|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:27 PM Original message |
Rachel Maddow gives the most hard-hitting interview on television. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. She also blasted Obama and the Dems for watering down the bill for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Good for her. Somebody had to it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yep. She causes their tongues to tie in their mouths before her viewers' eyes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 12:06 AM Response to Reply #2 |
19. Yes, and she does all that with a great deal of charm and no hint of disrespect, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
20. BA from Stanford in public policy. A Rhodes Scholar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
3. Her show has been great tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
4. You are right! She is very good...viewers are not used to someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
5. So the love/hate index for Rachel is heavy on the "love" today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
6. He lied when he said he'd be back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. i think he'll be back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. His lost his credibility, imo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robeson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. That was most excellent. She was lying in wait for everything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
8. The secret is that she is VERY smart..unlike so many of the empty-headed talkers on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherish44 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
10. Manzullo is my Congressman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robeson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. She chewed him up and spit him out.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. it was a good exchange -- and rachel is wonderful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 09:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Hello. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pisces (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
16. Agreed!! THat's why the Repubs say no to her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarjorieG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
17. If GOP now saying wants job ceation, infrastructure, we get it in the Senate, we-they get credit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SKKY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-28-09 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
18. Rachel's only obligation and allegiance appears to be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndrewJacksonFaction (471 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
21. Anybody found video of it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frosty1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Here you go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
22. I think it's great that no pubs want to go on her show! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Z_I_Peevey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
23. It's real journalism, something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
24. For some reason when I read that I my brain short-circuited and I thought you mean Rachael Ray |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
25. Her ratings are good be cause you can take her seriously, she's not sloppy like the rest of em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC