Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry Reid will push for impeachment of President Bush.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:20 PM
Original message
Harry Reid will push for impeachment of President Bush.
Oh wait, I meant he won't seat Roland Burris.

http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2008/12/blagojevich-to-name-burris-to-senate.html

If only he was as forceful in his attempts to not seat Burris as he was in his attempts to push forward impeachment hearings on President Bush.

Harry Reid is a worthless POS. I am so sick and tired of spineless Dems like him. He needs to be primaried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Impeachment begins in the House, and
the person launching it would have been John Conyers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Details, details.
:think:



:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Harry Reid had a bully pulpit shortly after the 2006 midterms to push forward the impeachment agenda
Edited on Tue Dec-30-08 07:27 PM by EconomicLiberal
I am aware of the procedures necessary to start impeachment. That is not the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Senators do not go around advocating impeachment.
Even when Feingold wanted to censure, he made it clear he was not talking about impeachment. It's a call for the House.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Joe Lieberman pretty much advocated impeachment in 1998.
Even though he didn't say it directly.

You are wrong here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. "Even though he didn't say it directly."
Joe Lieberman we now know is an ass.

So no, I'm not wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Gee I wonder why I get emails from Feingold recommending impeachment
Been on his email list for a couple years now. Wow. Do you suppose someone is impersonating Feingold?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'm on his e-mail list too.

The Question of Impeachment

By U.S. Senator Russ Feingold

Daily Kos
July 16, 2007

Last week I came here to discuss how I plan to tighten my legislation to end the open-ended military mission in Iraq so the Administration would not be able to exploit it and keep tens of thousands of troops, if not more, stuck in the middle of an Iraqi civil war. I appreciated all of the responses and of course I noticed that many of you advocated for the impeachment of the President as well as the Vice President and the Attorney General. I’ve been hearing some of those same comments in Wisconsin.

It is clear that there are many people in this country, including myself, who demand accountability from this Administration for the terrible mess it made in Iraq and its egregious and even illegal power grabs throughout its six-plus years in power. I believe that the President and Vice President may well have committed impeachable offenses. But with so many important issues facing this country and so much work to be done, I am concerned about the great deal of time multiple impeachment trials would take away from the Congress working on the problems of the country. The time it would take for the House to consider articles of impeachment, and for the Senate to conduct multiple trials, would make it very difficult, if not impossible, for Congress to do what it was elected to do – end the war and address some of the other terrible mistakes this Administration has made over the past six and a half years.

While some have pointed to Republicans’ decision to impeach President Clinton, I am also concerned about the over-use of impeachment. And I am conscious of the fact that I would have a specific role to play as a sworn, impartial juror should an impeachment be tried in the Senate. If charges come to the Senate, I will approach them and the trial with the same seriousness that I had when I participated in the Clinton impeachment trial. I would not prejudge the case one way or the other should it come to this.

I fully respect the anger and frustration many Americans feel with this Administration. I share much of it. But on balance, I think Congress’s time is much better spent ending the war in Iraq, conducting the oversight that was absent for the last six years, and advancing progressive legislation.

UPDATE: I know that many of you disagree with my approach to this issue, but I thought it was important to make it clear where I’m coming from and explain why I am not calling for impeachment.

I certainly do believe in holding this Administration accountable and upholding the Constitution and the rule of law. That’s why last year I called for the President to be censured for his authorization of the illegal wiretapping program. I thought that was the appropriate course because it would have put the Senate on record in condemning the President’s wrongdoing. I still think that the censure resolution played an important role in focusing the public and the media’s attention on the issue. And I am working to make sure that Congress finally exercises its oversight responsibility by holding hearings and demanding information about the wiretapping program, the U.S. attorney firings and other abuses of power.

Many of you also wrote that if I recognize that the President and Vice President may have committed impeachable offenses, than it is our responsibility to impeach. As I pointed out, it is the role of the House to impeach, and it is the role of the Senate to try impeachments. But the Constitution left it up to the judgment of members of Congress whether or not moving forward with impeachment is best for the country.

Please keep the comments coming. I’ll do my best to read them all. I very much appreciate your honesty and directness. This exchange is very important to me.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That link is from 18 months ago, Dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. So? It's his opinion. If you want to post his statement advocating impeachment,
go for it.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes, but at least Reid can advocate for impeachment and then vote to convict once it gets to the...
Senate. I would really like to see him get a serious challenge in the 2010 Dem primary here in Nevada, but I admit it's a real long shot. I do think though that Jack Carter could give Reid a run for his money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. True. Which means that
John Conyers joins Harry Reid on the "worthless POS" list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. give em hell harry. what a fing joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Economic liberal" -- that means you support universal health care and trade unions, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes. What's your point? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I wasn't sure if you were one of those "classical" economic "liberals" who follow Milton Friedman
Most of the "every man for himself!" laissez-faire stooges like to call themselves "economic liberals".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Do I have a neo in front of my name?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It's all cool.
Never mind me. False flag on my part.
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC