Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP acknowledges that Roberts flubbed the oath.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:12 PM
Original message
AP acknowledges that Roberts flubbed the oath.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090120/ap_on_go_pr_wh/inauguration_chief_justice

WASHINGTON – Chief Justice John Roberts swore in President-elect Barack Obama as president of the United States on Tuesday with a slight stumble over the wording of the oath of office in the first of what could be many important interactions between two men who rose to their positions of power quickly and who have some background similarities, but whose politics differ.

Separated by a Bible used by Abraham Lincoln at his first inaugural, Roberts asked Obama: "Are you prepared to take the oath, Senator?"

The former Illinois senator indicated he was, and Roberts started reciting — and Obama repeating — the 35-word oath that is prescribed by the Constitution.

But at one point, Obama paused abruptly after Roberts reversed several words in the oath.

The oath includes the phrase "that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States" but Roberts didn't say "faithfully" until after saying "president of the United States."

Obama apparently realized that something was out of order.

With Obama not reciting, Roberts then repeated the phrase correctly, the brief awkward moment ended and Obama was back on track.

He was then the first to congratulate Obama on his new job.

The inaugural oath is the chief justice's sole responsibility on Jan. 20 — although it is a traditional role, not one set forth in the Constitution. But the affable Roberts and his conservative-leaning Supreme Court could have much to say in the years to come about Obama's most important policy choices.

Former President George W. Bush left the court with two relatively young and reliably conservative voices, those of Roberts, 53, and Justice Samuel Alito, 58. Roberts took his seat in 2005 and Alito joined him the next year.

Roberts is the youngest chief justice in more than 200 years. He easily could still be in his role a quarter century from now, long after Obama has left office.

He and Obama are similar in many ways. Both are late baby boomers. Roberts is 53, Obama 47. And both got their law degrees from Harvard and made rapid ascents to power. But their politics diverge sharply.

Roberts was an official in Republican administrations before becoming an appeals court judge and then chief justice under Bush.

Obama was one of 22 Senate Democrats to vote against Roberts' confirmation to the Supreme Court in 2005 — the first time a Supreme Court justice has sworn in a president who voted against him.

As president, Obama will try to use Supreme Court vacancies to counter Roberts' influence, either by replacing aging liberals with justices as young as or younger than Roberts or by changing the court's balance if a conservative justice retires unexpectedly.

Obama added the words "so help me God" to the end of the constitutional oath, following a practice established by George Washington and followed by most presidents.

The last time a chief justice swore in a president of a different party was in 1997, when Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, a Republican, swore in Democrat Bill Clinton for a second term. Two years later, Rehnquist would preside over Clinton's impeachment trial in the Senate which resulted in an acquittal.

Obama didn't actually finish taking the oath until 12:05 p.m., five minutes after he actually became president under the Constitution. Clinton, in his first inauguration in 2001, also was five minutes late in taking the oath.

The Lincoln Bible used by Obama was on loan from the Library of Congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Roberts sounded a little drunk to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. It was probably the Prozac that all the Republicans are using these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not defending his policies or politics, but I wonder if roberts was just nervous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. yeah, I agree.
he seemed to be trying to recite from "memory" which obviously didn't work. The irony is hilarious though. The justice that Obama voted against flubbed and Obama held strong. Awesome day:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Nay, I disagree.
He was doing his part to tarnish a great part of history. What a schmuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good. Roberts behavior was shameful. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It sure was
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. And he's probably on heavy-duty anti-seizure meds
but note that Pres. Obama figured out he was wrong and made him repeat the line. LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Looks & sounds like sabotage to me.
Roberts is an asshole. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Chief Fuck justice up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hey, John... It's in the Constitution. You might want to read it once in a while.
Edited on Tue Jan-20-09 01:33 PM by Patsy Stone
You dork. A historical fuck up for the ages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwei924 Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. What a dumbass. It's not that hard to remember a few lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nobody can ever call my President dumb...he knew right away
that something was wrong and said the words the correct way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yep..."That One" is always a few steps ahead of the curve
Well-played, PRESIDENT Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Roberts an idiot
He's just a stupid fuck. Just like Thomas, Scalia and Alito. These people aren't brilliant legal scholars. They are below average lawyers who got their jobs by being ass kissing federalist society toadies. STUPID CORRUPT FUCKS.

And today, the brilliant constitutional law professor simply highlighted the fact that Roberts is truly unqualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. I dislike Roberts but I think it was nerves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. It wasn't deliberate. It was easy for him to forget "faithfully" after the last eight years. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC