Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Talkingpoints Josh Marshall questions Gregg's reasons for withdrawal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:46 PM
Original message
Talkingpoints Josh Marshall questions Gregg's reasons for withdrawal
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 04:51 PM by flpoljunkie
GREGG?

Huh, I guess that didn't work out.

This is extremely weird. Gregg is out at Commerce, withdrawing for what he appears to be calling irreconcilable differences on Stimulus and the Census.

Now, the Census is one thing because Census administration is a pretty touchy issue between the parties -- largely tied to the Democrats' wanting to count everyone and the Republicans not. And I could sort of see where maybe this issue got dicey.

But the Stimulus? Didn't we have a pretty clear idea what was up with the Stimulus before Gregg got the nod?

Late Update: Hearing maybe that this might not be about Census or Stimulus but maybe Gregg not being able to hack the deluge of crap he was getting from what's left of the New Hampshire GOP.

Later Update: Here's Gregg's statement.

Still Later Update: Gregg is like the Bobby Ray Inman of Commerce Secretaries.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/02/gregg.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I figured he was getting enormous amounts of pressure from the GOP.
So he caves. I guess spines are in short supply in other places, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Evidently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. for whatever reason... (and contrary to the frames being constructed now..)
It's the quitter Gregg that looks like the loser to me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He did it to keep that seat red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Exactly. There's something else going on here, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Pull the CNBC interview. He was all for Obama's stimulus plan
He's a coward who dropped to his knees for the Republican machine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, somebody on TV just said it was all about the census. He insisted
he wanted to be in charge of the census, but the WH said THEY would be. The guy mentioned something I had forgotten about. The census is a very important project and redistricting depends on it!

As soon as I heard the word redistricting, I figured that was the real reason. Without redistricting, many of the remaining Pubs would lose their seats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. They are all showing their true colors. At the end of the day,
they are the losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. rec this thresd up . . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is getting good. Matthews isn't buying it either.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. look around here, Gregg seems to have BIGGER issues that that.
Like some lobbyist crap, and a wall st. madame problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC