Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama order could trip up Rove

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:14 PM
Original message
Obama order could trip up Rove
Source: Raw Story

Obama order could present problems for Rove
John Byrne
Published: Tuesday January 27, 2009

A little-noticed twist in an order issued by President Barack Obama the day after his inauguration may present problems for former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove and other Bush Administration officials that have been targeted for their alleged role in various scandals.

Rove was subpoenaed Monday afternoon by House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI). When the dogged Democrat subpoenaed him last year, Bush Administration lawyers invoked "executive immunity" to prevent Rove from testifying.

This year, however, George W. Bush is no longer in the president's chair. Determination of executive privilege must now also be examined by President Obama's lawyers. In fact, Rove's lawyer made direct reference to Obama's role in any future decision to enjoin Rove's appearance on the congressional witness stand Monday night.

"It's generally agreed that former presidents retain executive privilege as to matters occurring during their term," Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, told The Washington Post. "We'll solicit the views of the new White House counsel and, if there is a disagreement, assume that the matter will be resolved among the courts, the president and the former president."

Read more: http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Obama_order_could_present_problems_for_0127.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope I get to see my personal fantasy fulfilled...
Which is to see that no good son of a bitch Rove frog marched out of wherever he's holed up in handcuffs by law enforcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud progressive Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. i hope you are young. you will have lots of time to fantasize before this gets resolved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. So Obama was also making investigation and prosecution of Bush crimes easier
for Congress or anyone else who starts looking. Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Perhaps Rove can share a cell with John's wife.
Monica is facing some time herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush and his cronies
Left so many ends open and in order to get things done we have to investigate. Had Bush handled it when it happened this would be over. Lumpy should have testified long ago. He could have lied and Cheney would see to it that it somehow becomes the truth. But now it's out of their hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rove's Not Gonna Show Up - This Will Be A Matter For The Courts.......
he's going to push it as far down the road as possible. Just look at what Norm Coleman is doing to Franken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. A question of DU's lawyers and lawyer wannabees...
It's generally agreed...

Does this have any legal ramification, or does it refer to a "gentleman's agreement?"

It seems to me when it comes to the law, nothing is "generally agreed." Even when it's in black and white, there's room for debate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh dear. Obama has lifted their fog of subterfuge and bullshit.
Go get him, Conyers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC