Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone catch Chris Matthews tonight pointing out Palin's using "Democrat party"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:54 PM
Original message
Did anyone catch Chris Matthews tonight pointing out Palin's using "Democrat party"?
Edited on Thu Jan-08-09 06:55 PM by jenmito
He did it once months ago, when the cross-eyed Ron Christie talked about the "Democrat party," Matthews said to him, "Why do you call it the 'Democrat party'? You know the correct term is the 'Democratic party,'" and Christie apologized.

Tonight he played a few clips of Sarah Palin, one where she claimed she would've been treated better if she was a member of the "Democrat party" and Matthews commented, paraphrasing, "By the way, it's called the Democratic party, not the Democrat party." And later when he played the clip again for Michelle Bernard, he asked her what it IS with people calling it the "Democrat party," asking why they can't use the correct term, the adjective, and her answer was, paraphrasing, "I guess it's like the 'nucular' thing." :eyes: I'm just glad SOMEONE pointed it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. yeah, I was glad to hear Matthews call out Palin and ilk on this
I remember him saying, "Why can't they give them (the Democrats) the adjective?" Good for him. And Michelle Bernard for her answer, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yup...
he's the only person I EVER heard even MENTION the correct form of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
45. People use that term because it is one of the demoning terms that
Newt Gingrich gave out through GOPac. It is to demean and derogate, the fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Yeah . . .
It's a just one little right-wing dog whistle that I find aggravating. Not so much that the creeps themselves use it to show which side they are on. I'm cool with that. It's that no one in the media ever calls them on it or says, "So how do you feel about the Republic Party?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. First time I had heard someone call them out on that. Good! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's about time, but tweety never called them out all the time the
bastards were trashing Clinton about the Lewinsky scandal on his show all those years back to the present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. And he felt no need to call himself out when in 2000 he was the prime echo chamber for the RW smears
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. I nominate him for a Russert Prize for Journalistic Bravery.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. So he gets no credit for saying what he said? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I really think Tweety does those symbolic things
so progressives can somehow think he is on our side. After belittling Gore for not knowing who he is and Kerry for being "french" and Dean for screaming and Barack for not being "ethnic" enough, he lobs a bone like correcting someone for saying Democrat party. Its pretty meaningless coming from Tweety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I disagree...
He is definitely on "the left" when it comes to being lied into war, the leaking of Plame's name, torture, and other things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Those issues are mainstream positions now
He would have to be less than human to take up a position supporting torture. His sexism regarding Hillary was unsurpassed. The asshole voted for Bush in 2000, and Steele in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Not to Repubs...
Edited on Thu Jan-08-09 08:10 PM by jenmito
which many people claim he is. I believe he's more of a Dem. or an Independent. And he was all OVER the Scooter Libby case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Was he "on the left" when he pulled the lever for Bush, as he admitted on his show 5/27/05??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. No. But now, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. We'll see how much you want to stand beside that now that he's resigned with MSNBC. Bookmarked! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. He has not resigned from MSNBC. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. I noticed that as soon as I did it and should have clarified, meant re-signed as in a contract, not
resigned as in leaving.

Gotta go check the dictionary on that one, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. OK then. I'm sure he'll remain the person he is now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. i don't think he does it for political reasons
he does it because it leaves his guests stammering. it is a legitimate point to make and perhaps it is an annoyance to him that word games are being played to manipulate the audience. but if you wonder why he points this out and you think it may be self serving, then think how it makes him look to his audience: sharp, quick and not letting the audience get played. Also, it's worth noting that his audience, along with MSNBC's has gotten more liberal, as the country has, but also as Olbermann and Maddow's viewers (hopefully) watch him. thus, he is catering to the new audience.

remember also that whatever these hosts do, they have producers and managers advising them and researching what their ratings are and what their audiences want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. No. He's got a lot of debits to work off before he gets credits.
He was sooo horrid in the lead-up to & early days of the invasion & occupation of Iraq.

He said, "We're all neocons now". Hard to forgive.

He had a man-crush on Bush. It was gross.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. It was more than a man crush....he voted for the Shrub! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Oh yeah, now how brave is it? Uh huh...now that there's a Democratic president who has an
unquestioned mandate.

You idiot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm starting think that woman is not very bright. :-) NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because in some sort of malapropistic manner, they intend to
demean and diminish the democratic party/ideology by altering the proper verbiage... shame on her for plying such pithy means to achieve quite literally nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I know. And I'm glad at least ONE person in the media pointed that out. Even the
Dem. "strategists" never call out their Repub. counter-parts when they use the same slur right in front of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
32. I recall some right-winger (at this point I can't remember if it was McCarthy
or Delay or another Repug "luminary") explaining that the "Democrat Party" thing was due to trying to make the point that the Democratic Party is not "democratic." (As if the Repugs are??) They've been making this grammatical "mistake" for decades, but it seems as if it really heated up during the Gingrich years, when the right-wing fringe became the mainstream of the Repug Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackeens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is Chris Matthews a pundint? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Apparently so according to a quick google search. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bush used it in the State of the Union speech.
When pointed out he did one of his 'ahh shucks! I didn't know'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I know. He claimed it was a
"slip of the tongue." :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. Rec'd~ How nice of him to do that..enough
of that and repubs will get the idea that it just makes them look stoopid.:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Thank you...
for the back-up. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Now some feel the need to "back up" Tweety...... who else?
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 01:09 AM by rvablue
Why don't we start a whole thread defending all of the people who voted for and touted the Shrub who now feel stupid about it.

OH! I know....why don't you start with Richard Perle who today stated he had nothing to do with the Iraq War!?!?!

If you are still sweet on Tweety...take a walk over to Media Matters and do a search on the 2000 election....it's a huge eye-opener.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I think you need a refresher course in comprehension. n/t
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 12:40 PM by jenmito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. I guess it's time for us to start calling them "Republics," or preferably, "Repukes"
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 12:38 PM by high density
The Republic Party. The Repuke Party. Has a great ring to it.

I think this whole Democrat Party thing was brought on by right-wing talk radio, and it's been magnified from our executive branch ever since Bushco took office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Yeah
Although I've heard the "Democrat Party" thing dates back to the mid-twentieth century, it seems that it really mainstreamed in the mid-nineties. According to this article, the Repugs made it part of their platform in '96, at the height of the "Republican Revolution," but have apparently decided to call us our proper name now "at least in writing."

Republicans: "Democrat Party" No More
by Calvin Woodward

>>>>WASHINGTON — Republicans have come up with another name for the opposing party _ the right name. For years now, the GOP has gone after "Democrat schemes," "Democrat presidents," "Democrat Congresses" _ all phrases from the 1996 Republican platform, repeated many times since. Twenty years earlier, Bob Dole famously declared that all wars of the 20th century were "Democrat wars."

On Tuesday, members of the Republican platform committee meeting in Minneapolis voted down a proposal to call the opposition the "Democrat Party" in the 2008 platform. Instead, they'll go with the proper Democratic Party.

"We probably should use what the actual name is," said Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, the panel's chairman. "At least in writing."

In 1996, references to the Democratic Party were purged from a draft of the platform. As party leaders explained at the time, they wanted to make the subtle point that the Democratic Party had become elitist, no longer small-d democratic.>>>>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/27/republicans-democrat-part_n_121760.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. "We probably should use what the actual name is," said Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, the panel's
chairman. "At least in writing."

Thanks for the article. These Repubs. need to be called on it every time they use "Democrat" as an adjective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
47. Call 'em "Repubes"
...and if they object to the similarity to "pubic", pretend to apologise.

It's what they do with the similarity to "rat", which is where all this crap started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. thank you Chris Matthews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
36. At least Tweety makes fools of the Rethugs on occasion
Its more than I can hope for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Yes, he does...
I really believe he just love politics and says what he believes, some of which we like, some of which we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Tweety is an overexcited nutball but I like him
He talks without thinking sometimes but I don't take him seriously. He is better then a lot of what is out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. I agree...
He seems to speak faster than his mind can think at times. But I think he says what he believes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
40. It is NOT like "nucular." Conservatives say it by design
Republican pollster Frank Lutz determined that the term "democratic" has a good connotation with the American public. While "Democrat Party" had been used in the past, Newt Gingrich really pushed it into the conservative talking points so that America would not feel good about the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. It sure isn't...
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 02:02 PM by jenmito
but Michelle Bernard calls herself "right of center." Apples and oranges, "nucular" and "Democrat party."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
44. "Chris Matthews believes his job is to make Obama's presidency successful"
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 02:51 PM by jenmito
http://www.jossip.com/journalist-chris-matthews-will-do-everything-in-his-power-to-make-obamas-presidency-successful-20081106/

This is from a RW site complaining about how Matthews is so "in the tank" for Obama. It's a transcript and video of him in support of Obama while talking to Joe Scarborough on Morning Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
46. Sure did!
He comes through on the right side every so often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
49. I like the Tweety of the last 2-3 years, but...
the Tweety from 1998-2005 was horrific. He piled on Clinton, had an insane man-crush on Bush such that he lost any value as a member of the media charged with trying to keep politicians honest.

As much as you can sense anything like this from watching a pundit on tv, I think he realizes the mistakes he made and is trying to make up for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
50. I think Michelle was joking - to me, she seemed to be in complete
agreement with Chris.

And yes, I'm always glad when that silliness is pointed out.

But I'd be even more glad if I never had to see Palin's face or hear her voice again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peaches2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
51. However, other than calling her down on 'Democratic'
Chris was positively having an orgasm about everything else he said about her. Everything else was positive, she's terrific, she's so natural, etc. You could see him undressing her with everything else he said about her. He does that quite often with women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. that was weird
because Chris Matthews showed the exact same clips of Palin yesterday, and had a negative view on it. Today, he was going on and on about how she was such a "natural", tried to say that her "approval ratings were at 80%" and that "She knows exactly what she is doing, she keeps up with reading"etc. The other guests were not buying his bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC