Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rush ?'s Edward Nam service. He was born in 53 same as me. To young.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:28 PM
Original message
Rush ?'s Edward Nam service. He was born in 53 same as me. To young.
Rush is a fucking baffoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ass-Boil Boy questions ANYone?
How LOW will these fuckers stoop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-i-acs Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Second time he did this at least.
Either he's a clueless, drug-addled blowhard OR he's repeating this misleading mantra to cast some kind of doubts on Edwards.

Or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A boil that was his head up his ass. Vet doc could have fixed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Media Matters settles the matter
http://mediamatters.org/items/200409090002

(snip)

Edwards, who was born on June 10, 1953, did not face the possibility of being drafted until 1973, the same year the military draft ended. As the official website of the Selective Service System documents, a 1972 draft lottery "determined the order in which men born in 1953 were called to report for induction into the military." The SSS also notes that the 1972 "lottery was conducted for men who would have been called in 1973; however, no new draft orders were issued after 1972." As the Associated Press reported on October 26, 2003: "Edwards was assigned No. 178 for 1973, but the draft ended that year before his number was called."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AgadorSparticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. so much for rehab........this guy is a wreck. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, somebody call in
and tell Rush he is an idiot. It would also be an appropriate time to mention Rushes a$$ cysts which were the reason he couldn't go to Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rush dodged the draft because he had an ANAL CYST
He is soooooo not one to talk!!!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Edwards is not a chickenhawk and he never attacked Kerry
or any other veteran on their service as the republicans like bush and cheney do. fuck them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. limbaugh got out of vietnam by using his ass pimples to get deferment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC