Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Stimulus Package Is Leaning To Scientific Research & Not Shovel Ready Projects?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:23 PM
Original message
The Stimulus Package Is Leaning To Scientific Research & Not Shovel Ready Projects?
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 10:27 PM by cryingshame
that is the discussion as I heard it on the radio today. But surveying news links from today most discussion seems to say the opposite (more money to shovel ready projects).

Time will tell. But I am kind of sick of reading DU'ers saying how they are unhappy with the stimulus package but have no actual idea where the money is going.

Looking for stories to back this up on Google I found some older articles and will keep looking. I'd love to see any more current info that let's us know what the money will be going toward.

Obama's 2009 stimulus package to grant $16 billion in R&D funding
by Marisa Olivia | January 18, 2009 at 03:38 pm

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) has estimated that, of the $850 billion economic stimulus package drafted by the incoming Congress and Obama administration, nearly two percent will go to research and development in the sciences.

Of the almost $16 billion appropriated to R&D:

$9.9 billion will go toward the conduct of research and development (mainly basic research)
$3.4 billion will fund R&D facilities and large research equipment
$2.5 billion will go toward non-R&D, but science- and technology-related, funding

Among the organizations receiving the most funding are the National Institute of Health ($3.6 billion), National Science Foundation ($3 billion), the Department of Energy's Office of Science ($2 billion), and the Department of Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology ($520 million).

It will be interesting to see how science and technology R&D is truly expected to aid (or not) economic recovery. The allocations would suggest that it will be the construction itself that is expected to do so. By comparison, according to the Washington Post, nearly 40 percent of the stimulus package will go towards health care and education.

.........................................................

The Science Coalition applauds House economic stimulus package proposal
Statement from Bill Andresen, president, the Science Coalition

Bill Andresen, President of the Science Coalition (TSC) issued the following statement today in response to the House Appropriations Committee economic stimulus package proposal:

"The Science Coalition applauds the House for recognizing the vital need to include research funding in the economic stimulus and recovery efforts. Funding for targeted federal research programs will have the immediate impact of creating jobs and stimulating economic activity in communities across the country. This is an example that we hope the Senate will eventually follow.

"Specifically, we applaud President-elect Obama, Speaker Pelosi (D-CA) and Representative Obey (D-WI) for their leadership in supporting scientific research funding. Basic research, which is conducted at universities across the country, is an investment that drives our economy and helps us compete in the global marketplace. Today's release of the House economic stimulus package proposal demonstrates that policymakers understand funding for scientific research is an investment, not an expense."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, we do need R&D. It is vital... We also need a modern transportation
system, modern sewer and water systems, modern electric grids, and modern access to the internet. Most of the systems that are in place were once put there back in the day, and now are just duck taped together. It is imperative that we become modernized in these areas. R&D goes hand in hand in many of these intances in considerations with water systems, bridges, highspeed rail, impact studies, and electric modernizations to get us off of our carbon dependency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think this is a summary of it
haven't read it yet, and don't know if it's changed since then

http://appropriations.house.gov/pdf/PressSummary01-15-09.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC