Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

how about a middle ground between fawning and bashing?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:45 PM
Original message
how about a middle ground between fawning and bashing?
I know people object to those terms. The people who are fawning say, why am I not allowed to support Obama? The people who are bashing some democrat say, why am I not allowed to criticize dems?

Well, I think it's extremely important to support dems, and at the same time just as important to criticize them when they do bad things. Just not take either too far.

What does "too far" mean? It's a judgment call, but I think there are clear examples where people take ordinary, even bad, things that Obama does and turn them into "genius" or a "smackdown" of republicans. And examples of people taking ordinary, even good, things, things that Obama was praised for, but which get turned into "caving" or "cowardice" when someone else does them.

The alternative I am suggesting is that when something is evaluated, that it be evaluated based on thought and not on some unrealistic ad hominem basis, either good or bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. "evaluated based on thought and not on some unrealistic ad hominem basis"
I think you're trying to shut down GDP completely with this sort of crazy concept.
;-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. ROFL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm with ya, man! I'm a Fasher and proud of it!
Or is it a Bawner??

I'll love when I have something to love and I'll hate when I have something to hate. So far, I've seen very little to hate and much to love from that man in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. yours might be better
I was going to call us Fashists. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eryemil Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. Remember kids, bawner rhymes with boner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jkshaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Perhaps we could drop the whole damn subject?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. There ya go~ Besides I have seen anyone
"fawn"..so there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Moderation is for jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. what about honesty?
suppose someone trashes Harry Reid for doing something and praises Obama to the heavens for doing the same thing.

Am I a jerk for objecting to this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Honesty is for unwashed bank robbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. OT. That picture totally cracked me up
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Brethren Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think for myself regarding politics.
I agree or disagree with any politician regardless of their party based on my judgment on them and their actions. Regardless which party a politician belongs to once they enter office they took an oath to protect our country and our constitution.....and to do their job. That is what I expect from them.




The Stimulus Plan ("American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009"): Orig. House version -- http://appropriations.house.gov/pdf/RecoveryBill01-15-09.pdf , House spreadsheet -- http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pV-c6t5fOVmNorqMpHvnCMw ; Senate version -- http://appropriations.senate.gov/News/2009_02_02_The_American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009.pdf ; and Senate compromise -- http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1 , Text and $$$ details of Senate compromise -- http://appropriations.senate.gov/News/2009_02_08_UPDATED_Appropriations_Provisions_of_American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act.pdf?CFID=4043629&CFTOKEN=40573040 in addition to -- http://readthestimulus.org/amdth1.pdf ; along with -- http://www.readthestimulus.org/ .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bullshit false equivalence. No point in reading anything else you say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. wow strong reaction
and rude, and undeserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Improvement. You went 2 for 3 on that last one. Keep going!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. How about we just let folks post the thread that they want and we can participate however we want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. "just let folks post the thread that they want"
Even if the thread is called; "how about a middle ground between fawning and bashing?"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes! Exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. How about we understand that this ain't just any President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. You're right...
Edited on Mon Feb-16-09 12:39 AM by ZombieHorde
He is the current President, which is the most important President of all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. WOW
WOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. How does racism against Obama justify trampling anyone who questions his actions?
Does he get a blank check because of this? Worse still, do you contend that any disagreement with any of his actions is some kind of latent racism? What is the point of citing this other thread of yours? Is this a cry to rally people or justify unquestioned, complete support across the board?

What's this got to do with ANYTHING?

Is bigotry against him from some other subculture somewhere else a justification to clamp down and reign supreme HERE?

What's this got to do with the habit some people have of crushing anyone who questions ANY of his actions?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLyellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
17. I prefer fawning with some rules applied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. Most people are in the middle ground
A few cannot find the middle ground if you dug a whole in it and buried them there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. seems like we have all go too much time on our hands
waste of time talking about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
23. Reasonable dissent is good, fawning is unwise in any form (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. bash the fawning and fawn over the bashing
Détente
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
26. what is wrong with both?
Let the fawners fawn - no problem.

Let the critics express their views - no problem.

The only problem I ever had with the fawners (your word - I think admiration for Obama is fine and can be constructive) is when they attack critics and dissenters, not for what they are saying but rather with insinuations of disloyalty or worse because they are expressing anything other than fawning. Were it happening the other way around, I would defend the fawners.

As for the critics, I sometimes agree, and sometimes disagree, depending upon the specifics of the argument. It is not all or nothing - for or against Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I really enjoy your posts, TA
Just want to let you know:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. thanks enigmatic
I really appreciate you taking the time to say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
28. I don't know about fawning but I do know that Obama needs our dedicated support.
Edited on Mon Feb-16-09 08:13 AM by olegramps
If President Obama has any chance of correcting the disastrous condition that the Republicans have left the in county in, he must have our dedicated unqualified support. Every attempt by the Republicans to discredit him must be met with unified opposition. If he has to compromise to met his objectives, so be it. I pledge that he will have my support. There is no doubt that we are in danger of being overwhelmed by the magnitude of the gross malfeasance and corruption that the Republicans are direct responsible for bring on the nation.

It is sad that at this time in my life that I have actually grown to despise so many of my fellow Americans. The Republicans no longer represent a voice of moderation and caution, but represent the most outrageous degrees of extremism. They have embraced the most radical elements of our society ranging from out right religious fanatics and radio propagandists spewing messages of hatred to a cadre of the most greedy thieving bastards that the nation has ever known. They even surpass the Robber Barons in their greed. Make no mistake, the Republicans are absolutely accountable for this near hopeless situation that has not only affected our nation, but the entire world.

If we are to have any hope of righting the ship, then Obama requires our dedicated support. The Republicans are drowning in the cesspool they have created and will take down the country with them if we allow it. They are desperate and have struck out against President Obama with a viciousness that has little parallel. The are so consumed with hatred and greed that they have shown that they are willing to destroy the Republic. Their refusal to support the necessary stimulus legislation upon which the very continuance of the nation depends makes them traitors. They believe that the millions that they have stolen will insulate them from the catastrophe that they have wrought.

A new age may very well be emerging in which they may well be held accountable. If the situation becomes desperate enough and the people enraged by the greed of crooks that have ripped off the working class an economic revolution could be in the making. The people may very well demand passage of legislation that will raise taxes on the wealthy to levels of 90 percent or more and inheritance taxes that will confiscate their ill gotten billions. It may indeed become a death tax. The death of the moneyed aristocracy that the Founding Fathers of the nation feared could replace the old aristocracy of privilege by birth. It is entirely possible that this may transpire if the situation doesn't improve. If it comes to this just make sure that when these bastards drown that you are standing on their heads pushing them under.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. How about DU'ers stop trying to qualify what others think, eh? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC