|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Captain_Nemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:26 PM Original message |
More Women for The Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. The Post should talk. 14% of their op-eds are written by women. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain_Nemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Marie Cocco is on e of the few feminist columnists who talks about facts of our underrepresentation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I like Marie Coco, and it was great when she'd be on Leherer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain_Nemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Clearly a woman cannot win the presidency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 11:16 AM Response to Reply #6 |
21. I don't think that's true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. An excellent concept. Why hasn't anyone ever thought of that before?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. "Would a second vacancy automatically go to a man?" - huh? why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
7. If I had my way, every Obama SCOTUS pick would be a woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain_Nemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Since we are 51% of population, how about 5 out of 4? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I think you mean 5/9 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain_Nemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 10:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. yes 5 out of 9..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. 5 out of 4, are you crazy? We can't have a bunch of women on the Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I'm not comfortable with that. It's seems like a quota system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain_Nemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Well, affirmative action was quite successful in bringing African Americans in to the workforce. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Unfortunately, it's become a numbers game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-04-09 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
12. I want the best possible person in there regardless of gender. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 10:57 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. The problem is that there are plenty of qualified people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain_Nemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 11:00 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Because around the world (according to UN report from August 2008) gender parity in government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
camera obscura (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 12:57 AM Response to Original message |
14. Just look at Obama's cabinet, I think diversity is the last thing we have to worry about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain_Nemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 10:53 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. But, out of 21 Cabinet posts there are only 5 confirmed women.....where's the diversity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 01:31 AM Response to Original message |
15. Ah,of all the women who should've been in the pool, Barbara Jordan still tops my list after 35 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Barb rocked. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
16. Anita Hill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
22. Sandra Day O'Connor was a great guest on The Daily Show the other night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I'm glad to hear that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eryemil (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-05-09 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
26. Insofar as females are more likely to hold liberal views, I agree n|t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC