|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 09:49 PM Original message |
Rachel Maddow's new set and feeling.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. ah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 09:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Thanks...will correct. I'm in and out with that word. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 10:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Is Rachel going to be in L.A. now???????????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-03-09 12:09 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I don't think so. I think she's there from time to time. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-03-09 12:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. "Wreak": irregular verb. Wrought, Wreaks, Wreaking. Wreaked/Wroken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
4. It's not a new set. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-03-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I know. I just prefer this set. She's been in LA before and never had this set. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AyanEva (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
5. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neecy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. I liked this set |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-03-09 12:11 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I agree. I had problems with the way the background was drawn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-03-09 12:24 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. I totally agree about the "Crayola" graphics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-03-09 04:25 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Lots of white. I think they wanted it to look like a web page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC