Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let us know if you have always been a Obama supporter and still are but think...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:15 AM
Original message
Let us know if you have always been a Obama supporter and still are but think...
that this decision on Warren is just plain wrong.

I do. I think overall PE Obama has been forming a great government but this symbolic decision to include a bigot like Warren in such a high profile role on Inaguration Day, a day which should bring all together, is just plain wrong and stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. yep. that's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. My favorite Kool-Aid Drinker -- or is that me???
I always forget.

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. *sigh*. I think we might need something a little stronger these days.
:hi: I never thought anything would happen that would make the primary fighting look tame. I cant stand to see everyone at each others throats like this. :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Someone just told me "patience is a virtue," and I should be happy to not fight for my rights
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #20
30. WHAT?!
It makes my blood boil to hear that kind of bullshit. Whats so damned hard for people to understand?! And what the hell kind of person defends discrimination?! :banghead: What. The. Fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. I am going home in a few minutes (it;'s wnowing liek HELL) and meditate
Then, I'm playing with the dogs in teh snow. Then I will try to stay off of here. But, as Kitchewitch says,"It's like crack!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. lol. I think I'll be hangin in the lounge more.
:toast: We're expecting a foot of snow here today - seems like a good time to drink. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
67. That is just so wrong!
The LGBT march for civil rights, has been a long, patient journey. The time has finally come for full inclusion. I worked for the Navy during the Reagan years and knew many gay and lesbian sailors, even served as a beard for one good friend. So, when Clinton enacted DADT, it seemed like a good incremental step in the right direction. It wasn't inclusive enough, but we have to take baby steps, eh?

Last week I saw "Milk" and how long the good people in SF and Cal. have been patiently working for inclusion. After the movie, my hubby and I speculated about Prop. 8, and how the vote would've gone if "Milk" had been released in Oct., instead of in late November.

Nope, the baby steps have already been taken. The movement has crawled, walked, and now it's ready to run. Patience has been the mode for decades, and, speaking for myself, it's starting to wear very thin.

:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. I am in this group
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. I got the first recommend in on this thread. Criticizing Obama is not disloyalty
It's a pretty shitty argument to say I'm hurting Obama's presidency by complaining about his selection of Warren. How can I hurt him when he isn't even president yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
6.  Although I'm not thrilled
about Warren I can see where Obama's coming from. During his entire campaign he said he wanted to reach out. In Grant Park he said he would be the President of those who didn't vote for him too. He says he wants to focus on what unites us and not what divides us. If we believe in Obama then we need to believe in what he's trying to do.... Unite us. He obviously doesn't hold a grudge and I'm going to try not too either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. You're a big person. Thank you very much for expressing your thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
48. Well if his plan was to unite us with this choice he failed miserably and caused enormous division
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #48
63. This is another thing bothering me -- I was hoping for someone who thinks in terms of complex
systems, and this move makes me think he views his role as playing on a grand chessboard, and that GBLT community are his pawn sacrifice.

A necessary part of building a coalition is not losing existing members.

I hope he not only realizes this is a mistaken move, but also looks at how he makes his decisions, exactly which game needs playing and which game needs abandoning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
75. Well said - me too!
I wish everyone could understand that - Obama's rising above the pettiness and bitterness and many here just want to drag him back down into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bingo.
But if there is no change, my support will diminish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. That's exactly the way I'm approaching it.
I oppose the Warren pick vehemently (while praising the Lowery pick at the same time), but if there is no change - and I count movement towards change as some things may take more than four years - then he will lose great amount of support I have for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. It is deadly wrong. So is overlooking excellent, brilliant Democrats to put mediocre right wingers
into his cabinet. Obama needs to start thinking of who put him in office and stop trying to be all things to all people, including to fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Not to excuse the inclusion of some truly bad picks
(Vilsack, Lahood), the appointments Solis, Chu, and Shinseki are very good, as are many of the non-Cabinet appointments he has made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. We've had fascists up to our noses for decades, and he finds it funny to be placing Repukes....
And not brilliant ones. As if there were no brilliant Democrats.

I'm really disappointed.

And he also said he'd have to hold off on his promise to increase the taxes of the mega-rich (who have been paying almost no taxes since Reagan - and this has been explained even by the mega-rich).

I'm really pissed off. I don't plan to watch the inauguration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. You're looking for reasons to be disappointed.
I've given a list of some of the picks he's made that are not facists, and not Republicans. You seem to have ignored that and them.

The promise was to let the tax cuts expire, if not repeal them outright. I don't know enough about economics to know if raising taxes on anyone during a recession is a good idea or not. As long as they are not made permanent, and I'm certain they won't be, the promise will be upheld.

It's you're right to be pissed off, but I find anger to be bad karma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #28
41. Actually, it's not only me. It's throngs of us, and we have been had
We won't be had in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #41
47. He's not the president yet.
And you have already written off the next four years. And from he post below, I think I understand why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. He's already put Republicans everywhere. Nothing more need be said nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. So everywhere is two spots in the cabinet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. LaHood is a horrible choice.
I am skeptical about Gates, but I strongly believe that Gates is just going to be a placeholder, implementing Obama's policies until Wesley Clark is eligible for the position.

Apparently, the Cabinet has been reduce to Defense and Transportation... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. Well didnt you hear? Warren has been named Secretary of Invocations...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. As I said, if I'd wanted more of the same, I'd have voted for more of the same
I'm going to watch. If this shit keeps up, 2012 will see me putting my money and campaigning time behind whichever Democrat runs against Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. You've been had because you don't listen
Obama said there would be Republicans in the cabinet. And You're shocked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. Then it's absolutely my mistake - did he also mention he'd have a homophobe speak at his inaug?
I must not have been listening very much, but I will in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
79. What's wrong with Vilsack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Too bad, Sarah. rethugs voted for Obama, too. You must have
missed the primaries when he said this is how he'd approach filling his cabinet. Your complaining won't change one thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Rethugs voted for rethugs, but apparently Obama thinks I'll be voting for him if he puts rethugs in
office to ingratiate himself to them.

2012 is now my target.

When are we finally going to have a real Democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. So don't vote for him; that's your right. But good luck finding what you
are looking for. And he is a real Democrat, with a much broader outlook on how to get things done than you apparently have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #23
40. The throngs that are currently pissed off could've put our weight behind Hillary Clinton
And if he keeps this up, we will put our weight behind her or another Democrat in 2012. This is insulting to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. Ah! You just outed yourself as to your motives. I should have known.
What makes you think Clinton wouldn't be doing exactly the same thing?

Did you forget all about the supposed big tent? Obviously so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Maybe she would've and maybe she wouldn't have. I don't know, but this one sure as hell is!
I've been had once again. I won't be in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #43
65. Ironic thing
I actually was a Clinton supporter but I'm willing to watch this chess game played out a few moves before sweeping the pieces off the board and stalking away in anger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Yes, I remember you were a big Clinton fan. I'm glad you're willing
to give the guy a chance to prove himself first. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yep. That's where I fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. I support and like Barack Obama
I do not worship him and will be celebrating on January 20th with everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. Nobody worships him.
Your generalizing is not necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Quite a few people on here seem to think that disagreeing with anything he does or says
is the most awful thing in the world...that my friend is worship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:32 AM
Original message
Couldn't have said it better
I really don't like it that he picked Warren. I like his decision about Sec. of Agriculture even less.

I still like him, but we'll see.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. Me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. That's me, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
17. Yup it was wrong
:kick: And a remain a strong supporter of Barack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. I disagree with it, but it's just a prayer, not a cabinet position--I can understand
being offended, but it doesn't portend anything policy-wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
22. I am in this group and it makes me sick.
It makes me so ill because I don't if I can trust him to always make the right decision. Prior to this I had no worries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. He's going to do some stupid things
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 10:53 AM by Jake3463
I knew that all along. He's human. If I was in his position I'd do some stupid things to. The thing is he'll hopefully do less stupid things than the other guys would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
25. Yep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
27. No, I was a Richardson supporter who voted reluctantly for Obama in the primary
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 10:53 AM by slackmaster
Without hesitation in the general election, and have warmed up to him since then after watching his performance in debates, interviews, speeches, etc.

I will trust his judgment and stand behind him until he does something that I believe is truly wrong. At that point I will be all over him "like ugly on a ape" as my beloved uncle used to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. I am going to steal that phrase.
It is win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. It's more polite than "flies on shit"
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
33. is this a pre primary hillary thread?
just kidding.
I understand his purpose and i support it. Im sure that ole rick warren speaks out against other religions, of which i am a member. I am not bothered nor to i feel that he is furthering my already present discrimination.

Its clear that he is trying to open the ears of social conservatives. Once their ears are open, then mind will listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
35. I'll chime in for that one.
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 11:17 AM by reflection
Not thrilled at all about the Warren choice.

My evangelical fundamental father, however, who wouldn't ever fathom voting for Obama, now thinks "he may not be all that bad."

So whether or not the intent of the Warren pick was to defuse the RW religious demographic and/or bring them into the fold, the pick may have had that effect on some. To me though, it's still not appropriate.

(edit for bad grammar)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #35
46. Interesting about your dad-maybe
that's been Obama's intent all along, though I still don't like this choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #46
53. It's hard to tell with Obama.
He plays his cards so close to his chest sometimes. He may be thinking as a political animal, or he may really be that tone-deaf with respect to the GLBT demographic. The luxury of being an average voter is that we can take principled positions without much consequence. Obama has to extrapolate every move into the future like any other politician.

Whatever his intent, I hope he reverses himself and picks a less divisive figure for this aspect of his inauguration. Sometimes you should do the right thing regardless of the consequences. This appears to be one of those times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #35
50. and finally someone sees the logic
inclusion is harder than people think. Now maybe your dad will be open to Obama's ideas.

Most people who are oppressed as a minority believe that inclusion means "the majority accepting them" but is actually means "both sides accepting one another."

Intellect has always been more like a horse race than a consensus. Someone usually gets there way before the rest.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #50
71. That is why the decision was made, I'm sure. And since ALL my family
are fundamentalists, I'll be happy if maybe their minds are opened at least a tiny bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. seems pretty clear to me
Its the fundies that need to listen. They wont unless they feel included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
37. Me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
38. Totally agree - Warren has said gay marriage is akin to incest, child rape and polygamy
And the man is going to ask God for Obama's future blessings? I have no respect for Rick Warren and feel he is part of the problem and not part of the solution for equal justice for all! This is VERY disappointing to me as I know it is to so many others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Yes, it is disappointing. I think a lot of people who bought his books
have no idea what he thinks about gays. He kind of hooked them in with a fairly positive book to start off with. Not positive about gays, mind you. He simply left those beliefs out so he could sell more books. I have no idea what his subsequent books say, but I'm wondering if he sort of gradually exposed his beliefs in them, or if he continued to ignore the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Hey Jenn, I never knew his views about gays until just a few days ago.
He really sells a very untrue version of himself to some people out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #44
64. Yes, he does. Imagine if he had spouted those ideas on Oprah.
His beliefs have been pretty well hidden from the general public. He seems so "nice" and "wholesome" doesn't he? Until you dig further. Problem is, most people don't dig further. For one, they don't have the time or even a real interest in it. They bought a book that everybody raved about and said was inspirational. So they think he's great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cogito ergo doleo Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
51. Yes... but...
I understand where he's coming from, but on the other hand, we've just come off of 8 years where most of out values were trashed. If it was an uncommonly bad idea, B-pants would do it. The pResident seemed to take on the mantle of Santa Claus to the squirrely right, and at least, I felt like an orphan- an orphan in Wonderland where every thing I believed about this country was turned up-side-down. I felt for the first time what it was to be held in contempt by country: how could it be the country I thought it was, if something like this could happen? So, yeah, I'm feeling sensitive, want to make something of it?

When Obama was elected, I didn't expect to suddenly wake up in a righted world, but I didn't expect contempt, and this Rick Warren thing feels like that. I mean, what it * had picked The Right Reverend William Sloan Coffin? Can you see that? Why couldn't Obama have just picked some obscure Episcopalian priest and let it go at that.

On the other hand, it's simple enough to see that if we get into a position of having presidents become the republic Santa, and the Dem Santa, that kind of thing could spiral out of control rather quickly. So, once again Dems have to suck it up, be the grownups, and right things again. That doesn't mean I can't, or shouldn't be pissed off about it at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
59. That describes it for me n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
60. Me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
61. That's me;
Hey, he said on election night we wouldn't agree with everything he'd do. And he was right about that.

But this is at best a misstep - Warren is a fraud, which Obama should have known from the "McCain is in a cone of silence" nonsense. I hope it proves to be rare. And people who aren't happy about it should let him know, to make it less likely it happens again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
62. I will wait till I hear what Both Obama and Warren and others at the inauguration
have to say.

This move by OBama is obviously part of his plan to unite all Americans,
and after 18 months of hearing Obama state that we rise or fall as one,
I have enough patience, after waiting for 8 years, to wait few more days.

I am a liberal after all, and have an open mind and an open heart.

I will judge by the sum of the parts, and not by each move.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
66. This whole Warren thing has been a macrocosm of election night for me.
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 01:09 PM by Kitsune
First, utter elation that Obama won (even if it was kind of a foregone conclusion going in). Then, the punch in the gut that was Prop 8. I stayed awake until about 4:30 AM, watching the numbers on the California Secretary of State's website inch one way or the other, until I finally lost hope and crashed.

I've been excited about the inauguration (was never going to go, crowds freak me out), mildly annoyed at some of the crappy cabinet picks Obama's made, but I still thought he'd at least be vaguely on our side. Then he had to go and make the biggest cockup possible. Seriously, the only way he could have made a worse choice would be to have an all-Westboro-Baptist chorus line as the opening act.

I'm just utterly gobsmacked, because it means Obama is completely fucking tone-deaf on GLBT issues or he just doesn't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
69. I'm disappointed
I wish he had picked someone who didn't have all the negative baggage. There must have been someone out there who could lead the invocation who didn'r have this outspoken divisive point of view.

The Inauguration should be about bring the country together, and having someone who has such reactionary views kickoff the festivities is counter productive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elkston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
70. I am a strong Obama supporter. The Warren pick is puzzling.
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 02:40 PM by elkston
It seems like a gesture that is absolutely unnecessary. If he wants to reach out more to Warren, then he can go speak at his Church again after he is in office.

But, I figure there is a method to his madness. So I'm behind my main man. Obama has to screw up a TON of stuff for me to move away from him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
72. It does more harm than good overall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
74. I don't like it, but
I still think that we are infinitely better off with Obama than we would be with McCain as the next president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
76. Present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
77. Big Obama supporter. Don't like the Warren choice, but not freaked about it.
It's a 3 minute invocation, followed by a bendiction by very pro-gray Rev. Lowry. I'm not gay but I fully support gay rights -- I just can't get that worked up over a 3 minute prayer. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
78. I agree with what you say, 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC