Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Kennedy missteps might not trip her up in the end

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 07:25 PM
Original message
AP: Kennedy missteps might not trip her up in the end
By MICHAEL GORMLEY – 51 minutes ago

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Caroline Kennedy's missteps and halting speech patterns have been replayed endlessly since she announced her bid to succeed Hillary Rodham Clinton in the U.S. Senate. News articles nationwide, editorials and endless political blogs called her not ready for prime time, a valley girl for her diction, and worst of all for a Democrat of perfect pedigree, the next Sarah Palin, the Republican vice presidential nominee who was criticized for displaying flash but little substance.

The print stories, TV news clips and blogs that counted Kennedy's use of "you know" and "um" during a series of interviews the weekend after Christmas took a toll even among a public where those speech patterns are common.

None of it may matter. That's because she's playing to just one voter — the Democratic governor with the power of appointment — who has plenty of reasons to pick President John F. Kennedy's daughter.

{snip}

Today's public opinion of Kennedy "strikes me as monumentally irrelevant," said Gerald Benjamin, professor of politics at the State University of New York at New Paltz. Benjamin said that until a few weeks ago, Kennedy was the little girl filmed playing in JFK's Oval Office.

"So a decline in her public reputation isn't measuring anything," he said. "And surely if she were to become the U.S. senator and had two years to perform in a highly visible position, these measures at this juncture would become inconsequential."

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j1Ip3ozUR59_dUPZBfwDdRBUpbRgD95H9HL80
.........................

Wait til they find out she drinks French wine!!!!1111!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ron Fournier.
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You got me.
Any hints? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. AP's DC bureau chief.
Republican.

Does it mean every AP headline is suspect? No.
Does it mean every AP headline is suspect? Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ron Fournier is a bushit toadie and
is the head of AP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ah. No it's not the most flattering headline is it.
But you know what? I've been scanning Google headlines more or less daily and they're just about all crappy. It looks to me like the AP is trying to break it to us gently that Caroline is going to get it, that is if Clinton gets the SOS job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. And as for those "PPP" polls...
I think I'd put more trust in Enron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's why I've been saying..
with all this speculation that we'll see when we see. Not that it isn't fun to read stuff along the way.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yep there's only one voter who matters in this one
and if I'm not mistaken he's already voted. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. We're gonna see what
fate has in store for Caroline and for the Senatorial seat in New York.

At least our Gov is above board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. "So a decline in her public reputation isn't measuring anything"
Well, it does measure what the corporate media would like us to think people are thinking about someone they're doing their damndest to swiftboat into oblivion.

Now I wonder why they're shitting their pants about Caroline if she's as clueless as they claim? Don't forget these are the same guys who tried to sell us on America's new sweetheart Sarah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kennedy is not fit for that office. I used to back her
but she has not proven she even has the slightest idea of what she wants to do for New Yorkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. What exactly would you like her to do for New Yorkers?
Vote up another Wall Street bailout like Nadler? Or another war like Maloney? Or just not upset the New York Times?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC