Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obamaz Warren Pickle.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:39 AM
Original message
Obamaz Warren Pickle.
The selection of two ministers to participate in his inauguration ceremony placed Obama in a difficult position. Having promised a new politics of inclusion during the election, a choice of two left leaning individuals would have opened him up to a charge of breaking his promise in pandering to his base. The right would be pressing related memez for the next four years. Choosing any right leaning individual guarantees someone antithetical to his base as their bound to be against abortion, women & GLBT rights.

This right leaning minister tacitly represents the attitudes of millions of Americans who belong to a religious vein that has condoned slavery and racial repression in the past, but Obama has been explicit in his desire to represent all Americans. Certainly many are completely intractable, however there has been leftward motion in the last few years as evidenced by the latest Newsweek article, new r/w environmental efforts, Obama turnout increase among those of faith and progressive-ish initiatives like those of Warren. Ignoring this constituency is effectively surrendering the ignorant to the traditional currents of bigotry.

Inclusion of a r/w minister gives more moral weight to our and Obamaz condemnations of their deplorable positions and forces a divide in the right between those in favor of exclusion and those of tolerance. Ultimately his inclusion will do no more damage to our causes than Clintonz inclusion of Billy Graham in his inauguration. Movements by neither Gandhi nor MLK were successful by ignoring the bigots, rather by advantageous confrontation. Warrenz selection has enabled us to perform and sharpen priceless attacks on these r/w positions in the MSM and the net which can continue thru the inauguration. A mere coupla points of change in the attitudes of this constituency would have defeated Prop 8 to begin with. Ostracizing and labeling them bigots is not to our advantage.

For these reasons among others I support Obamaz inclusion of Warrenz few moments of generic Christian prayer for our PE and nation in the inauguration. My only issues are that attacks on Obama for this choice and Warren personally are counterproductive to our movement and diminish our message.

Std disclaimer: I'm all for GLBT marriage. Warrenz a deplorable asshole. Also I apologize for any offense while pressing my case on the boards. YMMV. Sorry to kinda ramble and post & run, but a robust zed harvest is impending. BBL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, this has done one thing
Before this, I had no idea what a hateful, ugly person Warren is. I think this is shining the light of day on the ugly bullshit he is spreading.

I still wish Obama would not have him involved in the inauguration.

But in the same way Obama running for president broke barriers, this will move us toward equality for all. It is causing people to think. And talk. It's time for everyone. And those of us dedicated to human rights and justice for all WILL NOT REST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Soundz like a plan to me.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. What makes you think Warren will give a non-denomination prayer?
I'll bet you he will invoke Jesus and will refer to GAWD as a male deity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scackmgackm Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. This is why religion belongs in the closet
Pun intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. How do you get "non-denomination" from "generic Christian"?
Edited on Mon Dec-22-08 12:17 PM by yowzayowzayowza
:shrug:

Hez indeed likely to "invoke Jesus and will refer to GAWD as a male deity" as Christians frequently do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Religionists of all stripes
refer to God as a male deity. In fact just addressing deity as God does so, as our language is gendered for anyone granted recognition as person.

_I_ think this is a dilemma, but few others seem too upset about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Generic Christian prayer?
Edited on Mon Dec-22-08 11:34 AM by Upton
Just the site of Warren alters the invocation to homophobic propaganda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. No more so than the inclusion of Billy Graham did...
in Clintonz inauguration.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. UMMMMMMMMM
HOWEVER this is the SECOND incident with Obama. Remember Donnie McClurken?????
I'm beginning too see a very real pattern and it ain't pretty!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Obama is a "fierce defender" of McClurken's "cure" from homosexuality
Obama doesn't like "girlie" dogs either!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC