|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:45 PM Original message |
"We look forward to working with President-Elect Obama and our DEMOCRAT colleagues..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. I want to punch him in his face so hard. His voice drives me nuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Whitey Corngood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yeah, but he's got a really cool tan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Me, too. His voice and the way he always licks his lips like he needs another cigarette. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. He's a fucking jerk. Droopy eyed jerk n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I hate him. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. They started saying that back in the 1970s and they do it because they know it bugs us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I know. But they shouldn't be allowed-it's not proper etiquette. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. They're getting away with torture, murder, illegal invasions, ripping the constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TygrBright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 05:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. No, they started it back in the 1950s. It was a Roy Cohn brainstorm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 06:05 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Actually goes back to Thomas Dewey, RFK's pal, Cohn, picked up on it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 09:35 PM Response to Reply #22 |
41. I didn't know that. Figures. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. I, too, thought it was a 70s creation of Lance Tarrance, but ends up, it goes ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
7. At least he didn't ask if people wanted the friggin' undercoating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I know. What a creep. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
9. They do that shit on purpose. Send him to AA. Maybe he'll learn how to speak then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I know. They shouldn't be allowed IMO. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. As long as forced to address President Barack Obama, Senator Al Franken, Vice-President Joe Biden... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
14. The "Democrat" party should do like the Repukes did (to themselves); |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 07:21 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. That's what I'm talkin' about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 07:05 AM Response to Reply #28 |
45. doubtful ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
90-percent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
15. a KO special comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 07:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. I remember that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
16. And I look forward to the savoring the GOP's impotence and irrelevancy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'm a liberal progressive leftist Democrat...it's not a bad word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. It's bad grammar and incorrect. It's 'DemocratIC colleagues." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 07:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. Yes, but you're a member of the Democratic party. Proper grammar-it's an adjective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 07:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Exactly ...I'm a Democrat in the Democratic Party...the guy said Democrat colleagues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 10:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. They're Democratic colleagues. It's an adjective. They KNOW they should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Writer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
18. The fact that this bothers so many Democrats enables the GOP to continue using this as an epithet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 07:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
32. It is sad, but it is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
19. It just looks bad on him...we own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 07:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. I still don't like it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
21. He's got to stop that SHIT. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
24. Any worthwhile reporter would correct Republicans when they say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 07:35 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. I remember Chris Matthews did it once-to Ron Christie-and Christie apologized. But he never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 08:06 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Hmm, wonder who told Chris to stop it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
25. Here's a bit of interesting repuke history on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 07:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Thanks for that - really interesting! Those people are SICK CREEPS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 07:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. You are very welcome. The repukes are morally and ideologically bankrupt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 08:05 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. LOL - They're probably choking on those particular two words! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 07:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Thanks for that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
90-percent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
47. Luntz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
38. Is "Democrat" for "Repugnant" a fair trade? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Or "RepubliCON." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tledford (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
39. The Democrats in Congress should begin to reference "the Republic Party." eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crimsonblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
40. and I speak on behalf of all democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-09 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
44. Bean-head needs a shoe thrown at him. In case you missed KO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 09:20 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Yes-I saw his show last night... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-07-09 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
49. I'm glad they do it because it's a dead giveaway that they're not serious about bipartisanship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC