MN Supreme Court Rejects Coleman's request...

[S_E_Fudd]

Rejected Absentees will not be reconsidered...

http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/37093114.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUac8HEaDiaMDCinchO7DU


More good news for Al

[camera obscura]

1. Hell yeah!

:toast:

[Thrill]

2. Give it up Norm. Its over

[democrattotheend]

3. So does Coleman have any other options?

Or does he have no choice but to concede now?

[Bjorn Against]

4. He doesn't have any credible options

That doesn't mean he won't push some frivolous lawsuits though.

[Torgo Johnson]

6. Norm is going to file so many frivolous lawsuits....

it will make Phillip J. Berg blush.

[rhett o rick]

10. He hasn't used up his "holding his breath" option. nm

[Cha]

5. Curious as to why

the Minnesota Court turned down the appeal on the rejected absentee ballots from repuke leaning areas?

They must have been really not in the lawful parameters?

Remember in 2000 when lieman wanted to take the absentee ballots from the military that were sent in after the date required?

[Bjorn Against]

7. They were all rejected for legal reasons.

If the Supreme Court were to accept the counting of ballots that were legally rejected it would open a huge can of worms and the Franken campaign would inevitibly be back with a new list of ballots they wanted to be counted. There is no way they could justify counting legally rejected ballots but only doing so in Republican counties like Coleman is suggesting.

Coleman knew from the beginning this lawsuit had no chance, he is just trying to make people think that there are votes that should have been counted but weren't so that people will doubt the election results.

[Cha]

9. Thanks..Of course coleman and

his gang of obfuscators are up to their usual filthy tricks.

Fortunately, somehow Franken was able to get some more votes. I wasn't following it closely.

[Jennicut]

8. All right! Does this mean Al is Senator yet?