|
disaster relief *could* be, if bu**sh**'s past performance is any guide.
Yesterday, somebody made a post about trying to blame bu**sh**'s environmental policies (global warming) for hurricanes - and especially Ivan. Yes, that was a somewhat callous focus on the political implications of what could be - if it hits N'awlins - the greatest human tragedy this country has seen on probably over a century. Tens of THOUSANDS could die, drowning in a toxic soup of chemicals, sewage, oil and water, simply because they're too poor to leave. People rebuked the poster for even *thinking* of trying to take political advantage of such a tragedy. Rightly, I think... but it also started me thinking... bu**sh** has a history of using even the most horrific events both for his own political gain and to "reward" those who support him, and "punish" those who don't. Witness the fact that he has consistently shortchanged "blue" states in homeland security funds, even though those areas (particularly NY and CA) are at greatest risk for terrorist activities, while Wyoming is so awash in counter-terrorism funds they can't figure out how to spend them all.
IF Ivan hits New Orleans, what would bu**sh** do? In the first place, LA has a Democratic governor and Dem. senators - not to mention that New Orleans' heavily Democratic population contributed a great deal to those Democratic victories. Would bu**sh** drag his feet on disaster relief to insure that the infrastructure is still so crippled that those people won't be able vote in November? Or would he rush relief through in the hopes of earning their "gratitude" (and votes) in November? I don't know... but, like I said, while hurricanes aren't political, we have absolute PROOF that bu**sh**'s response is likely to be, and it both worries and infuriates me. The fact is, I honestly don't believe the so-called-man has enough human decency to NOT use such a disaster to his political advantage. What do you think?
|