary?
Another poll grading Obama's performance; with a twist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think Obama has done badly, but I would still vote for Kucinich. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm fine with your choice, but I'm curious.
Is there anything Obama could do to get your 'full' support?

I'm assuming bringing ALL of our troops immediately home would be one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Unambiguous, unqualified full support for my fundamental human rights would be a start
As long as he opposes equal marriage and instead favors Jim Crow "civil unions," he does not support my rights as a citizen and human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "Jim Crow"
I'm not sure that's the analogy I'd use, JMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Separate and allegedly (but not at all) equal
What analogy would you prefer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Jim Crow = rights of blacks
If you see a man across the street you know his race but can only guess at his orientation, which means the comparison is flawed right away. But it's a needless, unnecessary comparison, an awkward comparison. Why not just fight for your civil rights, why invoke Blacks? Just reference civil rights tactics. There's no need for and no comparison. Gays are fighting for civil rights. Blacks had to convince people of their humanity while fighting for rights. That humanity was the underlying justification for the rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. First off, look up the meaning of "Jim Crow"
From the lede of the Jim Crow Laws article in the Wikipedia:

The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws in the United States enacted between 1876 and 1965. They mandated de jure segregation in all public facilities, with a "separate but equal" status for black Americans and members of other non-white racial groups.

Some examples of Jim Crow laws are the segregation of public schools, public places and public transportation, and the segregation of restrooms and restaurants for whites and blacks. The U.S. military was also segregated. These Jim Crow Laws were separate from the 1800-66 Black Codes, which had also restricted the civil rights and civil liberties of African Americans. State-sponsored school segregation was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education. Generally, the remaining Jim Crow laws were overruled by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.


So you are totally incorrect: Jim Crow != rights of blacks. Rather, Jim Crow is the institutionalization of separation, which the Supreme Court ruled to be inherently unequal and a direct violation of Constitutionally protected civil rights.

Civil unions, domestic partnerships et al. were created specifically to be separate institutions from marriage. They exist only to keep marriage a special right for heterosexuals only, in exactly the same way that Jim Crow created separate schools, restaurants, hotels and even restrooms in order to keep many of these facilities for white use only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. lol - I'm not wrong
You're splitting hairs to make your argument. Clearly Jim Crow laws were used to suppress blacks civil rights - separate was clearly NOT EQUAL.

I refuse to have discussions with monoliths - g'bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. LOL. Kudos to you for trying at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
33. In much the same way that "civil unions" are used to suppress gay civil rights
Edited on Thu Mar-12-09 11:14 AM by TechBear_Seattle
But go ahead: run away while flinging insults (calling me a "monolith") without defending your point of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eryemil Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
51. Same. He's too good for America
To me Obama is the (much) lesser of two evils but he's far from what I would have wanted of a president if I still lived in the states.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. By the time the CT primary came along it was Obama vs Hillary
I would vote for Obama again and approve of his performance overall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
44. Hey, Jennicut. I voted for Hllary in the primary but would vote for Obama
if it were held today. But that is hindsight. I am looking at Obama with different eyes because I see what he is doing and I think he is right for the job.

I liked Hillary and JE a lot, but I of course got thoroughly disgusted with JE and became less thrilled with Hillary's organizational skills. Obama ran a great campaign and he totally won me over with his superb handling during the election. He was disciplined, smart and right. Once I realized that, it was all over for me: Obama was the person for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Hey! I always liked him and Biden the best with Hillary not far behind.That is kind of funny.
I thought Hillary was very intelligent and was ready to vote for her in the GE is she won the nomination. I thought of the primary fight as an epic battle between two warriors and tried not to take it so personally. I had moments where I was angered over something she did but really came to respect her fighting spirit. I just liked Obama more because of his overall vision of where he wanted to take the country and I am very satisfied with him right now. I liked JE in 2004 but found him to be not that genuine by 2007. None of the others stood out to me that much except Biden because I liked his sense of humor and straightforwardness in the debates. I was pleased Obama chose him for VP and not Evan Bayh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #47
55. Picking Joe B. as his VP was another example of Obama's smarts.
Joe is a decent guy and an outstanding senator on foreign policy, who could pick up a phone and call numerous heads of states and be conversant with them. Joe was needed to "beef up" Obama's foreign policy creds, showing that Obama is humble enough and smart enough to line up the best team possible for running the country. That impresses me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'd take any of our 8 announced candidates over anybody the Pukes sent
out there, just for a starting framework.

I could make a strong case for any of our original 8. Also, the Dems' debates were a sharper, more interesting, pertinent set of discussions.

Giuliani was not alone in behaving like a boorish oaf in the GOP debates, but he did more than his part in making them nationally embarrassing.

I would have been happy to have John Kerry as the nominee. When he stepped aside I supported Edwards. I voted whole-heartedly in my state's primary for Obama, as Edwards had dropped out. Again, if Dodd or Gravel or Kucinich had emerged as frontrunners, I would have made the same positive case for them against any Puke in the field.

Obama has been a great change and a refreshing uplift in his short time in office. I expect more reversals of Dubya's catastrophic administration and some new vigor in public discourse about common problems.

Whole-heartedly for Obama at present, with plenty of good will toward the man and his mission for the next 7 years and 10 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Flamebait n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. How is this poll flamebait?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Dredging up the primaries is ALWAYS flamebait. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. So is history. History is flame bait
And retrospect. Retrospect is just a open door for flame bait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Why should support for Obama in the primary be necessary for his support now?
The primaries helped Obama because he had strong opponents. If he had not had Hillary or others running against him hard he might not have won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. It's not. It's just a question.
No agenda here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I don't believe you, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rch35 Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
32. Well I don't believe you.
I like how some DUers think there is a constant and unrestrained effort to sabotage this message board at all times. every once in a while we get a freeper or two but most of the time its just internet paranoia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. Okay, so you're either an asshole, or you have a reason to not believe me.
I'm guessing asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. I was here during the primaries
and saw enough of this shit then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Enough of what shit? I have no fucking agenda.
I'm not telling people that Obama is better than there candidate, am I?

I was curious to see if people liked Obama more than the candidate they supported, or not. That is all.

You need to relax a little bit.

We're almost ALL Democrats here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. Voted for Biden in the primaries
And while I'd probably still vote for Biden, Obama has more than won me over too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. Voted for Obama at my caucus and I don't regret it
Even when I occasionally have problems with his policies, the other choices wouldn't have been any better. In fact, I'm fairly certain they would have been much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. My primary vote would stay the same.
Edited on Thu Mar-12-09 09:41 AM by Marrah_G
That in no way grades his performance.

I find it amusing that you think it would.

I like some of his choices and dislike others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. very true.
Edited on Thu Mar-12-09 10:40 AM by Aloha Spirit
I couldn't figure out what bothered me about this poll... but it's what you said, the choices have little to do with grading Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. They have everything to do with trying to label posters.
Yup- you got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
40. You're correct. Poor choice of wording on my part.
Sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #40
54. It's okay- I'm glad you clarified the intention of your OP.
For some of us nerves are still raw from the primaries and we still get knocked around because of our choice to this day.

My apologies for questioning your motives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. Still would've voted for Kucinich
DK was the only true progressive of the 2008 candidates.

I think Obama is doing a pretty good job though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
20. I voted for Hillary in NJ
and would vote for her again in a heartbeat. So, no it didn't change my opinion of Obama since I didn't vote for him in the first place.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. I think most people would stay the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
24. I have to laugh at whomever voted for Edwards and would do it again!
And I say that as a former supporter, but a lying skank is a lying skank and we already had one of those as President for the last eight years albeit a different kind of lying skank.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. yeah no shit!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
26. I voted for Obama in the primaries
I would again in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
27. Robb is a dingbat
Just sayin'...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. I couldn't stand Hillary but now I'm wondering if she would have
focused more on the economy and given us a better stimulus package.

I look at the great numbers coming out of China's stimulus package and it makes me wonder where we would be if we had a better stimulus package here at home.

Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. You don't think Obama has focused on the economy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
48. I don't think he guided the bill enough.
He left a lot of stuff that is dead weight. Like the tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. Are you one of the "he is doing too much" crowd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #38
49. No. I'm with the "he is scaring the crap out of the stock market"
crowd. That is what people really mean when they say he is doing too much. Mostly its the health care proposal and the tax increase that is freaking rich people out. I'm not rich, but they are taking me down with themselves.

Even my rich boss is cutting back on spending because everyone including him has lost so much money in the market.

And you do not want to know how much I've lost. I thought I built up a decent nest egg, but its pretty decimated. I was not prepared for a stock market that falls more than during the great depression. And I thought Obama would be such an excellent President that he would keep things from falling too much. I admit I let myself believe in him more than I ought to have. I bet my future on him and the Democratic stimulus bill and now I am paying the price.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzShellG Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
34. I voted for Obama in the primaries and WILL
Vote for him again in 2012!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
35. Dem's continue with "Single payer is off the table" and I may never vote for
any of them ever again.

Other than the good ones like Conyers and Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
36. I would have voted for Kucinich still, but..
I'm not sure I would still support Hillary over Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
37. I'm stickin' with the O man.
First president that I actually voted for in both the primaries and the general election. I have to take responsibility and stick with my guy through thick and thin--unless of course he really screws up--which he most certainly has not done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
45. I guess I'm just not understanding the purpose of this poll
What is your goal or what insight will this research give you?

No offense, but the primaries are over. I don't see what could be gained by this poll.
It's time for this Country to move forward, we have a President who is trying to do that.
No matter how anyone voted, what's done is done.

It's too early in this administration for me to honestly evaluate my vote. I don't see how anyone else could either.
Obama hasn't done anything to warrant that. Are there individual things that people may not agree with? Sure, NO president can please all the people, all of the time, or at anytime.

I just don't see what this accomplishes, other than, my guy(gal) is better than yours, etc., which as we know dredges up hard feelings from the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
46. I'm a Michigander, and you know about our primary mess, but...
... I voted uncommitted. My vote was -- at that time -- for Edwards who wasn't on the ballot due to all the mess.

But after having seen how Obama worked through the primaries, the general, and now his first few days in office, I feel that he was by far the best of all of our candidates. I don't remember whether he was on our ballot or not, so even if I got a do-over, it might still have had to be "uncommitted".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #46
57. Same here, voted uncomitted
and the uncommitted vote was for Edwards. IIRC, that's because my number one choice Kucinich was already out of the race. Kucinich was the only one "for" complete universal single-payer health care.

I like our primary process, letting small states vote early, delaying CA, NY, other big states. This gives an "unknown" like Obama a chance to get known. If we had "one big national primary" or a primary season with CA, NY voting early, I think early big corporate money would win. In 2008, that would be Clinton (which would not be a bad thing, just not as good as Obama).

Hopefully, MI and FL will get re-instated into the Democratic process before 2015-2016 primaries roll around. I don't think 2012 matters - we know who will get that nomination.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #46
59. Stamp me "uncommitted" too.
I am still sore at our MDP for
*ucking up the primary.

I am less than thrilled with
some of Obama's policies, ie..

FISA immunity,
Charter Schools,
Faith-Based Initiatives,
Most of his cabinet picks;
and his escalation of troops
in Afghanistan.

BUT, if he can help pass
the Employee Free Choice
Act and create a

National Health Care Program,

that provides healthcare for
everyone without necessitating
bankruptcy, I'll keep my mouth
closed in public about my disagreements.

Not here, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
960 Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
50. I voted for Hillary in the primary, and would vote for her again.
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 03:55 AM by 960
I was initially a Biden supporter, but he dropped out before I got the chance to vote for him.

Primary choice doesn't have anything to do with grading Obama.
He is doing a good job.

I do feel that Obama isn't managing the economy well enough, which would be one of Hillary's strong suits.

The same issue that sealed the General Election for Obama would have sealed the nomination for Hillary had the economy imploded 6 months earlier.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcindian Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
52. Obama was not my first choice or even my second.
But he was the one I voted in the primaries for and I think he is doing a great job and would happily do so again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
53. There were only two candidates by the time of my primary,
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 05:59 AM by mmonk
so I never get to vote for someone I like. So I voted for him instead of Clinton, but still got Clinton and all the Clinton people. I vote against Republicans. I don't get to vote for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
56. Voted for Obama in primary and general election, and I'd do it again today if I could.
He is the only candidate that I felt was capable of doing what he is doing right now - working on several projects at once despite the media/GOP attacks and obstructionism. He is THE president for THIS time, and that's it IMO.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
58. I voted for Hillary - not because I was enthralled with her by any means
but I trusted her more than I trusted Obama. I wouldn't change my vote but it has nothing to do with Obama's performance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agentS Donating Member (922 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
60. Did not vote in the primaries-
It was a Dem perfect storm. We could've thrown my neighbor's dog on the stage and he would've gotten more electoral votes than McCain/Palin.

Right after the Lehman Bros meltdown it was like 60, 65% generic Dem over 30, 34% generic Repub in some polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
61. Voted by mail for Edwards the day before he dropped out

You bet I'd vote for Obama given a do-over. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC