|
Reagan kicked off his campaign by praising the murders of three civil rights workers in Philadelphia, Mississippi. He sold weapons to nations that had declared war on us and diverted those weapons to terrorist groups in Central America who were raping and killing American nuns. He created the largest defecit in human history to that time, and drove more people below the poverty line than even Bush. He used race and gender as weapons to divide the nation to keep his voting faction in control. He bombed Lebanon and Libya, and provoked a war between Iraq and Iran that cost millions of lives. He sold weapons to both sides of that war, keeping the slaughter going long after both would have exhausted their resources for war otherwise. I had a lot of friends from the Middle East and Europe and even South Africa in the late 80s and 90s, and I don't agree that Reagan was less hated than Bush or Cheney. Genesis, The Police, and Don Henley wrote songs criticizing him, and all were big hits.
I just don't agree that Bush was worse. Reagan had a better PR department, and over time his fan base has organized to clean up his record. When people publish, report, or direct unfavorable stories about Reagan, these organizations launch PR offensives to have the stories killed or altered, so that most of what we've seen has been favorable.
What worries me is that Bush will have the same effort made on his behalf, and in 20 years people will be claiming he wasn't as bad. If people remembered or understood Reagan's administration better, they'd understand Clinton's better, and we wouldn't have gotten in the mess with W in the first place. Same with Bush--Obama will not look as good in twenty years if people forget exactly how bad Bush was.
|